Source | Persagen.com |
URL | Sources.html |
Author | |
Date | 2020-07-03 |
Modified | |
Summary | Notes on informational sources (notably, exclusions). |
While
[CBC.ca, 2021-08-19] Canadian Nobel scientist's deletion from
[EcoWatch.com, 2021-12-24] Volunteers Work to Keep Climate Deniers off of Wikipedia.
Accordingly, material sourced from
Comments are added (where particularly needed), e.g. to clarify content (e.g.,
Regarding omissions in Wikipedia content:
Replicated text is often gently edited, for example by adding links to referenced entities and material, and to facilitate the addition of
While minor edits to scraped Wikipedia content may not be indicated, substantial edits are clearly indicated as as comments appended to the original (source) Wikipedia article , at or near the edit site. E.g.:
Petroni F. et al. (2022-07-08) "Improving Wikipedia Verifiability with AI." arXiv:2207.06220 | GitHub | demo
... or,
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. [Source: Example.com, 2022-01-18.]
Infrequently, blocks of sourced content may reorganized for improved continuity and readability. Likewise (very rarely) sourced sentences may be simplified (e.g. split into two sentences), to improve grammar and understanding.
References to named entities in Wikipedia and other articles may be edited to resolve coreferences and to clarify semantic content. Sentence structure may at times also be slightly edited, for better readability.
While the liberal replacement of pronouns with their referent forms (e.g. personal names) needlessly increases repetition for the Reader, those substitutions greatly disambiguate the text providing greater clarity for the Reader as well as facilitating more robust and accurate machine-based natural natural language processing (named entity recognition; coreference resolution; machine reading and comprehension; ...).
Unlike other sourced material on Persagen.com, Wikipedia references - which are crowdsourced and may be very numerous - are not vetted. This file ("Persagen: Sources") contains notes on various news sources - many of which are otherwise excluded on Persagen.com, but are nevertheless used by the internet community when authoring Wikipedia articles. Because of this - and more practically, to improve readability to humans and machines - Wikipedia references are omitted on Wikipedia content replicated on Persagen.
Rationale: Wikipedia articles are used:
to provide general background information and knowledge;
to identify and connect broad areas of knowledge (entities and concepts); and,
to provide a structural framework for addition of vetted, non-Wikipedia sourced material.
In all cases, Readers should refer to the main Wikipedia article for those references and draw their own conclusions regarding the accuracy and reliability of that content.
Key named entities in the article are identified and linked to other relevant content, textually / ontologically / graphically (graphical model: semantic property graph; ...).
"Additional reading" (news articles, ...) subsections containing content relevant to the article are appended at the bottoms of those articles. Those additions contain well-sourced material that is generally more recent that the content appearing above it on those pages - free of the adversarial editing practices that occur on Wikipedia.
While the editorial decisions above improve the informational content of Wikipedia articles, the Reader should note the dates of additions of Wikipedia content, additionally referring to the main Wikipedia page for the most recent ("raw") content.
Ostensively defended as protecting the unborn fetus, United States anti-abortion / pro-life movements opportunistically conflate that issue with other issues aligned with Christian Right and socially conservative movements. These include the following, generally meticulously planned and well-coordinated strategies.
Erosion of women's rights and attacks on feminist movements (rights to self-determination).
Erosion of the separation of church and state (e.g. introducing religious doctrine in schools).
Anti-LGBT agendae (homophobia; transphobia; same-sex marriage; rights to self-determination).
Attacks on the transgender community, largely based on pseudoscience, stereotypes, ignorance, prejudice, and disinformation.
A broadly deployed strategy is the use of anti-transgender wedge issues / wedge attacks - refined by attacks the partition and separate the "T" from the "LGB" - but also broadly amenable to partitioning and attacking the LGBT community as a whole.
Examples of wedge tactics include attacking the participation of trans women in sports, and the fear-mongering "bathroom predator" myth (meme).
Conscientious objections or moral objections to providing services (healthcare, etc.) based on religious convictions.
Whenever and wherever anti-abortion activity take hold, erosions of women's rights and anti-LGBT attacks (particularly on the relatively smaller, more stigmatized and vulnerable transgender community) invariably follow.
In that regard, this 2021-11-04
"... It's not just suppression of LGBT+ activists that is troubling. So-called 'family charters' ['Marriage is a natural institution to which the mission of reproduction is entrusted.' - i.e., heterosexual unions] adopted by municipalities seeking to limit marriage to heterosexual couples, the establishment of 'LGBT-free zones' by these same municipalities, attempts to block sex education classes and government moves to limit the sale of contraception, are all characteristics of the current government. ..."
As of 2021-11-04 - despite international condemnation [local copy] of the nearly absolute abolition of abortion and LGBT rights in Poland - the lengthy Wikipedia entry for Poland does not mention any of the following terms.
"gay";
"gender" (hence, no mention of "gender identity");
"LBGT";
"LGBT"; or,
"trans" (hence, no mention of "transgender", etc.)".
The sole mentions of "abortion" or "sexuality" in Wikipedia's article on Poland are in the following paragraph (at the end of the Law subsection).
"Abortion is permitted only in cases of rape, incest or when the woman's life is in danger. Congenital disorder and stillbirth are not covered by the law, forcing some women to seek abortion abroad, and others to seek the assistance of psychiatrists willing to testify on the negative psychological impact of stillbirth. Poland does not criminalize homosexuality, and its legality was confirmed in 1932. The Polish Constitution defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman."
Absence of discussion of anti-abortion and anti-LGBT issues (affecting millions of people directly and indirectly) in Wikipedia's Poland article reflect censorship by omission. Accordingly, while Wikipedia is an important source of information, per Editorial Practices at Persagen, content sourced from Wikipedia is:
scrutinized for content, errors, and omissions; and,
supplemented with additional content relevant to that content.
As a further example, as of 2021-11-04 neither of the Wikipedia articles
To aid the reader in discerning adjacent yet distinct internet links, compounded URLs are separated by double spaces; e.g.:
[π pinned article] Comment (Persagen.com).
Regarding sources of information for Persagen.com, this file annotates web sites that are regularly encountered by Persagen or other users. All sources need to be carefully and continually scrutinized for accuracy and bias. Informational sources requiring additional inspection are flagged as follows.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to ownership by ...
Suggestions for assessing β οΈ yellow-flagged sites include examining the author(s), author affiliations, explicit and implicit biases, etc.
Note: due to it's breadth of coverage, depth of analyses, and categorization of bias and ranking of credibility I rely extensively on Media Bias/Fact Check as a first line of analysis regarding suitability of informational sources for inclusion on Persagen.com. HOWEVER, even Media Bias/Fact Check is biased; accordingly, their reviews and conclusions must be studied, analytically. As an example, as of 2021-10-30 Media Bias/Fact Check assigned a "HIGH CREDIBILITY' rating to National Review, despite stated failed fact checks and sourcing of information from known disinformation sources. Hence, I β οΈ -flag Media Bias/Fact Check, for increased scrutiny of it's content, analyses, and ratings.
Challenges to sourcing and distributing newsworthy information include attacks on journalists / journalism, the decline of local journalism, monopolization of news domains, misinformation and disinformation, and disproportionate influence of extreme wealth.
Regarding the influence of wealth, wealthy corporations and billionaires - in addition to owing major news sources such as
In the worst cases, Machiavellian billionaires such as
As a further example, the fact-checking The Trust Project from highly influential and questionable entities
We now live in a post-truth society - fueled by misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theories propagated on mass media sites such as Fox News and social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. With recent advances in artificial intelligence including machine learning and natural language processing, hyper-realistic fake content is easily and abundantly generated by specialists and novices alike. Neural networks can effortlessly generate deepfake videos, while deep contextualized language models such as BERT, GPT-3, and other natural language processing language models. Furthermore, even well-engineered neural networks are prone to algorithmic bias. Recognizing, appreciating and understanding those phenomena requires expert knowledge of the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence and mass media domains.
Ultimately - even given fact-checking services (such as IFCN and curated informational sources such as Persagen.com - you must ultimately use your experience and common sense to partition fact from fiction, and truth from non-truth. While there is no perfect solution, recommendations [local copy, 2021-10-21] from the Library at the University of California - Merced) provide a reasonable approach.
[π pinned article] Ultimately, selection and fact-checking of sources and information is an individual responsibility. These recommendations [local copy, 2021-10-21] from the Library at the University of California - Merced) provide a reasonable approach.
Ballotpedia, an online encyclopedia about U.S. political and judicial systems, published by the Lucy Burns Institute.
FactCheck.org (Wikipedia).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, Factcheck.org is a least biased credible fact-checker that is Very High for factual reporting due to impeccable sourcing of information.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: VERY-HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Factcheck.org is a nonprofit website that describes itself as a non-partisan "consumer advocate for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics." It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. Factcheck.org has won four Webby Awards in the Politics category in 2008, 2010, 2011, and 2012.
The Annenberg Foundation owns and funds Factcheck.org. The Annenberg Foundation receives grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Factcheck.org provides well-sourced unbiased fact-checking. Quite simply, Factcheck.org can be trusted to provide accurate fact checks with minimal bias. Factcheck.org is used by Media Bias Fact Check as a resource to check claims when reviewing sources. They are on our Top 10 Fact Checker list.
None. They are an IFCN Fact Checker.
ICANN (domain name registry; check, verify domain ownership, ...)
The
Wikipedia: List of fact-checking websites (bookmarked at "North America" subsection).
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
Media Bias/Fact Check (stylized Media Bias/Fact Check) | MBFC | MediaBiasFactCheck.com
Comment. Due to it's breadth of coverage, depth of analyses, and categorization of bias and ranking of credibility I rely extensively on Media Bias/Fact Check as a first line of analysis regarding suitability of informational sources for inclusion on Persagen.com. HOWEVER, even Media Bias/Fact Check is biased; accordingly, their reviews and conclusions must be studied, analytically. As an example, as of 2021-10-30 Media Bias/Fact Check assigned a "HIGH CREDIBILITY' rating to National Review, despite stated failed fact checks and sourcing of information from known disinformation sources. Hence, I β οΈ -flag Media Bias/Fact Check, for increased scrutiny of it's content, analyses, and ratings.
Wikipedia: Media Bias/Fact Check, 2021-10-21
Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by editor
Autobiography: MediaBiasFactCheck.com/about/
"
"The combination of being fascinated by politics, a keen eye to spot bias before he even knew what it was called, and an education/career in science gave Dave the tools required for understanding Media Bias and its implications. This led to a 20-year journey where Dave would read anything and everything he could find on media bias and linguistics. He also employed the scientific method in the development of a methodology to support his assessments.
"After years of people telling him to launch a website, in late 2015, Mediabiasfactcheck.com was born from a combination of many different experiences and exhaustive research. For the last 5+ years, Dave and his team have refined their methods and improved their reviews to the point where the website receives consistent high traffic levels and is considered a top authority in rating media bias and credibility."
Frequently Asked Questions: Who in the heck is
"
As a critical (hence judgemental) fact-checking website, Media Bias/Fact Check has attackers that unfairly try to discredit Media Bias/Fact Check. For example, the opaque Hucksters.net website - flying the banner "Exposing fraud, corruption, and censorship" - nonetheless claims that Media Bias/Fact Check's
π STOP! Excluded from sources over concerns of funding from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation (which holds disproportionate wealth and influence), associations of co-founder Gordon Crovitz with
Type: browser extension; mobile application.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate NewsGuard Least Biased based on neutral wording and the use of a credible methodology. We also rate them High for factual reporting based on proper sourcing of all information.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 2018, NewsGuard is a browser extension that displays the credibility and transparency of media sources. Steven Brill and Louis "L." Gordon Crovitz are the Co-Founders. Brill founded The American Lawyer, Court TV, and the Yale Journalism Initiative. L. Gordon Crovitz was the publisher and columnist of The Wall Street Journal.
NewsGuard is a for-profit company that began with $6 million dollars of seed funding. Investors include the two co-founders, as well as notable groups such as the Knight Foundation and Cox Investment Holdings. A full list of the seed donors can be found here. NewsGuard generates revenue through licensing of its ratings to advertisers, who use these ratings when determining what sites are safe to place their advertising. They have also formed a partnership with Microsoft Corporation by having their extension built into the Microsoft Edge. NewsGuard is currently seeking more partnerships and licensing agreements.
NewsGuard reviews and rates media and information sources using a 100 point scale. Each source is rated on 9 different criteria and with each criterion having a different weight that totals 100 for a perfect score. Any source that scores a 60 or above will be given a green shield and those below 60 will receive a red shield. NewsGuard also provides, what it calls a "Nutrition Label", to explain how they came to their conclusions. The nutrition label is well-sourced and provides examples to support their claims.
In review, NewsGuard reviews media websites and rates them according to the criteria listed above. The information provided on their nutrition labels is thorough and sourced properly. They also do not use loaded words and maintain a neutral tone in their reviews. We found that there are many sources given a green shield rating, that we rate Mixed for factual reporting. This simply indicates that they have a different standard in their ratings. Perhaps a yellow shield would be appropriate for sources that are transparent, but occasionally publish misleading information, or as we rate them "Factually Mixed." NewsGuard does not factor bias into their ratings, though they will mention it on their nutrition label. The primary focus of the ratings is on transparency and lack of deception, such as labeling advertising and separating opinion from news pieces.
NewsGuard has faced both criticism and praise. The number one criticism of NewsGuard, is that some sites that many perceive as being untrustworthy, were given a green shield and some sources that people find trustworthy were given a red shield (Al Jazeera). NewsGuard has been criticized by
In general, NewsGuard provides evidence-based information that is well-sourced and adheres to established criteria.
See main entry (below).
See main entry (below).
π STOP! Excluded from sources; RationalWiki is a combative (trolling) wiki-styled website presenting highly-biased points of view that - despite being ideologically opposed to conspiratorial / alternative medicine / fundamentalist Christian / ... content favored at self-described American conservative and fundamentalist ChristianConservapedia - diminishes readers' confidence in RationalWiki content. [Comment: As a general recommendation, it is probably best to avoid highly-biased, combative sources of information.]
RationalWiki main page:
Our purpose here at RationalWiki includes:
Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement;
Documenting the full range of crank ideas;
Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism;
Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.
RationalWiki is a wiki whose stated goals are to "analyze and refute pseudoscience and the anti-science movement, document "crank" ideas, explore conspiracy theories, authoritarianism, and fundamentalism, and analyze how these subjects are handled in the media." RationalWiki was created in 2007 as a counterpoint to Conservapedia after an incident in which contributors attempting to edit Conservapedia were banned.
In April 2007, Peter Lipson, a doctor of internal medicine, attempted to edit Conservapedia's article on breast cancer to include evidence against Conservapedia's claim that abortion was linked to the disease. Conservapedia is an encyclopedia established by Andy Schlafly [son of notorious conservative activist and lawyer Phyllis Stewart Schlafly] as an alternative to
Prior to 2010, RationalWiki's domains were registered to Trent Toulouse, and the wiki was hosted from a server located in his home. In 2010, Trent Toulouse incorporated a nonprofit organization, the RationalWiki Foundation Inc., to manage the affairs and pay the operational expenses of the website. In July 2013, the RationalWiki Foundation changed its name to the RationalMedia Foundation, stating that its aims extended beyond the RationalWiki site alone.
RationalWiki differs in several ways from the philosophy of Wikipedia and some other informational wikis. It is written from a self-described "snarky point of view" and "scientific point of view" rather than a "neutral point of view," and publishes opinion, speculation, and original research.] Many RationalWiki articles mockingly describe beliefs that RationalWiki opposes, especially when covering topics such as alternative medicine or fundamentalist Christians.
A significant fraction of activity on RationalWiki used to be critiquing and "monitoring Conservapedia". RationalWiki contributors, many of whom are former Conservapedia contributors, are often highly critical of Conservapedia, and according to an article published in the
Both Hao Yan et. al 2019 and Markus Knoche et al., two articles about classifying a writer's biases via text analysis, asserted that Conservapedia was "conservative" and RationalWiki was "liberal
.[ ... snip ... ]
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate RationalWiki Left-Center biased based on the use of loaded language against conservatives and High for factual reporting due to pro-science reporting coupled with proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in April 2007 by Peter Lipson, a doctor of internal medicine, RationalWiki analyzes and refutes pseudoscience and the anti-science movement, documenting the full range of crank ideas, explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism, analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.
From a historical perspective, RationalWiki was created as a response to Conservapedia, which is routinely critical of liberals and atheists. MBFC lists Conservapedia as a Questionable source based on the publication of right-wing Christian Propaganda, as well as false reports.
RationalWiki is owned by the RationalMedia Foundation and is funded through donations.
In review, RationalWiki is a wiki site that is open source and editable by anyone. RationalWiki is different from Wikipedia in that they openly use loaded language to describe conservatives and those who promote conspiracies and pseudoscience. In general, RationalWiki does not attempt to hide their bias as they routinely poke fun at conservatives. This has led to them being labeled leftists. Perhaps RationalWiki leans left, but in the end, they are a pro-Science source. In general, all information is sourced to credible sources of evidence, much like Wikipedia.
A factual search reveals RationalWiki has not failed a fact check.
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to past issues of plagiarism by Snopes owner David Mikkelson and other senior management issues, associations with Facebook, ...
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: we rate Snopes Left-Center biased based on news story selection that slightly favors a liberal perspective. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to an investigation that indicates a co-founding editor engaged in plagiarism. The plagiarism was not related to Fact-Checks and they remain credible for fact-checking.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1994 by Barbara Mikkelson and David Mikkelson, Snopes.com, also known as the Urban Legends Reference Pages, was one of the first online fact-checking websites. It is a resource for validating and debunking such stories in American popular culture. Snopes ownership has said that the site receives more complaints of liberal bias than conservative bias but insists that the same debunking standards are applied to all political claims and urban legends.
On 8/13/2021, a BuzzFeed investigation revealed that co-founder David Mikkelson plagiarized over 50 news stories between 2015 and 2019.
On 2021-08-13, BuzzFeed News published an investigation by reporter Dean Sterling Jones that showed David Mikkelson had used plagiarized material from different news sources in 54 articles between 2015 and 2019 in an effort to increase website traffic. Mikkelson also published plagiarized material under a pseudonym, "Jeff Zarronandia". The BuzzFeed inquiry prompted Snopes to launch an internal review of Mikkelson's articles and retracted 60 of them the day the Buzzfeed story appeared. Mikkelson admitted to committing "multiple serious copyright violations" and apologized for "serious lapses in judgment." He was suspended from editorial duties during the investigation, but remains an officer and stakeholder in the company. [Source; Wikipedia:
According to their about page, Snopes.com is an independent publication owned by Snopes Media Group. They derive funding from online advertising as well as donations. They fully disclose funding and expenses, as well as listing any donation over $10,000. For example, they list that Facebook paid them $100,000, and the James Randi Educational Foundation awarded them $75,000 in the past. In 2020, they received a donation of $10,030 from Wei-Hwa Huang and Trisha Brooke Huang. Snopes offers full transparency with funding.
In 2012, FactCheck.org reviewed a sample of Snopes' responses to political rumors regarding George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, and Barack Obama and found them free from bias in all cases. Critics of the site have made the false claim [Comment: note:
Snopes was previously a signatory of the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) that the Poynter Institute runs. Snopes was independently verified by the IFCN, which lists its core principles as: "non-partisanship and fairness, transparency of sources, transparency of funding and organization, transparency of methodology, and open and honest corrections policy." They met these criteria, along with 80+ other fact-checkers worldwide. However, in 2019 they left the IFCN.
Further, Snopes always openly source their information and avoid emotional wording, though they occasionally publish news stories that offer some opinions. Snopes is frequently accused of liberal bias by some on the right. For example, the Daily Express of the U.K. [see Daily Mail entry] and the Daily Caller [Daily Caller] have criticized them for fact checks they felt were wrong or biased against the right.
According to research performed by Real Clear Politics in the article: "Snopes and Editorializing Fact Checks," they determined that out of the six fact-checkers working with Facebook, "that Snopes is the least likely to fact-check matters of opinion." This is important because opinion is something that cannot be fact-checked. The article went on to say, "We have found that since we started our project, Snopes has fact-checked opinions only 2 percent of the time. In other words, 98 percent of the time, it sticks to matters of verifiable fact. Such an achievement is even more remarkable given that during this period, they produced the second-most articles of the six fact-checking outfits."
In 2021, Snopes' fact-checks remain properly sourced and factual. We have also found a reasonable balance between fact checks on the right and left as a new Democratic administration makes statements subject to fact-checking.
Finally, the Snopes website also features news reports from other sources such as
Snopes.com is a Fact-Checker.
The Trust Project is a complex international consortium involving approximately 120 news organizations working towards greater transparency and accountability in the global news industry, including The Economist,
The Trust Project was started in 2014 by Sally Lehrman, a journalist and former director of Santa Clara University's journalism ethics program at the
Sally Lehrman [local copy, 2021-10-21], an award-winning journalist, founded and leads The Trust Project, an international collaboration that she began building in 2014 to strengthen public confidence in the news through accountability and transparency. The consortium, which involves about 100 news organizations, has created a set of digital standards called "Trust Indicators" that help the public and news distribution platforms easily identify reliable news sites. Lehrman provides vision and strategy, guiding the effort as it implements the news industry's first-ever transparency standards for users to see and machines to read, also overseeing collaborative implementation and scaling among newsrooms around the world. Sally Lehrman was named one of MediaShift's Top 20 Digital Innovators in 2018 for this work.
Major news distribution platforms including
Sally Lehrman is an award-winning reporter on medicine, biotechnology and science policy. Her honors include a Peabody Award, Peabody/Robert Wood Johnson Award for Excellence in Health and Medical Programming, and Columbia/Du Pont Silver Baton (The DNA Files); the SPJ Wells Key (the Society of Professional Journalists' highest honor); various other reporting and writing awards; and the John S. Knight Fellowship at Stanford University. Byline credits include Scientific American, Nature, Health,
[ ... snip ... ]
In computing, a news aggregator, also termed a feed aggregator, feed reader, news reader, RSS reader or simply an aggregator, is client software or a web application that aggregates syndicated web content such as online newspapers, blogs, podcasts, and video blogs (vlogs) in one location for easy viewing. The updates distributed may include journal tables of contents, podcasts, videos, and news items.
Benefits. Depending on how they are configured, news aggregators can scrape a large swaths of the internet for information, countering the filter bubble state of intellectual isolation.
Concerns. Depending on how they are configured, news aggregators generally provide unsupervised content, that must be carefully scrutinized for errors. omissions and facts.
RECOMMENDATION. The use of news aggregators is discouraged in favor of the pursuit of knowledge from a cross-section of reputable sources - ideally, primary sources.
News aggregation websites include: Facebook News,
Wikipedia entry
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2020 by
Both
In review,
Editorially,
None in the Last 5 years.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize due to ties to and funding from the French government.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate AFP Least Biased based on balanced story selection and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1835,
Two of his employees, Paul Julius Reuter and Bernard Wolff, later founded their own news agencies,
As of April 2018, The Chairman & Chief Executive Officer is Fabrice Fries.
In 1981, the New Internationalist published an article called "The Big Four" (referring to the 'big four' news agencies United Press International,
Currently,
In review,
According to a
Although we did not find substantial evidence of State bias in our review, it must be considered that 40% of their funding comes from the French government, which may influence reporting.
None to date. They are an IFCN fact-checker.
π STOP! Excluded from sources. AlterNet.org often lifts articles from Daily Kos and The New Civil Rights Movement - which due to questionable content is excluded from sources. Alternet also frequently lifts articles from Salon (and sometimes vice versa). While MediaBiasFactCheck.com rates Salon.com as "mostly factual," due to the overlap between content posted, shared, and reposted on DailyKos.com, AlterNet.org, The New Civil Rights Movement, Salon.com, ... I am excluding these three sources.
AlterNet.org landing page.
Wikipedia entry:
Alternet is a politically left-leaning website that was launched in 1998 by the non-profit now known as the Independent Media Institute. In 2018, the website was acquired by owners of The Raw Story. Some Alternet content is republished on Salon.
Clarification:
The Association of Alternative Newsweeklies [founded in 1987; now: Association of Alternative Newsmedia] founded the Institute for Alternative Journalism, which was incorporated in 1983-12.
The Institute for Alternative Journalism became the Independent Media Institute some time before December 1999.
AlterNet was founded in the fall of 1987 by the Institute for Alternative Journalism.
On 2018-04-09, it was announced that AlterNet was acquired by owners of The Raw Story, an online news organization, under the newly created company AlterNet Media. In an online statement, Raw Story founder John K. Byrne stated, "AlterNet will continue to carry content from the Independent Media Institute, its prior owner. Thus, much of the content you expect will remain the same. You will see articles by former AlterNet writers appearing with the Independent Media Institute byline." [Source: Wikipedia.]
See also:
Funded by / Ownership. Alternet is owned by the owners of The Raw Story under the name Alternet Media. The website is funded through online advertising.
Analysis / Bias.Overall, we rate Alternet far Left Biased based on story selection and wording that always favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a few failed fact checks as well as the promotion of pseudoscience.
In review, Alternet publishes news with a far left bias through story selection and the use of emotionally loaded words such as these: "Trump goes off in an all-caps New Year's Eve Twitter meltdown: 'MEXICO IS PAYING FOR THE WALL,' and "The F Word: The Craven Right Wing Is Now Smearing Teenage School Shooting Survivors." The website also features a separate news category that focuses on negative reports about Donald Trump. When it comes to sourcing, Alternet typically uses known mainstream sources such as the New York Daily News and
Alternet also frequently delves into pseudoscience with the promotion of anti-GMO propaganda, which is not consistent with the consensus of science. Alternet has consistently reported on the connection between cell phones and cancer, which is misleading as there is not a scientific consensus on whether radiation for cell phones causes cancer or not.
In general, Alternet consistently publishes pro-Left news stories and those that denigrate the right.
A factual search reveals that Alternet has a Mixed claim via Snopes and false claim from Check Your Fact.
Overall, we rate Alternet far Left Biased based on story selection and wording that always favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a few failed fact checks as well as the promotion of pseudoscience. (5/13/2016) Updated (
AlterNet has received $25,000 from the Bauman Foundation, which has donated millions of dollars to left-of-center causes over the past decade. The Bauman Family Foundation also has ties to the Democracy Alliance.
Bauman Foundation: Grants, by Fiscal Year (July 01 - June 30) | |||
Data captured 2020-09-11. | |||
Grantee | Fiscal Year | Amount | Cumulative Amount |
AlterNet | 2008-09 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
π STOP! Excluded from sources: donor / funding information not disclosed; concerns over conservatism bias; Advisory Board includes the reprehensible Tucker Carlson [FOX News shill, conspiracy theorist, disinformationist]; ...
The American Conservative is a magazine published by the
The American Conservative was founded by Pat Buchanan, Scott McConnell and Taki Theodoracopulos in 2002 in opposition to the Iraq War. Daniel Strauss wrote:
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The American Conservative Right-Center Biased based on story selection that moderately favors the Right and does not hesitate to criticize Republicans (Trump) when not adhering to conservative policy. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2002 and published by the American Ideas Institute, The American Conservative is a bi-monthly journal of
The American Conservative was founded by Pat Buchanan, Scott McConnell and Taki Theodoracopulos in 2002 in opposition to the Iraq War. The current editor is W. James Antle III.
The American Conservative is owned by the
In review, The American Conservative has argued against American interventionism, against a debt-based fiscal policy, and against the intrusions on Americans' private lives by the institutions and mores that exist and the wisdom that underlies them. The American Conservative is a very well-written source with a libertarian perspective.
The American Conservative presents news and opinions with moderately loaded language: "What Happens When Kim Stands Trump Up at the Altar?" This story is very well sourced to
While they do not support the progressive agenda of a New Green Deal, they do acknowledge that action must be taken, albeit with a more free-market approach. Regardless of solutions, The American Conservative supports the consensus of science. However, during the 2020 United States presidential election, they have promoted election fraud information contrary to the findings of election experts. The article "Memorandum: How The 2020 Election Could Have Been Stolen" does not produce a single link to outside sources to verify the author's opinions.
Editorially, they support limited government, limited military presence in other countries, and general nationalism. In other words, this is a libertarian / paleoconservative organization. In general, they publish mostly opinion-based content that is mostly factual but sometimes uses poor sourcing techniques.
None in the Last 5 years.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1990,
The nonprofit
In review,
Editorially,
None to date.
Homepage:
Wikipedia (2022-01-20):
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2004,
In review, like
None in the Last 5 years.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
When it comes to reporting on the Trump administration,
They are a certified IFCN fact-checker.
Association of Alternative Newsmedia | |
Sources (Wikipedia): | |
Name | Association of Alternative Newsmedia |
Former name | Association of Alternative Newsweeklies |
Abbreviation | ANN |
Founded | 1978 |
Type | 501(c)(6) nonprofit organization |
Mission | Clearinghouse for stories generated by Association of Alternative Newsweeklies members |
Headquarters | Washington, D.C., U.S.A. |
Region served | Metropolitan areas in 42 states | Washington D.C. | 4 Canadian Provinces |
President | Graham Jarrett (Orlando Weekly) |
Former President | Molly Willmott (current Association Manager) |
Executive Director | Jason Zaragoza |
Membership | Alternative weekly newspapers |
Affiliations | Alternative Newsweekly Foundation |
Derivatives: |
|
Revenue | 2014: $556,323 |
Expenses | 2014: $796,491 |
Website | AAN.org |
The Association of Alternative Newsmedia (ANN), formerly known as the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies, is a trade association of alternative weekly newspapers in North America. It was founded in 1978 in Seattle, Washington, with 30 newspapers from America's largest cities. Today, it provides services to many generally liberal or progressive weekly newspapers across the United States and in Canada. The association is made up of 131 newspapers which are published in 42 states, Washington D.C., and four Canadian provinces. States not represented are Alaska, Delaware, Kansas, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Dakota, and West Virginia.
In July 2011, the organization's name was changed from the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies to the Association of Alternative Newsmedia, by a vote of members attending the group's annual meeting.
The Association of Alternative Newsmedia also operates AltWeeklies.com [2021: now redirects to main landing page AAN.org] - a Web portal that highlights the best news stories, features, arts criticism and political commentary from its member newspapers.
See Wikipedia entry. 2021-10-15: AlterNet is not listed; The Raw Story is listed.
Landing page | Mission ("About")
Clarification:
The Association of Alternative Newsweeklies [founded in 1987; now: Association of Alternative Newsmedia] founded the Institute for Alternative Journalism, which was incorporated in 1983-12.
The Institute for Alternative Journalism became the Independent Media Institute some time before December 1999.
AlterNet was founded in the fall of 1987 by the Institute for Alternative Journalism.
2018-04-09, it was announced that AlterNet was acquired by owners of The Raw Story, an online news organization, under the newly created company AlterNet Media.
Source: Wikipedia, 2021-10-15.
AlterNet was founded in the fall of 1987 by the Institute for Alternative Journalism, which was incorporated in December 1983 with a mission to serve as a clearinghouse for important local stories generated by the members of the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies [now: Association of Alternative Newsmedia]. The founding editor of AlterNet was Alan Green, who with his deputy, Margaret Engle, created print and electronic mechanisms to syndicate both the works of Association of Alternative Newsweeklies papers and freelance contributors, among them Michael Moore and Abbie Hoffman. Margaret Engle took over for Alan Green in 1989 and ran the news service until 1993, in that time dramatically expanding AlterNet's base of contributors and client newspapers. Upon her resignation, Engle was succeeded by Don Hazen, who had been hired by the Institute for Alternative Journalism in 1991 to be its first executive director. AlterNet publishes a combination of policy critiques, investigative reports and analysis, grassroots success stories, and personal narratives.
Christine Triano was Associate Director of the Institute for Alternative Journalism, in 1996.
Media Heroes are annual awards by the Institute for Alternative Journalism. Frederick Clarkson was named among the "Media Heroes of 1992" James Danky was named a Media Hero in 1993.
In 1995, Media Heroes awards went to Public Media Center, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, Institute for Global Communications, Janine Jackson, Laura Flanders, CounterSpin, Gary Delgado, David Barsamian, Alternative Radio, Haiti Truth Team, Salim Muwakkil,
In 1996, Leslie Savan was named one of "The Top Ten Media Heroes". Patricia Scott, and Julie Drizin were named to the "Top Ten Media Heroes of 1996" Paul Klite, Executive Director of Rocky Mountain Media Watch, received a Media Hero Award from the Institute for Alternative Journalism in 1996. Amy Goodman, Bob Herbert, Detroit Sunday Journal, Gary Webb, Herbert Schiller, James Ridgeway, Karl Grossman, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Norman Solomon, and Urvashi Vaid received the 1997 Media Hero Award.
In 1997, Media Heroes awards were presented at the second Media & Democracy Congress. The Institute for Alternative Journalism named David Barsamian one of its Top Ten Media Heroes.
The Institute for Alternative Journalism became the Independent Media Institute some time before December 1999. After the sale of AlterNet to the new company - AlterNet Media in April 2018 - the Independent Media Institute launched a series of new programs including the Make It Right Project.
Wikipedia, 2021-09-27:
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
LEFT-CENTER BIAS: these media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources. Overall, we rate
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to tampering of associated Wikipedia entry, founders' associations with { BuzzFeed |
See also:
Wikipedia, 2021-12-16:
In the summer of 2016,
In 2017-01
In 2019-03 and 2019-04,
In July 2020,
In 2021-05
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
In the summer of 2016,
In review,
None in the Last 5 years.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The
In review, both sides of the political spectrum have accused the
The
According to the New Statesman's research, examining the impartiality of the
A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 60% of
When reporting general news, the
A group of puppies transported more than 100 miles died with COVID-19. - False (Corrected).
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize. The main concern - like
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
On November 24, 2019, majority owner
Michael R. Bloomberg is the founder and majority owner of
In review,
None to date.
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Boston Globe Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a reasonable fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH. | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1872, The Boston Globe is an American daily broadsheet newspaper based in Boston, Massachusetts. The Boston Globe has been awarded 23 Pulitzer Prizes since 1966. The current editor is Brain McGrory. The Boston Globe is one of the largest newspapers in the USA.
In review, The Boston Globe covers local news via journalists in the greater Boston area. The national news is also derived from journalists and republished from other sources such as the
Climate projections using models based on it [the water vapor feedback] have consistently failed - UNSUPPORTED
π STOP! Excluded from sources: founded by
See also:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE. A
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Failed Fact Checks | Bias Rating: RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY.
After
In 2018-10,
On 2020-07-27,
After the death of
A 2014
In general, most published stories favor the right and are
See also: HuffPost (formerly; The Huffington Post), currently owned by Verizon Media [2017+: Yahoo].
π STOP! Excluded from sources. Concerns include the following items (chiefly: news aggregation rather than investigative journalism; preoccupation with wealth, growth and acquisition; focus on digital arts and trending / viral content; questionable business practices (staff terminations; anti-union stance; native advertising; ...); associations with known disinformationists; self-promotion; promotion of consumerism; ...
Founders Jonah H. Peretti and John Seward Johnson III are entrepreneurs involved in creating and promoting digital arts projects.
For example, Eyebeam is a not-for-profit art and technology center in New York City, founded in 1998 by filmmaker / philanthropist John Seward Johnson III, with co-founders David S. Johnson and Roderic R. Richardson. Originally conceived as a digital effects and coding atelier and center for youth education, Eyebeam has become a center for the research, development, and curation of new media works of art and open source technology.
In 2003, John Seward Johnson III hired Jonah H. Peretti as Director of Research and Development at Eyebeam, with the purpose of establishing the web as a place for art experiments.
Circa 2004 Fundrace.org (a site which allows visitors to track campaign contributions through geocoding) was developed by Jonah Peretti, then-director of Research and Development at Eyebeam - later adapted into a permanent feature on The Huffington Post.
Jonah H. Peretti is an internet entrepreneur, a co-founder and the CEO of BuzzFeed, co-founder of The Huffington Post, and developer of reblogging under the project "Reblog."
In 2005 Jonah Peretti co-founded The Huffington Post - a news aggregator and blog - along with Kenneth Lerer,
The Huffington Post cofounder
Commenters such as Nick Gillespie and Conor Friedersdorf have credited
The conservative National Review said in 2020 that "Claremont stands out for beclowning itself with this embrace of the smarmy underside of American politics," although it noted that "many conservative institutions and individuals have adjusted their standards and long-proclaimed principles to accommodate Trump and Trumpism."
The Claremont Institute was an early defender of then-candidate Donald Trump;
In 2006, John Seward Johnson III co-founded the website BuzzFeed with entrepreneur Jonah H. Peretti. BuzzFeed is an online media company that detects and accelerates traction of trending news and entertainment. It was initially conceived of as a media analytics company to track viral content. BuzzFeed has grown into a global media and technology company, providing coverage on a variety of topics including politics, do-it-yourself, animals, and business.
BuzzFeed's business model relies primarily on native advertising in the form of quizzes and videos sponsored by companies, which also goes by the name sponsored content or advertorial - which is advertising content that looks like an editorial. Native advertising is a strategy that helps with increasing the likelihood of viewers read through the content of advertisements. BuzzFeed News also solicits membership fees.
The statement "BuzzFeed News is completely different from their parent site [BuzzFeed], which generally produces clickbait-type stores shared on Social Media." raises concern over the independence of the two entities (BuzzFeed: social media; BuzzFeed News: original investigative reporting. [In 2016, BuzzFeed split the news operation off from the BuzzFeed Entertainment Group.]
Despite BuzzFeed's entrance into serious journalism, a 2014 Pew Research Center survey found that in the United States, BuzzFeed was viewed as an unreliable source by the majority of respondents, regardless of age or political affiliation.
On 2019-01-23, BuzzFeed notified all employees via memo that there would be an upcoming 15% reduction in workforce affecting the international, web content, and news divisions of the company. The layoffs would affect approximately 200 employees. In 2020 BuzzFeed signed a deal with Universal Television to produce content based on its stories.
On 2020-11-19 BuzzFeed Inc. acquired the The Huffington Post from Verizon Media [2017+: Yahoo], making Verizon Media / Yahoo a minority stakeholder in BuzzFeed.
On 2021-03-09 the CEO of BuzzFeed, Jonah Peretti, said that the company had lost "around $20 million" during the previous year [2020]. The same day, it was announced that HuffPost Canada would be shut down, and immediately ceased publishing. BuzzFeed laid off 47 HuffPost staff in the U.S. (mostly journalists) and closed down HuffPost Canada, laying off 23 staff working for the Canadian and Quebec divisions of the company.
In 2021 at a virtual company meeting, Jonah Peretti - as BuzzFeed's chief executive officer - fired 47 employees at The Huffington Post in a controversial manner, sending a virtual meeting password "spr!ngisH3r3" to laid-off employees.
HuffPost has been criticized for providing a platform for alternative medicine and supporters of vaccine hesitancy.
In June 2021, BuzzFeed announced its plans to go public via a special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) and planned to acquire Complex Networks.
[LATimes.com, 2021-12-02] As BuzzFeed nears SPAC deal, news employees stage walkout.
BuzzFeed News employees on Thursday [2021-12-02] walked off the job as the company plans to trade on the stock market. The union said 61 employees participated in the 24-hour walkout to push for better wages and working conditions at the digital media company. Several are based in Los Angeles. The union said its employer is offering only a 1% annual guaranteed raise and a minimum salary floor of $50,000, which the guild believes is too low for people living in such cities as San Francisco, Los Angeles, and New York. The walkout is intended to "send a reminder that there's no BuzzFeed News without us as we fight for our first collective bargaining agreement," the union said on Twitter. The group, which is part of the News Guild of New York, said it has been bargaining for a contract for nearly two years. BuzzFeed News workers who participated in the walkout represent about 6% of the company's total employees.
The protest came on the same day [2021-12-02] as a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), 890 Fifth Avenue Partners Inc., is set to vote on a merger with BuzzFeed. The deal announced earlier this year is expected to close in the fourth quarter, giving BuzzFeed a valuation of $1.5 billion. Some investors are pulling out their money in the SPAC, reducing BuzzFeed's cash proceeds, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday [2021-12-02].
BuzzFeed, a New York-based news and entertainment media company, said it employs 1,100 workers and will grow to 1,400 employees next week after it acquires Complex Networks [Complex Networks], a youth network that features fashion, food, music and sports content, in a $300-million deal.
[ ... snip ... ]
Sources (all via Wikipedia) for the statements above:
[Vox.com, 2021-12-06] BuzzFeed's a public company. Now what? The fate of BuzzFeed is going to determine the fortunes of a lot of other companies.
The transformation from startup to
We can also acknowledge that BuzzFeed's transformation has been much rockier than it would have liked. Last week, when it formally morphed from a private company into a public one (using a "
But step back a bit further. The fact that BuzzFeed is around at all - let alone publicly traded, with all of the financial transparency and investor expectations that come with that - is worth noting.
BuzzFeed is perhaps the best-known member of a cohort of
Then their main strategy - latch on to Facebook, and profit when the
So the fact that BuzzFeed is still around, and big enough to plausibly exist as a
It's not nearly as sexy a story as it was six or seven years ago, when BuzzFeed's existence - along with other publishers like The Huffington Post and my employer,
Flash-forward to now, and BuzzFeed's ambitions are considerably scaled back: Like everyone else in media, it is trying to sell projects to studios and streamers that need content. But the idea of a BuzzFeed Motion Pictures unit seems like a stretch, which seems to be why the company no longer has a unit called that anymore.
A more concrete way of putting it: As of last week, BuzzFeed was valued at $1.5 billion - less than the $1.7 billion investors thought it was worth back in 2016, even though it has since acquired both HuffPost and Complex Networks, both big publishers in their own right.
Or, another, more practical way of underlining BuzzFeed's reined-in expectations: For years, BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti said he was fine with the fact that his BuzzFeed News unit was a money-loser because it did important work that he was happy to subsidize. But that has changed in recent years. In 2019, BuzzFeed had major layoffs in that group for the first time, and now
[ ... snip ... ]
Group Nine Media, Inc. was founded 2016-10 by Ben Lerer [cited / main article], the son of Kenneth "Ken" Lerer. Group Nine Media is an American digital media holding company based in New York City. In 2020-12, Group Nine formed its own corporate special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) to use the public funding for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination.
At the beginning of 2021, Group Nine created a blank-check SPAC company - the same mechanism BuzzFeed used to go public and buy Complex Networks. Monday [2021-12-13]'s news seems to be an admission that Group Nine couldn't find a company it wanted to buy, or that wanted to be acquired. (Group Nine's ownership stake in that SPAC will transfer over to
As mentioned above, in 2005 Jonah Peretti and Ken Lerer co-founded The Huffington Post.
At the time of the 2016 merger of Group Nine holdings, Discovery Communications [Discovery Channel, etc.] announced a $100 million minority investment in the collective organization, becoming the biggest shareholder before Axel Springer.
Relevant to this file (Persagen.com sources), Axel Springer acquired Business Insider in 2015, and
According to the Wall Street Journal, the combined company [
Kenneth Lerer is a Managing Partner at Lerer Hippeau. Kenneth Lerer cofounded The Huffington Post and was the longtime Chairman of BuzzFeed.
Ben Lerer is a Managing Partner at Lerer Hippeau and the CEO of Group Nine Media, Inc., a digital media holding company consisting of Thrillist, NowThis News, The Dodo, Seeker, and PopSugar Inc..
Eric Hippeau is a Managing Partner at Lerer Hippeau. Previously,
[ ... snip ... ]
[Vox.com, 2021-12-13] Why is Vox Media buying Group Nine? The Vox Media-Group Nine deal - and all the other digital media deals - explained.
Two weeks, two deals. And now four digital media companies are turning into two. Get ready for more of that. That's the takeaway from Monday [2021-12-13]'s news that
The BuzzFeed - Complex Group deal came as BuzzFeed went public, a move its CEO Jonah Peretti said he wanted to make because it would help him acquire more media companies. The new deal shows that you don't have to be public to buy a media company:
[ ... snip ... ]
And now the mashups are happening, one way or another. BuzzFeed, for instance, had already acquired HuffPost, the digital publisher Jonah Peretti had co-founded before launching his own company; he and Group Nine CEO Ben Lerer had previously talked about combining their two companies. Two years ago,
[ ... snip ... ]
Beyond sheer bulk, the eventual pitch to investors would be the one the company [Vox Media] wants to start making to advertisers as soon as possible: We've got stuff for everybody. I surveyed some of
Comment:: the following MediaBiasFactCheck.com is superseded by the comments, above.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate BuzzFeed News Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual rather than High due to past stories that either were not verified or ultimately were retracted.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2006 and headquartered in New York, BuzzFeed is a media news company delivering social news and entertainment. They provide a mix of breaking news, entertainment, and shareable content. Jonah Peretti and John Johnson are the founders of BuzzFeed, and the editor-in-chief was Ben Smith. In 2016, BuzzFeed split the news operation off from the BuzzFeed Entertainment Group, focusing more on BuzzFeed's video unit.
In 2018, BuzzFeed.com became a separate website, with Mark Schoofs serving as editor-in-chief. BuzzFeed News has been nominated for several Pulitzer Prizes and Webby Awards.
[Comment: Mark Schoofs' entry on Wikipedia indicates a thorough, Pulitzer Prize-winning accomplishment.]
Numerous investors funded BuzzFeed. New Enterprise Associates, New York-based venture capital firm RRE Ventures and Hearst Ventures were the early investors of BuzzFeed. In 2015, NBC (owned by Comcast Corporation; see also
BuzzFeed's business model relies primarily on native advertising in the form of quizzes and videos sponsored by companies, which also goes by the name sponsored content or advertorial - which is advertising content that looks like an editorial. BuzzFeed News also solicits membership fees.
BuzzFeed News is currently owned by Verizon Media [now Yahoo], who recently acquired HuffPost.
Yahoo is an American multinational technology company that focuses on media and online business. Verizon Communications acquired AOL in 2015. When Verizon Communications purchased Yahoo! in 2017, it merged AOL and Yahoo! into a subsidiary named Oath Inc.
In review, BuzzFeed News primarily publishes original reported news and investigations. News is broken down into sections such as Arts & Entertainment, Inequality, LGBTQ, Opinion, and Politics. BuzzFeed News is completely different from their parent site, which generally produces clickbait-type stores shared on Social Media. On the other hand, BuzzFeed News produces quality news reporting that is often investigative such as ...
None to date.
Wikipedia: the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, branded as
The
[2020-09-18] Editor's Blog: What trusted journalism looks like in the age of disinformation, polarization. A look at how
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1936 by an Act of Parliament, Canada's public broadcaster,
In 2009,
The
As a crown corporation, the
According to The Hill Times, a clause in Bill C-60 - an omnibus budget implementation bill introduced by the government of Stephen Joseph Harper in 2013 - "appears to contradict a longstanding arm's-length relationship between the independent
The
In review, when it comes to world news,
None to date.
Comment: Although I regard the
While the
On occasion, the
The
[CBC Media Centre] Rex Murphy → Appears on
[NationalPost.com, 2021-02-18] Rex Murphy: As Texas winter storm shows, hurling public money at renewable energy is pure folly
[NationalObserver.com, 2021-02-19] Really, Rex Murphy?
[Straight.com, 2022-01-03] Ex-CBC journalist Tara Henley declares on Substack that she quit her job due to the public broadcaster's shifting politics.
A
Tara Henley opened her piece on the Substack platform [Wikipedia: Substack, an American online platform that provides publishing, payment, analytics, and design infrastructure to support subscription newsletters] by revealing that she's been hearing complaints about the
The answer, according to Tara Henley, is that working at
Tara Henley suggested that the
Over the years, Tara Henley has contributed many articles to the Georgia Straight, some of which are available here. Tara Henley is one of many
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Canadian Dimension Left Biased based on pro-socialist, anti-capitalism advocacy. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to a lack of hyperlinked sourcing and publishing slightly misleading information regarding GMOs.
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL.
Founded in 1963, Canadian Dimension is described as a magazine "for people who want to change the world," Canadian Dimension is a forum for left-wing political thought that ranges from New Democratic Party-style social democracy to libertarian socialism. According to their about page "Canadian Dimension is the longest-standing voice of the left in Canada. For more than half a century, Canadian Dimension has provided a forum for lively and radical debate where red meets green, socialists take on social democrats, Indigenous voices are heard, activists report from every corner of the country, and the latest books and films are critically reviewed."
Canadian Dimension is owned by Dimension Publishing LLC. Revenue is generated through advertising, donations, and subscription fees.
In review, Canadian Dimension publishes news from an anti-capitalist, pro-socialist perspective such as this: "Red Flags: Reflections on racism and radicalism." A quote from the article reads "Capitalism lives and breathes racism. It can't survive without it. It picks it up, cultivates it, and injects it into everything." Canadian Dimension focuses on topics that are associated with the political left such as climate change, Feminism, Labour, and LGBTQ rights. However, many stories do not contain hyperlinked sourcing. When it comes to science, Canadian Dimension typically aligns with the consensus, though when it comes to GMOs they offer more negative reporting. Editorially, Canadian Dimension is far left in support of socialism as they often criticize liberal politicians such as Justin Trudeau for their pro-corporate policies.
None to date.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The
In review, The
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources. See also (this file):
While providing detailed reports with apparently factual financial data (spot fact-checked, e.g., against IRS Form 990 filings), content from Capital Research Center is strongly biased against left-wing ideology (politics and policies).
The Capital Research Center (CRC) was founded in 1984 by Willa Johnson, former senior vice president of The Heritage Foundation. Donors to the Capital Research Center have included foundations run by the
In 2017, the CRC launched the website "Influence Watch" [InfluenceWatch.org], which focuses on identifying funding sources of progressive organizations and initiatives. In Wikipedia, a search for "InfluenceWatch" redirects to the Capital Research Center.
Wikipedia:
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to biases and multiple failed fact checks.
... CNN is known for its dramatic live coverage of breaking news, some of which has drawn criticism as overly sensationalistic, and for its efforts to be nonpartisan, which have led to accusations of false balance. ...
... The presidency of Donald Trump has led to many prominent controversies involving CNN. The network was accused by critics of giving disproportionate amounts of coverage to Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. CNN president Jeff Zucker defended CNN against the criticism, commenting that out of the
MediaBiasFactCheck.com; overall, we rate CNN left biased based on editorial positions that consistently favor the left, while straight news reporting falls left-center through bias by omission. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks by TV hosts. However, news reporting on the website tends to be properly sourced with minimal failed fact checks.
CNN Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
The Cable News Network is owned by WarnerMedia, which is a multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate corporation owned by AT&T. CNN's television stations and website are funded through cable subscriptions and an advertising model.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize, particularly sources.
See also: SaltWire Network
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Chronicle Herald as Right-Center biased in reporting and Mixed factually due to publishing an unverified claim and poor sourcing.
Factual Reporting: MIXED.
Founded in 1874 as The Morning Herald, The Chronicle Herald is a newspaper published in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
The paper is owned by a Canadian newspaper publishing company, SaltWire Network, and is funded through subscriptions and advertising.
The Chronicle Herald delivers breaking news, opinion, sports, lifestyles, and more. In review, The Chronicle Herald has a right-center bias in reporting as many stories slightly favor the right. When reporting world news they typically use
Overall, we rate The Chronicle Herald as Right-Center biased in reporting and Mixed factually due to publishing an unverified claim and poor sourcing. (M. Huitsing 9/15/2017) Updated (9/14/2018)
The Conversation articles are written by academics, based on their area of research. The Conversation's editors commission and edit these articles, with stated aims of no jargon and accessibility to a wide audience. Topics include politics, culture, health, science, and the environment. All stories are published under a Creative Commons Attribution/No derivatives licence. The site operates as a not-for-profit, supported by collaborative frameworks for academic institutions.
In 2016, the FactCheck unit of The Conversation became the first fact-checking team in Australia and one of only two worldwide units accredited by the International Fact-Checking Network, which is an alliance of fact-checkers hosted at the Poynter Institute in the United States. The assessment criteria require non-partisanship, fairness, transparency of funding, sources, and methods, and a commitment to open and honest corrections.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Conversation Least Biased based on covering both the right-center and left-center politically, as well as covering evidence-based topics. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to excellent sourcing of information and a clean fact check record. In fact, The Conversation is an IFCN fact-checker.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Carbon Brief left-Center Biased and Pro-Science based on adherence to science consensus with climate change. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2010, Carbon Brief describes itself as a "U.K.-based website" that publishes articles on the latest developments about climate science and climate policy. According to their "About Page," Carbon Brief, specializes in "clear, data-driven articles and graphics to help improve the understanding of climate change, both in terms of the science and the policy response."
Carbon Brief's Editor and Director is journalist Leo Hickman. All staff can be found on their about page.
Carbon Brief states that European Climate Foundation provides their funding. They report on their about page funding totaled Β£597,888 for the financial year of 2019.
In review, Carbon Brief publishes articles related to climate change, including fact-checking articles in which headlines are generally low-biased "Factcheck: Did climate change contribute to India's catastrophic 'glacial flood'?" Information is usually properly sourced to credible media outlets such as the
Carbon Brief leans left politically in their concern for climate change, as evidenced by this article "U.S. election: Climate experts react to Joe Biden's victory." A quote from the article concerning the general reaction of scientists is positive as the former president had a climate skeptic view and acted accordingly, the quote reads "I find myself filled with relief and hope after what has been a nightmarish four years of the Trump administration reversing or halting numerous federal climate policies, sidelining and silencing scientists and trying to tamper with scientific reports." In general, they are pro-science in their publications and approach and hold a left-leaning political bias.
None to date. Carbon Brief is a resource for IFCN fact-checker Climate Feedback.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com; overall, we rate C-SPAN Least Biased and Very-High for factual reporting based on unfiltered coverage of congress.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Launched in 1979, C-SPAN offers live, unfiltered access to the congress and straightforward government news. C-SPAN also offers a morning call-in talk show called Washington Journal that discusses government and political issues. The C-SPAN network includes three television channels (C-SPAN, C-SPAN2, and C-SPAN3), one radio station (WCSP-FM), and a group of websites that provide streaming media and archives of C-SPAN programs.
According to the website, the mission is to "provide C-SPAN's audience access to the live gavel-to-gavel proceedings of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, and to other forums where public policy is discussed, debated and decided--all without editing, commentary or analysis and with a balanced presentation of points of view."
C-SPAN is a private, nonprofit organization owned by the
In review, C-SPAN programming is quite literally a camera pointed at congressional events. Headlines on the website using straightforward, non-biased language such as this: "Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Testifies on President's 2020 Budget Request." The website also provides video clips and transcripts from the morning call-in show, Washington Journal, which we have rated as Least Biased. In general, C-SPAN is unfiltered and minimally biased.
None to date.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate CTV News Least Biased based on balanced story selection and minimal use of emotional language. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
MediaBiasFactCheck: "Overall, we rate CTV News Least Biased based on balanced story selection and minimal use of emotional language. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record." (7/28/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 6/24/2019)
Established in 1961 and based in Canada, CTV News is the news division of CTV Television Network. The CTV News website features Canada and world news, politics, sports, entertainment, and more. CTV News's parent company BCE Inc. (formerly: Bell Canada Enterprises), was founded by Charles Fleetford Sise in 1880. Charles Fleetford Sise was the second president of Bell Canada (formerly: The Bell Telephone Company of Canada).
CTV Inc. owns CTV News, a subdivision of Bell Media Inc., a subsidiary of BCE Inc. (formerly: Bell Canada Enterprises), a holding company for Bell Canada. Bell Media is headquartered in East Toronto, Ontario. Gordon M. Nixon is Chair of the Board of both BCE Inc. and Bell Canada. George Cope is the President & Chief Executive Officer of BCE Inc. and bell canada
CTV News revenue is based on advertising and can find financial reports here. In review, CTV News republishes articles from Further, CTV News publishes its own articles written by journalists such as "Truth Tracker: No, Justin Trudeau isn't converting from Christianity to Islam." Justin Trudeau is the current Prime Minister of Canada. He is also the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada (Center-Left). When publishing articles regarding conservative Doug Ford, there is slightly loaded language such as this: "Doug Ford's chief of staff resigns one day after appointment controversy." This story is sourced from the Editorially, CTV News does not endorse political candidates. Further, they do not publish opinion content; however, the website does publish the political blog of Don Martin, who tends to lean right with his posts. None to date.Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to controversies and multiple failed fact checks.
Type: news aggregation website.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
According to its about page,
According to a Washington Post article, Editor-in-Chief
In review,
Fact Check: Was A 'Huge Percentage' of Deported Salvadorans Killed or Harmed Upon Return To El Salvador? - False
"Stephen Paddock used guns that are more powerful and accurate than what Marine infantry carry - and they're totally legal to buy," - False
Orange County Supervisor Don Wagner expressed genuine concern over "tracking devices" when he asked a health official about their potential presence in COVID-19 vaccines during a county board meeting. - False
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to founding and association with disinformationist Tucker Carlson.
DailyCaller.com: About Us: Founded in 2010 by Tucker Carlson, ...
Wikipedia entry.
The
The
In June 2020,
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Bias Rating: RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2010, the
The
In review, the
The
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Daily Dot Left Biased based on editorial positions that mostly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2011 by Nicholas White, who is also the current editor, The Daily Dot is a digital media company covering internet culture, politics, and life on the web. According to their about page "In 2011, he launched The Daily Dot as a paper of record for the Web, utilizing little more than Google docs, a newsletter, and a small editorial team."
The Daily Dot is owned by Daily Dot, LLC, which is based in Austin, Texas. Revenue is primarily derived from advertising.
In review, The Daily Dot mostly covers technology news but also covers culture and politics. For the purpose of this review we will focus on politics. The Daily Dot, at worst uses moderately loaded language in headlines with most being minimal such as this: "MAGA bomber sentenced to 20 years in prison." This story is properly sourced. When reporting on President Trump The Daily Dot does not have a favorable view, with articles such as this: "WTF was Donald Trump doing with his hand at last night's rally?" and this: "The latest terrifying deepfake combines Donald Trump and Mr. Bean." This story is also appropriately sourced to credible left-leaning sources such as
When it comes to science, they support the consensus across the board such as this on GMOs: "Nobel laureates urge Greenpeace to drop its crusade against GMOs." In general, The Daily Dot holds a strong left-leaning editorial position, while reporting news factually and with evidence.
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Wikipedia entry.
Daily Kos is a group blog and internet forum focused on the Democratic Party and liberal American politics. The site includes glossaries and other content. It is sometimes considered an example of "netroots" activism. Daily Kos was founded in 2002 by Markos Moulitsas and takes the name Kos from the last syllable of his first name, his nickname while in the military.
Overall, we rate the Daily Kos strongly Left Biased based on story selection that almost exclusively favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to non-vetted content and a few failed fact check and misleading claims.
Factual Reporting: MIXED.
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to tabloid journalism, and other concerns (below).
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck: "QUESTIONABLE SOURCE. Overall, we rate the Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor information sourcing."
Questionable Reasoning: Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: United Kingdom (35/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY.
"Established in 1896 by Harold and Alfred Harmsworth and Kennedy Jones, The Daily Mail is a tabloid newspaper in the U.K.. It is edited by Geordie Greig, who took over as editor in November 2018 from Paul Dacre, who had been the editor since 1992. The Daily Mail's parent company is DMGT, which owns newspapers including the Daily Mail, the Mail on Sunday, and The Metro. The chairman is Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere, who inherited the media empire founded by his great-grandfather Harold and his brother Alfred a century earlier. Harold Sidney Harmsworth is also known to be an admirer of Mussolini and a supporter of Nazi Germany."
[MediaBiasFactCheck] Read our profile on U.K. government influence on media.
"The Daily Mail's parent company is Daily Mail, and General Trust or DMGT and its chairman are Jonathan Harmsworth who inherited the media empire founded by his great-grandfather Harold Sidney Harmsworth. The Executive Committee is listed on their about page."
"DMGT also publishes the Mail on Sunday and Metro titles. Besides journalism, DMGT includes risk management, event organization such as conferences, training sessions, seminars and is the largest shareholder in property portal Zoopla, sold to Silver Lake. The main revenue of the Daily Mail is digital advertising, print ads, and subscription fees. You can find their 2018 assets report here."
"The Daily Mail is a known supporter of the Conservatives. They are also one of the pro-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brexit tabloids. According to a
"In review, the Daily Mail tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wordings such as "Woman, 63, 'becomes PREGNANT in the mouth' with baby squid after eating calamari", which is a misleading headline. In 2017, Wikipedia banned the Daily Mail as an 'unreliable' source. When it comes to sourcing information, they use minimal hyperlinked sourcing as well as sourcing to themselves. In general, most stories favor the right; however, the Daily Mail will report either side of the story is sensational enough."
"Overall, we rate Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor information sourcing." (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 3/10/2021)
[BBC News, 2021-04-21] Daily Mail owner sues Google over search results. The owner of the Daily Mail newspaper and MailOnline website is suing Google over allegations the search engine manipulates search results. | Hacker News [2021-04-21]
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to tabloid journalism, and other concerns (below).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Telegraph Right Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and some failed fact checks.
Bias Rating: RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
... in 1969, it became The Daily Telegraph, sometimes referred to as The Telegraph. The Telegraph covers news, politics, sports, technology, business, money, opinion, lifestyle, and travel. Chris Evans is the editor, Nick Hugh is the CEO of The Telegraph, and David King is the Executive Director at Telegraph Media Group (TMG).
Telegraph Media Group (TMG) owns The Telegraph, which is owned by Press Acquisitions Ltd., which in turn is owned by Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay. In 2004, Twin Brothers Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay acquired The Daily Telegraph and the Sunday Telegraph from the Canadian media company Hollinger Inc. [Conrad Black] for Β£665 million. For a complete list of Board members, see here. The Telegraph Media Group's 2017 Financial results can be found here. The Telegraph is subscription-based, and only subscribers have unlimited access to Premium articles. They also rely on advertising to generate revenue.
According to the Financial Times, in 2015, The Telegraph urged its readers to vote Conservative via email from its editor Chris Evans. As a result, the paper was fined Β£30,000 by the data regulator, the independent office that regulates the organization's data use. Further, The Telegraph is strongly biased in favor of the Conservative party, earning the nickname "Daily Torygraph."
During the 2017 elections, The Telegraph backed Theresa May ( Prime Minister and Leader of the Conservative Party since 2016): "Vote Conservative for an independent, prosperous Britain." Here is a quote from the article demonstrating conservative bias "Only Theresa May has the attitude and the experience necessary to get the job done - and to get it done in the cleanest, most comprehensive way. Jeremy Corbyn is not only incompetent and wrongheaded but dangerous." They also publish articles strongly biased against the Labor party such as this: "A Corbyn government would be a calamity - everything else is just noise."
The Telegraph also republishes stories from credible news media such as
The Telegraph regularly utilizes emotionally loaded language in their headlines and source poorly, either through quotations or self-referral sourcing to themselves. They also routinely publish clickbait tabloid-style news such as "Is this workout the secret to Jennifer Aniston's youthful physique at 50?" and crime stories in their News section: "Libby Squire suspect charged with stealing sex toys and knickers from other women months before the disappearance of student."
Recently, The Telegraph issued an apology letter to Melania Trump for publishing false statements regarding her family and her modeling career and also agreed to pay substantial damages' over the article they published about the First Lady.
The U.K's independent fact-checker, Full Fact, has found several false claims by The Telegraph. Climate Feedback has also found misleading information regarding human-influenced climate change [i.e.; climate change].
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Wikipedia entry
The Daily Wire is an American conservative news website and media company founded in 2015 by political commentator Ben Shapiro and director Jeremy Boreing.
The Daily Wire was conceived by Ben Shapiro and Jeremy Boreing, who both worked for TruthRevolt, a news website that was formerly funded by the David Horowitz Freedom Center. After the Ben Shapiro and Jeremy Boreing secured several million dollars in seed funding from the billionaire brothers Dan Howard Wilks and Farris Cullen Wilks, The Daily Wire was launched in 2015. Farris Wilks manages Forward Publishing LLC, which publishes The Daily Wire. The website's headquarters were in Los Angeles, California. In September 2020, Shapiro announced that The Daily Wire headquarters would move to Nashville, Tennessee.
Dan Howard Wilks and Farris Cullen Wilks, also known as the Wilks Brothers, are American petroleum industry businessmen. Sons of a bricklayer, the Wilks brothers established Wilks Masonry in 1995. The Wilks brothers went on to found an early hydraulic fracking company, Frac Tech, in 2002, and eventually became billionaires. In 2011 the Wilks brothers sold their 70% interest in Frac Tech for $3.5 billion. The Wilks brothers reside in Cisco, Texas.
The Wilks brothers are major funders of conservative causes, including The Daily Wire, PragerU (a recipient of funding from DonorsTrust), and the 2016 presidential campaign of Senator Ted Cruz.
[ ... snip ... ]
The Wilks brothers -- along with political commentator Ben Shapiro - helped launch and fund The Daily Wire, a conservative news and opinion website in 2015. Additionally, the Wilks Brothers provided early stage funding to PragerU, a conservative YouTube channel and media company started by Dennis Prager to further conservative causes. The Wilks brothers are major donors to conservative advocacy group Empower Texans.
[ ... snip ... ]
According to Snopes, "DailyWire.com has a tendency to share stories that are taken out of context or not verified", including reports on protesters digging up Confederate graves, Democratic congresspeople refusing to stand for a fallen Navy SEAL's widow, and Harvard University holding segregated commencement ceremonies. The credibility checker NewsGuard assessed that The Daily Wire "severely violates basic standards of credibility and transparency", "often misstates facts to advance partisan opinion" and "frequently publishes false and misleading information, particularly in stories about abortion".
The Daily Wire published articles expressing skepticism that climate change is occurring and that humans contribute to climate change. Climate scientists have described the articles as being inaccurate and misleading.
The Daily Wire incorrectly credited the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) secretary, Ben Carson, with finding over $500 billion in accounting errors made by the Obama administration. FactCheck.org reported that the errors were discovered and published by HUD's independent inspector general before Ben Carson became secretary.
The investigative website
The Daily Wire MediaBiasFactcheck entry: QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
"A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources."
"Overall, we rate The Daily Wire Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that align with the conservative right. We also rate Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks."
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY.
"The Daily Wire is a politically conservative American news and opinion website founded in 2015 by conservative political commentator Ben Shapiro, who currently serves as Editor-in-Chief. Michael Knowles is managing editor, and Jeremy Boreing is Chief Operating Officer."
"Read our profile on the United States government and media."
"Forward Publishing LLC owns The Daily Wire. Forward Publishing is owned and managed by the billionaire Wilks Brothers, who made their money through the fossil fuel industry with their company Frac Tech. The Wilks brothers are also a part of the extreme Christian Right who interpret the bible literally. The website is funded through a subscription and advertising model."
"The Daily Wire presents news with a hyper-partisan conservative bias in reporting and wording. For example, headlines are usually sensational and utilize strong emotional language such as this: "Democrats Boo God. Then They Quote The Bible To Attack Trump." Virtually every story favors the right and denigrates the left. However, The Daily Wire does not always report favorably on President Trump and his policies. When it comes to science, they often do not align with climate scientists' consensus that humans are a significant factor in climate change. See the fact checks below."
[ ... snip ... ]
"Overall, we rate The Daily Wire Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that align with the conservative right. We also rate The Daily Wire Questionable due to The Daily Wire's promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks. (9/2/2016) Updated (
The Daily Wire's About page [captured 2021-04-23].
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate DCReport at the end of left-center bias and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize. Concerns include the continual shilling of the U.S. Navy / TTSA / Luis Elizondo / Chris Mellon / ... Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) "threat" trope.
Homepage:
Rebelliously Curious in Exploring Frontier Science and Innovative Technology.
Transparency, whether in areas of government or media and journalism, is of great importance to us.
Our complete Mission Statement, which covers many of our goals and interests, can be read online here.
Wikipedia, Democracy_Now!:
Bias Rating: LEFT BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1996,
According to their about page, "
In review,
None to date.
Website: DeSmog.com
Wikipedia entry.
...
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The
The
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources: conspiracy-driven disinformation website.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Disclose TV a Tin Foil Hat conspiracy website that is low in factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks and a lack of transparency.
Bias Rating: CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE | Factual Reporting: LOW | MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Founded in 2007, Disclose TV is a website that allows users to share news stories. According to their about page, "The users of our online community create a unique pool of unfiltered, wide-ranging, non-partisan, independent and highly topical content daily that can be drawn upon to extrapolate a comprehensive and in many cases startlingly vivid picture of what is taking place." The website does reveal the identity of their editor; however, they do list Lukas as Site Administrator. This link leads to a "page not found."
Disclose TV is owned by Futurebytes GmbH & Co. KG since 2008. Futurebytes is a limited partnership with a limited liability company as a general partner. Advertising generates revenue. >> "Futurebytes GmbH & Co. KG was founded in 2009 and has grown into a leading Private Equity Company. Since our establishment, we've invested in and partnered with a number of well-known startups that are doing great things in their respective fields. When it comes to investing, there's no such thing as approaching us too early. In fact, the earlier we come on board, the better."
In review, the users of Disclose TV publish news stories that are often conspiratorial and sometimes just fake. They also publish some legitimate articles as well. Disclose TV frequently publishes news about aliens and UFOs such as this: "UFO sighing in the Philippines." They also promote stories regarding chemtrails, anti-vaccination propaganda as well as
A factual search reveals 10+ failed fact checks. Further, Disclose TV is also on Politifact's Fake News List.
Overall, we rate Disclose TV a Tin Foil Hat conspiracy website that is low in factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks and a lack of transparency. (
[Logically.ai, 2022-01-12] Disclose.tv: Conspiracy Forum Turned Disinformation Factory.
Currently, Disclose.tv operates its main website, as well as accounts on Twitter (801K followers), Telegram (394K followers), YouTube (12K followers), Facebook (3 million followers), Gettr (583K followers), and Gab (180K followers). On these platforms, Disclose.tv functions as a news aggregator, largely sharing information from other news sources, often without attribution or without links to other news sites. Its most popular posts tend to be videos or photos taken from other accounts. Its
Disclose.tv consistently pushes
The earliest archived version of Disclose.tv dates back to 2007-03-22 - but Disclose.tv today is a far cry from its initial form. In its initial form, Disclose.tv focused primarily on
[ ... snip ... ]
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
"... The editorial stance of The Economist primarily revolves around classical, social, and most notably, economic liberalism. Since its founding, it has supported radical centrism, favoring policies and governments that maintain centrist politics. The newspaper typically champions neoliberalism, particularly free markets, free trade, free immigration, deregulation, and globalisation.
"Despite a pronounced editorial stance, it is seen as having little reporting bias, rigorous fact checking and strict copy editing. Its extensive use of word play, subscription prices, and typical depth of coverage has linked the paper with a high-income and educated readership, drawing both positive and negative connotations in the Western world. In line with this, it claims to have influential readership of prominent business leaders and policy-makers. ..."
Editor (2015-present): Susan Jean Elisabeth "Zanny" Minton Beddoes
"Pearson plc held a 50% shareholding via the Financial Times Limited until August 2015. At that time, Pearson sold their share in the Economist. The Agnelli family's Exor paid Β£287m to raise their stake from 4.7% to 43.4% while the Economist paid Β£182m for the balance of 5.04m shares which will be distributed to current shareholders. Aside from the Agnelli family, smaller shareholders in the company include Cadbury, Rothschild (21%), Schroder, Layton, and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders. A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. The Economist Newspaper Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Economist Group. Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild was Chairman of the company from 1972 to 1989.
"Although The Economist has a global emphasis and scope, about two-thirds of the 75 staff journalists are based in the London borough of Westminster. However, due to half of all subscribers originating in the United States, The Economist has core editorial offices and substantial operations in New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington D.C.
"Though it has many individual columns, by tradition and current practice the newspaper ensures a uniform voice - aided by the anonymity of writers - throughout its pages, as if most articles were written by a single author ..."
"Articles often take a definite editorial stance and almost never carry a byline. Not even the name of the editor is printed in the issue. It is a long-standing tradition that an editor's only signed article during their tenure is written on the occasion of their departure from the position. The author of a piece is named in certain circumstances: when notable persons are invited to contribute opinion pieces; when journalists of The Economist compile special reports (previously known as surveys); for the Year in Review special edition; and to highlight a potential conflict of interest over a book review. The names of The Economist editors and correspondents can be located on the media directory pages of the website. ..."
"... American author and long-time reader Michael Lewis criticised the paper's editorial anonymity in 1991, labelling it a means to hide the youth and inexperience of those writing articles. Although individual articles are written anonymously, there is no secrecy over who the writers are, as they are listed on The Economist's website, which also provides summaries of their careers and academic qualifications. Later, in 2009, Lewis included multiple Economist articles in his anthology about the 2008 financial crisis, Panic: The Story of Modern Financial Insanity.
"John Ralston Saul describes The Economist as a "...[newspaper] which hides the names of the journalists who write its articles in order to create the illusion that they dispense disinterested truth rather than opinion. This sales technique, reminiscent of pre-Reformation Catholicism, is not surprising in a publication named after the social science most given to wild guesses and imaginary facts presented in the guise of inevitability and exactitude. That it is the Bible of the corporate executive indicates to what extent received wisdom is the daily bread of a managerial civilization."
COMMENT (Persagen). The neoliberal, conservative stance of The Economist - cloaked in anonymity, as discussed in the Wikipedia article, above - raises significant concern regarding unstated intentions and aims of The Economist and its contributors.
For example, the Trump administrations eviscerated transgender rights, orchestrated as a long-term goal of the Christian Right and virulently transphobic arch conservative groups such as The Heritage Foundation (former member Roger Severino, funded in part by the DeVos family). That effort, funded by dark money sources and donations, form the tip of a spear that attacks individual rights and freedoms, using transpersons as a target of derision and exclusion.
Following Trump's defeat in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, those carefully-crafted attacks on transpersons have intensified - reinforced by inflammatory rhetoric that attacks transgender youth: participation in school sports, and access to health care (counseling and hormonal therapy).
In that regard, any recent web search of The Economist and "transgender" will reveal numerous articles published by The Economist, biased against transpersons, that reinforce and propagate the transphobic attacks against transpersons disguised as "discussions."
[Economist.com, 2021-05-15] Doubts are growing about therapy for gender-dysphoric children. Drug treatments seem to do little good, and may be harmful.
MediaBiasFactCheck: "Overall, we rate The Economist Least Biased based on balanced reporting and High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record."
History. "Founded in 1843, The Economist is an English-language weekly news magazine that is edited in London, U.K.. The current editor is Zanny Minton Beddoes. According to their about page The Economist "is neither right nor left but a blend of the two, drawing on the classical liberalism of the 19th century and coming from what we like to call the radical centre."
Funded by / Ownership. "The Economist is owned by the Economist Group, which is a British multinational media company. The Economist Group is primary owned by the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Layton and Agnelli families. The Economist is funded through subscriptions, advertising and sponsored content."
Analysis / Bias. "In review, The Economist takes an editorial stance of classical and economic liberalism that supports free trade, globalization, open immigration, and social liberalism. There is minimal use of loaded language in both headlines and articles such as this: "America's new attitude towards China is changing the countries' relationship." In fact, most articles are well written with very low emotional bias. Economically, The Economist leans right, but they also support such initiatives as a carbon tax and environmental protectionism, which are not right wing positions. Editorially, The Economist endorses both
"A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 59% of The Economist's audience is consistently or mostly liberal, 24% Mixed and 18% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that The Economist is preferred by a more liberal audience."
"A factual search reveals that The Economist has never failed a fact check."
[Economist.com, 2020-10-17] The pandemic has eroded democracy and respect for human rights. Strongmen have taken advantage of COVID-19 in numerous ways.
COMMENT (Persagen). While mentioning Brazil, Turkey, Russia ... this article does not mention any of: Donald Trump | Mitch McConnell | William Barr | Black Lives Matter | U.S. | U.S. | United States | U.S. protests | contact tracing | ...
Website: Engadget.com
Wikipedia, 2022-01-14:
MediaBiasFactCheck.com, 2021-02-16: overall, we rate
Founded in 2004,
Formerly owned by
In review,
Editorially,
None in the Last 5 years.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
See main entries: The Epoch Times | New Tang Dynasty Television:
... The Epoch Times is a far-right international multi-language newspaper and media company affiliated with the Falun Gong new religious movement. The newspaper, based in New York City, is part of the Epoch Media Group, which also operates New Tang Dynasty (NTD) Television. The Epoch Times has websites in 35 countries but is blocked in mainland China. ...
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Falun Gong operates a questionable "news" organization - The Epoch Times - and allied organizations such as the China Tribunal and its affiliates are similarly biased viz-a-viz China and it's dissidents.
MediaBiasFactCheck: "Overall, we rate The Epoch Times borderline Questionable and Right Biased based on editorial positions that consistently favor the right. We also rate The Epoch Times factually Mixed due to the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of pro-Trump propaganda and conspiracy theories as well as failed fact checks."
Source for the following summary: Wikipedia.
The Epoch Times is a far-right international multi-language newspaper and media company affiliated with the Falun Gong new religious movement. The newspaper, based in New York City, is part of the Epoch Media Group, which also operates New Tang Dynasty (NTD) Television. The Epoch Times has websites in 35 countries but is blocked in mainland China.
The Epoch Times opposes the Chinese Communist Party, promotes far-right politicians in Europe, and has backed President Donald Trump in the U.S.; a 2019 report by
... According to
... The Epoch Times is an ardent opponent of the Chinese Communist Party. Since a shift in the newspaper's approach in 2016, the newspaper received significant attention for its favorable coverage of the Trump administration, the German far-right, and the French far-right ... Since 2016, according to
... The Epoch Times has spread misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic in print and via social media including Facebook and YouTube. ... The misinformation tracker NewsGuard called the French page of The Epoch Times one of the "super-spreaders" of COVID-19 misinformation on Facebook, citing an Epoch Times article that suggested the virus was artificially created. NewsGuard later changed the rating of the English edition of The Epoch Times from green to red. ...
... The Epoch Times publishes a web series with the conservative commentator Lawrence Allen "Larry" Elder, a candidate in the 2021 recall election against California governor
... In December 2019, the English Wikipedia deprecated the English and Chinese online versions of The Epoch Times as an "unreliable source" to use as a reference in Wikipedia, with editors describing it as "an advocacy group for the Falun Gong, and... a biased or opinionated source that frequently publishes conspiracy theories."
[theGuardian.com, 2021-09-16] Facebook steps up fight against climate misinformation - but critics say effort falls short. New efforts will let vast amounts of false material slip through the cracks, according to climate advocates. | Almost all of the climate misinformation about the 2021 power outages in Texas went unchecked, one study found. | "We cannot solve social media disinformation by playing an endless game of Whac-a-Mole with known liars."
[ ... snip ... ]
Past studies have revealed other climate crisis-denying posts and resources outpacing accurate information on the platform. In 2021 June, one of the most-viewed sites on Facebook was a subscription page for The Epoch Times, a far-right newspaper known for climate change denial.
[ ... snip ... ]
π STOP! Excluded from sources: notorious disinformation source.
Type: news aggregation website.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL.
Launched on a limited basis in 2019-10 and fully to mobile users in 2020-06,
Determining the bias of news curators/aggregators is different than from a single source that produces original content. The wording on
Our methodology for the review of
The results conclude that more stories are served from left-leaning sources (76%) than the right (16%). It should be noted that we are not stating
Overall, we rate
A
On 2021-12-17 the
[BMJ.com, 2021-12-17]
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) Left-Center biased based on slightly favoring the left politically and High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing of information.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1986, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) is a media criticism organization based in New York City. The organization was founded by Jeff Cohen and Martin A. Lee. FAIR monitors the U.S. news media for "inaccuracy, bias, and censorship" and advocates for a greater diversity of perspectives in news reporting. It is opposed to corporate ownership of media entities and calls for the break-up of media conglomerates. In other words, it holds a progressive stance.
FAIR is a nonprofit that is funded through donations and a store that sells products.
In review, articles generally use moderate to low biased words in both headlines and articles such as: 'The Rule Is Designed to Deter People From Reporting'. This story is very well sourced to credible media that we rate High for factual reporting. Although FAIR stories tend to favor the left politically they are all sourced properly and written in a mostly neutral tone.
A factual search reveals that FAIR has not failed a fact check.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks | Bias Rating: RIGHT | MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY.
Wikipedia,
During the
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to
See also;
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL.
According to the
In review,
Editorially,
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the Financial Times Least Biased based on balanced reporting and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1888, the Financial Times is an English-language international broadsheet daily newspaper with a special emphasis on business and economic news. The paper originates from London, U.K. The current editor is Lionel Barber.
According to the Global Capital Markets Survey, which measures readership habits amongst most senior financial decision-makers in the world's largest financial institutions, the Financial Times is considered the most important business read, reaching 36% of the sample population, 11% more than The Wall Street Journal, its main rival.
The Financial Times is owned by The Nikkei, a Japanese news and financial information company that publishes the leading financial paper The Nikkei. The Financial Times generates revenue through subscriptions, a hard paywall, and advertising.
In review, the Financial Times primarily reports economic news with a minimally biased tone such as this: "Trump calls on China to drop levies on U.S. farm products." This story, like all others on the website, is properly sourced. Editorially, the Financial Times sticks to economics and how politics impacts it. There is, again, minimal bias in reporting. In general, Financial Times reports straight news with minimal bias and proper sourcing.
None to date.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate FiveThirtyEight (538) Left-Center Biased based on story selection that slightly favors the left but does not favor the progressive left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information, a solid record with poll analysis, and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Five Thirty-Eight, sometimes referred to as 538, focuses on opinion poll analysis, politics, economics, and sports blogging. The website, which takes its name from the number of electors in the United States electoral college, was founded on March 7, 2008, as a polling aggregation website with a blog created by analyst Nate Silver.
In 2013, ESPN became the owner of FiveThirtyEight, and in April 2018, the site was acquired by ABC News.
FiveThirtyEight is owned by ABC News, which in turn is owned by In review, FiveThirtyEight is different from other polling sources in that they do not conduct the polls but rather deeply analyze other polls and apply a strict methodology to determine accuracy. For example, Real Clear Politics takes all polls averages to develop a score, whereas 538 uses weights on each poll based on demographics and much more. One can argue this is more accurate and 538's early track record proved it was. However, in 2016 they gave President Trump a 29% chance of winning. This does not mean they were wrong because they still had a 29% chance of being correct, but they clearly were not very close on this one with their methods. 538 also reports news on their website that tends to lean left; however, they have been criticized as opposed to the progressive left. News articles typically utilize moderate to minimally loaded language, such as "How Amy Klobuchar Could Win The 2020 Democratic nomination." This article relies on proper sourcing from the likes of In general, 538 tends to stick to poll-related news, but they usually slightly favor the left through story selection and wording when discussing politics. None to date.Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
π STOP! Excluded from sources: ownership with ties to
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
In 2014, the Hong Kong-based investor group called
In review,
Politically,
A factual search reveals that
President
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize; given the statement (below) "[Fortune Magazine] always have a favorable view of business interests and limited government," there is some concern regarding neoliberal and libertarian ideologies.
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Fortune Magazine Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions that favor business and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1929 by Henry Luce, Fortune Magazine is an American multinational business magazine headquartered in New York City, United States. The magazine regularly publishes ranked lists, including the Fortune 500, a ranking of companies by revenue published annually since 1955. The current editor is Clifton Leaf.
Fortune Magazine is published by Fortune Media Group Holdings and owned by Thai businessman Chatchaval Jiaravanon. Fortune generates revenue through advertising and subscription fees.
In review, Fortune Magazine reports on business news with a clear distinction between straight news and opinion pieces. Articles do not use loaded language such as "How Bill and Melinda Gates Are Transforming Life for Billions in the 21st Century." This story, like all on Fortune Magazine, is properly sourced to credible media. While Fortune Magazine does not always have a favorable view of President Trump, they always have a favorable view of business interests and limited government. When it comes to science, Fortune Magazine supports the consensus of scientists on issues such as climate change.
Overall, we rate Fortune Magazine Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions that favor business and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. (
π STOP! Excluded from sources (notoriously egregious disinformation source).
Refer here: Fox News [Rupert Murdoch]
See also Rupert Murdoch's Media Holdings, which disambiguates and clarifies Rupert Murdoch's media empire (past and present).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: we rate Fox News strongly Right-Biased due to editorial positions and story selection that favors the right. We also rate them Mixed factually and borderline Questionable based on poor sourcing and the spreading of conspiracy theories.
Bias Rating: RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
... In 2018-10, Fox News added to their terms of use that they are an entertainment company. ...
Rupert Murdoch is the owner and a board member of News Corp [
Rupert Murdoch owns the notorious (reprehensible) disinformation source, stridently pro-Trump Fox News network. Accordingly, any information spawned by that sprawling network (including the sources below) must be scrutinized with extreme care, as potential (probable) disinformation sources.
This is exemplary re: the Fox News disinformation universe.
[BoingBoing.net, 2020-03-18] WATCH: Fox News hosts say coronavirus is fake news, then change their tune.
What a damning indictment of Fox News from the Post video team here. pic.twitter.com/r8Fz8vo5KV
-- andrew kaczynski π€ (@KFILE) March 18, 2020
[Twitter.com, 2020-03-17] What a damning indictment of Fox News from the Post video team here.
[video] π€ @KFILE: What a damning indictment of Fox News from the Post video team here.
[Source]
In this video, assembled by The Washington Post's media team, Fox News hosts and their rhetoric is contrasted just a few days apart. Then, they were claiming coronavirus was either nothing to worry about or an outright hoax; now they are solemnly telling people to look out for themselves as the virus rages.
The Georgia Straight - Wikipedia entry, 2021-11-13:
The Georgia Straight is a free Canadian weekly news and entertainment newspaper published in a large 'tabloid' format in Vancouver, British Columbia, by the Vancouver Free Press Publishing Corp. Often known simply as The Straight, it is delivered to newsboxes, post-secondary schools, public libraries and a large variety of other locations.
As surveyed by VAC its per-issue circulation average as of January 25, 2011, is 119,971 copies, and its average weekly readership is 804,000 as of 2009. Its website traffic ranked 92,215 globally and 5,395 within Canada, according to November 2, 2021, figures from
In January 2020, the newspaper's acquisition by Media Central Corporation was announced, a few weeks after the same company announced a deal to acquire the similar Toronto publication Now.
[ ... snip ... ]
On March 2, 2020, Media Central Corporation Inc. announced it has closed its acquisition of Vancouver Free Press Corp, owner and operator of The Georgia Straight. The company paid $1.25 million (included fees associated with the transaction) in cash and shares.
[ ... snip ... ]
The Straight carries feature articles, ranging from social topics, such as drug use and gentrification to in-depth looks at cultural newsmakers like the writer Salman Rushdie. Writer Charlie Smith has a record of covering women's movement issues as well. There are also many advertiser-related articles and listings on lifestyle and entertainment, commenting on restaurants, new wines, new gadgets, designer clothes, and the latest in music, theatre and movies. Rounding out the regular features are the well-known American advice columnist Dan Savage with his Savage Love, commentator Gwynne Dyer, cartoons, and a local astrology column. The newspaper's editorial slant is strongly left-wing as conceived in the Canadian political spectrum.
Special editions of The Straight include:
The Golden Plate Awards - March
The Best of Vancouver - September
The Best of Vancouver is a well known feature with whimsical notions of the best place for outdoor sex mixed in with more conventional awards such as Best Dining, Best Bar & Club, and Best Radio Station.
The Straight has been criticised for publishing cigarette and other tobacco advertising when most publications in Canada have declined to do so for moral and ethical reasons. And of promoting local events that had tobacco industry sponsorship, such as the formerly Benson and Hedges-sponsored Symphony of Fire. The Straight has long been condemned for this practice by the major health groups and, more recently, by Vancouver businessman and political candidate Dale Jackaman in a series of
The paper has received many awards. For example, in 1995, it received five "Western Magazine Awards", and, in the two years up to June 1996, it was nominated more than forty times and won twenty prizes, including three National Magazine Awards. In 1999, The Straight won eight Western Magazine Awards, including "Magazine of the Year", and its seventh consecutive, "Best Business Article".
On May 23, 2009, The Georgia Straight won the prize for "best magazine article of the year" for "The Pill Pushers" by Alex Roslin from the Canadian Association of Journalists.
The paper also gives many awards based on readers' polls:
". . . the Golden Plate Awards for local restaurants, The Straight Music Awards for local musicians, and the Best of Vancouver Awards for every type of business, service, activity, and weird stuff in the city, from the best bowling alley to the best Vancouver excuse for being late for work."
Wikipedia, 2022-02-14:
In July 2010,
MediaBiasFactCheck.com (2020-12-23): overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1994,
In review,
None in the Last 5 years.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Conspiracy-Pseudoscience. Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.
Overall, we rate GlobalResearch [https://www.globalresearch.ca/] a Tin Foil Hat Conspiracy and Strong Pseudoscience website based on the promotion of unproven information such as the dangers of Vaccines and 9-11 as a false flag operation.
History. Founded in 2001, GlobalResearch or Centre for Research on Globalization is a Canadian conspiracy website. It was founded by Michel Chossudovsky who is currently the President of GlobalResearch and professor emeritus of economics at the University of Ottawa. The website does not have an about page, but they do list the people involved with the operation.
Funded by / Ownership. Although GlobalResearch does not state ownership, it is assumed Michel Chossudovsky is the owner. Revenue is derived through donations and advertising.
Analysis / Bias. In review, GlobalResearch publishes a combination of real news and conspiracy theories. We will focus on the not so real news. GlobalResearch often reports unfavorably about Israel such as this: "The Zionist Idea Has Never Been More Terrifying than It Is Today." This unlabeled opinion piece does not provide a single source of evidence for their claims. When it comes to politics they are strongly anti-capitalism and anti-Globalist as their name suggests. While GlobalResearch does promote legitimate humanitarian concerns, its views on science, economics, and geopolitics are very questionable. For example, GR promotes anti-vaccination propaganda, 9-11 as a false flag operation, GMOs are harmful, and Chemtrails. There are so many more, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Conclusion. In general, this is a website the purports to be concerned for humanity, yet routinely publishes false information that misleads humanity. Overall, we rate GlobalResearch a Tin Foil Hat Conspiracy and Strong Pseudoscience website based on the promotion of unproven information such as the dangers of Vaccines, and 9-11 as a false flag operation. (
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize over concern regarding potential neoliberal and libertarian ideologies.
Wikipedia entry | Controversies
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Founded in 1844,
None to date.
Go.com. Owned by Disney Parks; hosts ABCNews.go.com/ and https://ESPN.go.com (redirects to ESPN.com).
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize - due in part to ownership by
Type: news aggregation website.
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Determining the bias of a news aggregator is different than from a single source that produces original content. The wording on
Another method we used was to look at what sources were being used in the categories of "U.S. News" and "World News." Over the course of three days, we looked at the top 25 sources in each category for a total of 150 sources calculated. We then compared these sources to our bias ratings and calculated what percentage comes from each bias category. Overall, the majority of stories on
It should be noted that we are not stating
A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 37% of
Overall, we rate
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Max Blumenthal established and writes for theGrayZone.com - which purports to be an independent investigative journalism site, but is tainted by Blumenthal and his associations (e.g.) with
Max Blumenthal has broadcast on
In an interview with Tucker Carlson on Fox News in November 2017, Max Blumenthal defended
Max Blumenthal founded The Grayzone website a month after his visit to Moscow. Gilbert Achcar wrote in an October 2019 article for New Politics magazine that along with the World Socialist Web Site, Blumenthal's Grayzone has "the habit of demonizing all left-wing critics of Putin and the likes of Assad by describing them as 'agents of imperialism' or some equivalent."
Autobiographical statements on theGrayZone.com (founded by Max Blumenthal) paint a glowing self-tribute,
Max Blumenthal is an award-winning journalist and the author of several books, including best-selling Republican Gomorrah, Goliath, The Fifty One Day War, and The Management of Savagery. Max Blumenthal has produced print articles for an array of publications, many video reports, and several documentaries, including Killing Gaza. Blumenthal founded The Grayzone in 2015 to shine a journalistic light on America's state of perpetual war and its dangerous domestic repercussions."
However, even a cursory internet search reveals Max Blumenthal to be an infamous anti-Zionist, disinformation-spewing troll.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com; overall, we rate Grist Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that align with the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing, a clean fact check record, and adherence to scientific consensus.
Grist (originally Grist Magazine; also referred to as Grist.org) is an American non-profit online magazine publishing environmental news and commentary since 1999. Grist is a Pro-Science magazine that focuses on environmental issues. According to their about page, "Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future."
Grist Magazine Inc. owns the website. Advertising, grants, and donations fund Grist.
Grist publishes original articles and republishes from other sources primarily covering the environment and climate change. Original articles and headlines often contain loaded emotional wording that emphasizes the consequences of climate change, such as: As Arctic broils, world leaders convene in Iceland to talk climate change. This article, like most, is properly sourced to credible media outlets such as VOA News, CBS News, and
Editorially, Grist holds left-leaning positions on the environment and equity, frequently reporting negatively on conservatives such as this: "After a Trump-length pause, the EPA is relaunching a major climate change report." When reporting on Democrats, they tend to hold a favorable view Biden wants to balance infrastructure and conservation goals. But it won't be easy. In general, they report news factual and support the consensus of science while holding left-leaning viewpoints.
None to date.
See also:
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to tabloid journalism, and multiple failed fact checks.
Wikipedia (2021-09-27):
Editor-in-Chief
In an
Chief among the notable "scoops" obtained by the paper was the 2011
MediaBiasFactCheck.com:
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
Launched in 1821,
In review, story selection favors the left but is generally factual. They utilize emotionally loaded headlines such as ...
Numerous - see MediaBiasFactCheck.com entry!
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to staffing of known conspiracy theorist / The Hill columnist John Solomon.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Hill Least Biased based on balanced editorial positions and news reporting that is low biased. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to previous opinion columns promoting unproven claims.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The Hill is an American political journalism newspaper and website published in Washington, D.C., since 1994. The Hill focuses on politics, policy, business, and international relations. Their coverage includes the U.S. Congress, the presidency, and election campaigns. The current editor is Bob Cusack, who has been reporting on policy and politics in the nation's capital since 1995.
Capitol Hill Publishing publishes The Hill, whose parent company News Communications, Inc., is the owner. Jimmy Finkelstein is the current CEO of New Communications described as a "
In review, The Hill covers both sides on the political spectrum and generally sources information properly; however, they sometimes rush stories and have to change them after the fact. The Hill rarely uses loaded words in their headlines and articles such as this: "Trump says he won't sign GOP's compromise immigration bill." All news stories are sourced from either journalists in the field or credible media sources.
The Hill features editorial commentaries that provide a reasonably balanced group of columnist that consists of the following: ...
The Hill also features other outside opinion contributors such as Newt Gingrich, among other prominent figures. The general overall tone of all op-eds is currently balanced after dominant
The Hill has faced criticism for the hiring of John Solomon, who is described as a strong supporter of President Trump and a conspiracy theorist, with his previous opinion columns under review for false content. Further, reports indicate that owner Jimmy Finkelstein "kept a watchful eye on the newspaper's coverage to ensure it is not too critical of the President."
In general, news reporting is balanced and factual with a reasonably balanced Op-Ed page.
A factual search reveals The Hill has not failed any fact checks. However, they have rushed to publish breaking news that needed to be corrected or removed in the past. The Hill also published editorial commentary that has been labeled conspiratorial by other sources; however, this columnist is no longer with the paper.
π STOP! Excluded from sources: nebulous origin and individuals; non-original content.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the Hill Reporter Left biased based on story selection and wording that routinely favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
According to Whois, the domain was purchased in May of 2018, and the website launched shortly thereafter. The Hill Reporter describes themselves as "Our mission is to deliver factually correct news stories. We report on breaking political stories that speak to the current political climate in the United States."
The Hill Reporter was founded by three individuals, James Kosur, formerly an editor at Business Insider, and brothers Ed and Brian Krassenstein, members of the "#Resistance" to President Donald Trump.
The current managing editor is Brett D. Gilman.
In 2019, the website was purchased by Roman Romanuk, who is the CEO of Prezna, an internet marketing company based in Seattle, Washington.
[Comment [2021-10-07] : None of "James Kosur", "Ed Brian Krassenstein", "Brian Krassenstein", "Roman Romanuk", "Prezna" appear in Wikipedia.]
The website is owned by Roman Romanuk through its company Prezna. Revenue is derived through online advertising.
In review, the Hill Reporter rarely publishes original news reporting but rather reports on existing news stories through staff writers. Story selection is strongly left-leaning featuring moderately loaded emotional language such as this ...
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources: founded by
Update [2021-12-14]: the MediaBiasFactCheck.com analysis below is dated and superseded by the comprehensive Persagen.com analysis of the {BuzzFeed - Huffington Post / HuffPost - Vox Media} domain, consolidated under the BuzzFeed entry (above).
Type: news aggregation website.
See also: BuzzFeed News, currently owned by Verizon Media [now
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate HuffPost Left-Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and the promotion of pseudoscience.
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2005, HuffPost, also known as The Huffington Post, is a news and commentary site headquartered in New York City. The Huffington Post was founded by
In March 2011, AOL acquired The Huffington Post for $315 million. Arianna Huffington was named president and editor-in-chief of The Huffington Post Media Group, which included AOL properties, Engadget, and
The HuffPost is currently owned by Oath Inc., which is a subsidiary of Verizon Communications. In November 2020, BuzzFeed acquired the HuffPost; however, they will maintain separate newsrooms. The website generates revenue through advertising.
Yahoo is an American multinational technology company that focuses on media and online business. Verizon Communications acquired AOL in 2015. When Verizon Communications purchased Yahoo! in 2017, it merged AOL and Yahoo! into a subsidiary named Oath Inc.
In review, HuffPost publishes stories with strong emotionally loaded headlines such as "Comey Flips: 'Vote for Democrats This Fall'," and "Trump Calls Female Reporter 'So Obnoxious,' Tells Her To Be Quiet." They utilize credible sources such as CBS News,
A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 59% of HuffPost's audience is consistently or primarily liberal, 23% Mixed, and 17% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that a more liberal audience prefers HuffPost. In general, a review of articles shows that more favor the left than the right. While HuffPost primarily relies on credible sources of information, they have failed fact checks and promoted pseudoscience earning a Mixed factual reporting rating.
When meeting President Donald Trump in July 2018, Queen Elizabeth wore a brooch given to her by former president Barack Obama. - FALSE.
"More Than 4,000 Died Within Six Weeks - FALSE.
"The Senate is constitutionally required to review and vote on a president's nominees, regardless of party," - FALSE.
π STOP! Excluded from sources. web site formerly owned by Salem Media Group.
See: Salem Media Group subentry, this page.
See also main article: Regnery Publishing.
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to political bias, tabloid journalism
Wikipedia entry, 2021-12-12.
The Independent is a British online newspaper. It was established in 1986 as a national morning printed paper. Nicknamed the Indy, it began as a broadsheet and changed to tabloid format in 2003. The last printed edition was published on Saturday 26 March 2016, leaving only the online edition.
The Independent tends to take a pro-market stance on economic issues. The newspaper was controlled by Tony O'Reilly's Irish Independent News & Media from 1997 until it was sold to the Russian oligarch and former KGB Officer Alexander Lebedev in 2010. In 2017, a Saudi Arabian investor bought a 30% stake in it.
In June 2015, The Independent had an average daily circulation of just below 58,000, 85% down from its 1990 peak, while the Sunday edition had a circulation of just over 97,000. The daily edition was named National Newspaper of the Year at the 2004 British Press Awards. The website and mobile app have a combined monthly reach of 22,939,000.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com; overall we rate The Independent Left-Center Biased due to story selection that moderately favors the left. We also rate them Mixed in factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1986, by Newspaper Publishing, The Independent is a daily newspaper from London, United Kingdom. The Independent was launched by former The Daily Telegraph staffers Andreas Whittam Smith, Matthew Symonds, and Stephen Glover. In 1990, The Independent on Sunday was launched and edited by Stephen Glover. In 1994, the founders left the paper and Ian Hargreaves became the editor of the paper. A year later Newspaper Publishing was restructured, with Mirror Group [Reach plc, known as Trinity Mirror between 1999 and 2018] and Tony O'Reilly's Independent News & Media (INM) becoming joint owners of Newspaper Publishing.
In 1998, Independent News & Media took complete control of The Independent. Tony O'Reilly bought out the company for Β£30m and in 2010 and then Russian billionaire Alexander Lebedev and his son Evgeny Lebedev acquired The Independent. In 2016, The Independent moved to a digital-only format. Simon Kelner is currently the editor-in-chief of The Independent titles. Andreas Whittam Smith, The Independent's founder, has also joined the board of Independent Print Limited. In 2017, Saudi Businessman Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel bought a 30% stake in The Independent online newspaper.
The Independent is owned by Independent Print Limited, a company owned by the Lebedev family (Alexander Lebedev and his son Evgeny Lebedev). In 2017, Saudi Businessman Sultan Muhammad Abuljadayel bought a 30% stake in The Independent online newspaper. Advertising and subscription generate revenue for the paper.
The Independent recently joined up with a media group with close links to the Saudi royal family [House of Saud] to launch websites across the Middle East.
In review, The Independent tends to publish stories utilizing minimally loaded language in their headlines such as: "Theresa May insists Brexit deal is not dead despite EU leaders refusing to make further concessions," and "US news 'Mueller investigation: Special counsel attacks Flynn criticism of FBI interview'." The Independent also republishes news from other credible sources such as
According to a 2017 survey conducted by YouGov (U.K.), The Independent is viewed as having a center-left bias in reporting, with 79% saying it was either Center or Left and only 21% saying it leaned right. In general, The Independent a left-leaning editorial bias. Further, they produce a high content volume; therefore, the number of failed fact checks is low compared to the number of stories published. Consequently, they are classified as factually Mixed rather than questionable.
"Analysis 'Climate change might be worse than thought after scientists find major mistake in water temperature readings'" - LOW SCIENTIFIC CREDIBILITY
"New antibody tests are 100% accurate." - FALSE
"Sir David King, who chairs the Independent SAGE group of scientists, has claimed that 27,000 people will die by next April if current levels of COVID-19 infection continue." - FALSE
"915 children admitted with malnutrition Cambridge hospitals between 2015 and 2020. There were 656 similar admissions at Newcastle hospitals and 656 at the Royal Free London hospitals." - FALSE
"Online conspiracy theories and misinformation relating to COVID-19 have resulted in at least 800 deaths from coronavirus." - FALSE
"Donald Trump said, 'undocumented immigrants are not people; they are animals.'" - FALSE
π STOP! Excluded from sources. See also (this file):
While providing detailed reports with apparently factual financial data (spot fact-checked, e.g., against IRS Form 990 filings), content from Capital Research Center is strongly biased against left-wing ideology (politics and policies).
The Capital Research Center (CRC) was founded in 1984 by Willa Johnson, former senior vice president of The Heritage Foundation. Donors to the Capital Research Center have included foundations run by the
In 2017, the CRC launched the website "Influence Watch" [InfluenceWatch.org], which focuses on identifying funding sources of progressive organizations and initiatives. In Wikipedia, a search for "InfluenceWatch" redirects to the Capital Research Center.
In 2021-02, Business Insider Inc. was renamed Insider.
π STOP! Excluded from sources, including:
potentially questionable content;
Board of Directors member association with The Huffington Post;
media ownership by Axel Springer, which has minority stakeholder ownership of Group Nine Media, Inc. - thus associated with the Vox Media ecosystem via
failed climate change fact checks:
part ownership by billionaire Jeff Bezos;
majority ownership by KKR & Co. Inc. [co-founded by Republican Trump supporter Henry R. Kravis - see New York Magazine description];
...
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Business Insider Left-Center Biased based on story selection that leans left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a reasonable fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Launched in 2007, Business Insider is a business news site concentrating on finance, industry, and tech news. Its headquarters is located in New York City, USA. Business Insider was founded by former Wall Street analyst Henry Blodget and DoubleClick's co-founder Dwight Merriman and CEO Kevin Ryan. It is published by Insider, Inc. Business Insider's board of directors includes The Huffington Post co-founder Kenneth "Ken" Lerer, and the president and chief operating officer are Julie Hansen. Henry Blodget is also CEO and editor-in-chief of Business Insider.
In 2015, German publishing company Axel Springer - owner of Bild, Die Welt, and Fakt - acquired Business Insider for $442 million, which brought their share to approximately 97 percent. Bezos Expeditions, the personal investment company of Jeff Bezos, will hold further shares according to the purchase details. The website is funded through online advertising.
Harvard University: The Future of Media Project: Index of US Mainstream Media Ownership (2021-11-30).
[19] Business Insider. Top owner / investor: Axel Springer SE, majority owned by KKR & Co. Inc. (Henry R. Kravis, George R. Roberts, Jerome Kohlberg Jr. Private Equity). Axel Springer SE is a German digital publishing house which is the largest in Europe, with numerous multimedia news brands. KKR owns 45% and has a majority control. Ownership: Private For Profit. Reach: 100k subscribers (2020, WSJ), 107.32M on average monthly uniques (SimilarWeb 2021). Comscore reports monthly uniques for Feb. 2021 are 95,340,000. Estimated Monthly readers: 95,340,000.
Wikipedia entry, 2021-11-30.
Business Insider is an American financial and business news website founded in 2007. Since 2015, a majority stake in Business Insider's parent company Insider Inc. has been owned by the German publishing house Axel Springer SE. In 2021-02, Business Insider Inc. was renamed Insider.
Insider's current CEO is Henry Blodget, who was censured and permanently barred from the securities industry in 2003 following an investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, NASD [now: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority] and the New York Stock Exchange.
After Business Insider was purchased by Axel Springer SE in 2015, a substantial portion of its staff left the company. According to a
In 2010, Business Insider falsely reported that New York Governor David Paterson was slated to resign, which multiple news sources had also reported; Business Insider had earlier reported a false story alleging that Steve Jobs experienced a heart attack, which was based on the citizen-journalism site iReport. The story was updated 25 minutes after being published, after learning that it was false.
In April 2011, Henry Blodget sent out a notice inviting publicists to "contribute directly" to Business Insider. As of September, Business Insider allowed the use of anonymous sources "at any time for any reason". According to the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers, Business Insider gave SAP "limited editorial control" over the content of its "Future of Business" section as of 2013. The website publishes a mix of original reporting and aggregation of other outlets' content. Business Insider has also published native advertising [Aside: BuzzFeed's business model also relies primarily on native advertising.]
[Source for the preceding paragraphs: Wikipedia, 2021-11-30.]
Native advertising, also called sponsored content, is a type of advertising that matches the form and function of the platform upon which it appears. In many cases it functions like an advertorial, and manifests as a video, article or editorial. The word native refers to this coherence of the content with the other media that appear on the platform.
These ads reduce a consumers' ad recognition by blending the advertising into the native content of the platform, even if it is labeled as "sponsored" or "branded" content. Readers may have difficulty immediately identifying them as advertisements due to their ambiguous nature, especially when deceptive labels such as "From around the web" are used.
Product placement (embedded marketing) is a precursor to native advertising. The former places the product within the content, whereas in native marketing, which is legally permissible in the US to the extent that there is sufficient disclosure, the product and content are merged.
[Source for the preceding paragraph: Wikipedia, 2021-11-30.]
... Business Insider has faced criticism for what critics consider its clickbait-style headlines. A 2013 profile of Henry Blodget and Business Insider in The New Yorker suggested that Business Insider - because it republishes material from other outlets - may not always be accurate.
[Source for the preceding paragraph: Wikipedia, 2021-11-30.]
Amazon Doesn't Produce 20% of Earth's Oxygen - FALSE.
Excellent reporting, via the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) | main page.
In 1997, the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) launched the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). This international network, based in Washington, D.C., includes over 200 investigative reporters in over 90 countries and territories. Gerard Ryle is the director of ICIJ. Its website publishes The Global Muckraker. ICIJ is focused on issues such as "cross-border crime, corruption, and the accountability of power". In 2013, the consortium reported having 160 member journalists from 60 countries. The ICIJ brings together teams of international journalists for different investigations (over 80 for Offshore leaks). It organized the bi-annual Daniel Pearl Awards for Outstanding International Investigative Reporting. ICIJ staff members include Michael Hudson, while the Advisory Committee in 2013 included Bill Kovach, Phillip Knightley, Gwen Lister, and Goenawan Mohamad.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize, particularly sources due to concern over funding to the Poynter Institute from the notoriously neoliberal billionaire
In 2015, the Poynter Institute launched the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), which sets a code of ethics for fact-checking organizations. The IFCN reviews fact-checkers for compliance with its code, and issues a certification to publishers who pass the audit. The certification lasts for one year, and fact-checkers must be re-examined annually to retain their certifications.
The IFCN and the American Press Institute jointly publish Factually, a newsletter on fact-checking and journalism ethics.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Inter Press Service (IPS) high in factual reporting due to credible sourcing and Left-Center biased based on story selection that usually favors the left.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1964, Inter Press Service or IPS news agency is a global news agency based in Rome, Italy. Roberto Savio and Pablo Piacentini are the founders of Inter Press Service) and Thalif Deen is Senior Consulting Editor.
Inter Press Service (IPS) focuses on providing news and analysis of sustainable development, events on the Global South, civil society, and globalization.
According to their about page, Inter Press Service states its mission as "giving a voice to the voiceless - acting as a communication channel that privileges the voices and the concerns of the poorest and creates a climate of understanding, accountability, and participation around development, promoting a new international information order between the South and the North."
Wikipedia, 2021-10-05
In the Public Interest (ITPI) is a nonpartisan non-profit organization based in Oakland, California, that studies public education, infrastructure, social services, and other public goods. According to its website, ITPI "helps community organizations, advocacy groups, public officials, researchers, and the general public understand how the privatization of public goods impacts service quality, democracy, equity, and government budgets." The organization also "advocates for responsible contracting" and "reclaiming and building popular support for public institutions that work for all of us".
ITPI is a fiscal project of the Partnership for Working Families (PWF), a 501(c)(3) nonpartisan, non-profit organization based in Oakland, California.
History
ITPI was founded in 2009 by its current executive director, Donald Cohen. The organization is funded through grants from a variety of foundations and non-corporate organizations, as well as private donations from individuals.
In 2016, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, then a presidential candidate for the Democratic Party, renewed calls to ban private prisons after seeing a report from ITPI that estimated the top two private prison operators made $361 million in profits in 2015.
In 2018, Cohen advised Pittsburgh Bill Peduto on engaging in a potential public-private partnership for the city's municipal water system.
In 2020, author and activist Naomi Klein said, "ITPI is an essential organization that we all count on as we fight the assault on public goods and the commons."
Wikipedia, 2021-12-09:
In These Times is an American politically progressive monthly magazine of news and opinion published in Chicago,  Illinois. In These Times was established as a broadsheet-format fortnightly newspaper in 1976 by James Weinstein, a lifelong socialist.
In These Times investigates alleged corporate and government wrongdoing, covers international affairs, and has a cultural section. In These Timesn regularly reports on labor, economic and racial justice movements, environmental issues, feminism, grassroots democracy, minority communities, and the media.
As of 2017, In These Times had a circulation of over 50,000. As a nonprofit organization, the magazine is financed through subscriptions and donations.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate In These Times far-Left Biased based on editorial positions that align with Democratic Socialism. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to a significant imbalance in story selection, as well as the use of frequent emotional language which can be misleading.
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL.
Founded in 1976, In These Times is an American politically progressive monthly magazine of news and opinion published in Chicago, Illinois. According to In These Times's about page, they are "an independent, nonprofit magazine, is dedicated to advancing democracy and economic justice, informing movements for a more humane world, and providing an accessible forum for debate about the policies that shape our future."
In These Times is a nonprofit that is owned and published by the Institute for Public Affairs (U.S.). Revenue is derived through advertising and donations.
Disambiguation: not the Australian Institute for Public Affairs
This one: Institute For Public Affairs in Chicago, Illinois - EIN: 942889692 | Financials: see
In review, In These Times publishes news and opinion articles from a Democratic socialist perspective. There is the frequent use of emotionally loaded language that favors the left such as this: "To Save Species from Extinction, We Must Consider More than Just Numbers." Although biased in wording this story is properly sourced to scientific studies as well as The Conversation. Story selection always favors the progressive left and often denigrates the right and establishment Democrats such as this: "Joe Biden Lied His Face Off About the Iraq War."
Editorially, In These Times always favors the progressive left and denigrates corporations and those who support them. They often report favorably on Democratic socialist candidates such as Bernie Sanders as evidenced by this: "Want More Proof of Corporate Media's Anti-Bernie Bias? Look at MSNBC's Democratic Debate." In general, In These Times aligns with what would today be considered the far-left:
A factual search reveals In These Times has not failed a fact check.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize (due in part to ownership by Torstar).
iPolitics.ca: coverage of Canadian politics, policy and the business of government.
Wikipedia: iPolitics.ca is a Canadian digital newspaper, which covers stories in Canadian politics. The site was launched in 2010 by founding editor and publisher James Baxter, and offers daily coverage of political news, a quarterly print magazine, political analysis podcasts and specialized parliamentary monitoring services. Since October 2018, it has been owned by Torstar.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
iPolitics.ca covers Canadian politics and news. They have a very mild left of center bias and are factual in reporting from credible sources. (
Left-center bias. These media sources [iPolitics.ca] have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to funding by billionaire owner Pierre Omidyar, left-wing political bias, and numerous controversies. [Changed from no flag to red flag 2022-01-02.]
MediaBiasFactCheck: overall, we rate The Intercept progressive Left Biased based on story selection that routinely favors the left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High due to previous fabricated work and censorship of writers. "Mostly factual"
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Launched in 2014 by , The Intercept is a news organization covering national security, digital privacy, government secrets, politics, civil liberties, the environment, international affairs, technology, and more. The Intercept was founded by former
The editors are Betsy Reed and Jeremy Scahill. Glenn Greenwald is a former constitutional law and civil rights litigator known for obtaining and publishing Edward Snowden's leaks about NSA surveillance while working for
On 10/29/20, Glenn Greenwald resigned from The Intercept, citing censorship of his reporting on Joe Biden.
The Intercept is funded by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar's media company, , a non-profit media organization focused on entertainment studios, consumer businesses, and journalism. Omidyar initially committed $250 million and continues to support it through First Look Media. First Look Media's other brands include Topic, Field of Vision, and the Nib. The Intercept also receives reader donations.
[Glenn Greenwald, 2020-10-30] My Resignation From The Intercept. The same trends of repression, censorship and ideological homogeneity plaguing the national press generally have engulfed the media outlet I co-founded, culminating in censorship of my own articles. | Hacker News (2020-10-29)
[Wikipedia, captured 2021-05-09] Kaiser Family Foundation
KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation), also known as the The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, is an American non-profit organization, headquartered in San Francisco, California. It prefers KFF since its legal name can cause confusion as it is no longer a foundation or a family foundation, and is not associated with Kaiser Permanente [founded 1945 by Henry John Kaiser].
KFF focuses on major health care issues facing the nation, as well as U.S. role in global health policy. KFF states that it is a non-partisan source of facts and analysis, polling and journalism for policymakers, the media, the health care community, and the general public, and its website has been heralded for having the "most up-to-date and accurate information on health policy" and as a "must-read for healthcare devotees."
MediaBiasFactCheck: LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.
Overall, we rate Kaiser Family Foundation Least Biased based on pro-science reporting and High for factual reporting due to strong, credible sourcing.
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, or just Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), is headquartered in Menlo Park, California. The Kaiser Family Foundation focuses on major health care issues facing the nation and the U.S. role in global health policy. The Kaiser Family Foundation states that it is a non-partisan source of facts and analysis, polling, and journalism for policymakers, the media, the health care community, and the general public, and KFF.org is known for having the "most up-to-date and accurate information on health policy." Through Kaiser Health News, KFF's editorially independent news service dedicated to coverage of health care policy and politics, the Foundation provides coverage of health policy issues and developments at the federal and state levels in the health care marketplace and health care delivery system.
[MediaBiasFactCheck] Read our profile on the United States government and media.
The Kaiser Family Foundation is a non-profit organization whose President and CEO is Dr. Drew Altman. KFF is funded through donations and grants.
In review, the Kaiser Family Foundation uses minimally loaded words such as this: "An Early Look at State Data for Medicaid Work Requirements in Arkansas," and the Kaiser Family Foundation sources to credible science, .org, and .gov sites. Kaiser is a reliable source for healthcare information that is factual. According to
None to date.
Overall, we rate Kaiser Family Foundation Least Biased based on pro-science reporting and High for factual reporting due to strong, credible sourcing. (2/2/2017) Updated (
[KHN.org, 2021-05-06] Salesforce,
Jacobin is an American socialist
Jacobin began as an
In 2014,
Jacobin's popularity grew with the increasing attention on leftist ideas stimulated by Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign, with subscriptions tripling from 10,000 in the summer of 2015 to 32,000 as of the first issue of 2017, with 16,000 of the new subscribers being added in the two months after Donald Trump's election.
In late 2016, Jacobin's editorial team unionized, including a total of seven full- and part-time members. An associate editor and co-chair of the union explained that Jacobin had only recently had enough full-time members to warrant unionization.
In spring 2017, Jacobin launched a peer-reviewed journal, Catalyst: A Journal of Theory and Strategy, which is today edited by New York University professor Vivek Chibber and a small editorial board. As of 2020, Catalyst claims a subscriber base of 5,000.
In November 2018, Jacobin's first foreign-language edition, Jacobin Italia, was launched. Sunkara described Jacobin as "a classic franchise model", with the parent publication providing publishing and editorial advice and taking a small slice of revenue, but otherwise granting the Italian magazine autonomy. A Brazilian edition appeared in 2019, and a German version started publishing in 2020; the latter grew out of Ada, an independent online magazine established in 2018 which primarily published translations of Jacobin articles. The first issue of the German edition featured interviews with Kevin KΓΌhnert and Grace Blakeley.
In April 2020, Jacobin launched its YouTube channel featuring the Weekends program with Michael Brooks and Ana Kasparian. Brooks died suddenly in July 2020.
In May 2020, some time after Bernie Sanders suspended his 2020 presidential campaign, Sanders' former adviser and speechwriter David Sirota joined Jacobin as editor-at-large.
In 2020, Jacobin became an affiliated member of the Progressive International.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Jacobin Magazine, Left Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the Democratic Socialist Left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2011, Jacobin is a democratic socialist quarterly magazine based in New York offering American leftist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture. Bhaskar Sunkara is the founder and editor. You can find a complete list of staff on their about page.
Jacobin is owned by
In review, Jacobin is a well-written quarterly magazine and website that publishes news from a strongly left-leaning perspective. There is moderate to the strong use of loaded emotional language such as this: "Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez Pick a Fight With the Loan Sharks." This article, like most on Jacobin, is properly sourced to a variety of High factual sources. Although Jacobin harshly criticizes President Trump, they also frequently criticize centrist Democrats often described as corporate and establishment "Democrats: Trump's Sadism - and Democrats' Accomodationism." Again, this article may contain loaded language, but it is properly sourced to only High factual sources. Editorially, all stories favor the Democratic Socialist left.
Jacobin has received praise from notable figures such as Noam Chomsky, who states they are "a bright light in dark times." They have also faced criticism from libertarian free-market advocates, Reason Magazine.
None in the Last 5 years.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
... In June 2000, Tribune Co., owner of the Chicago Tribune, acquired Times Mirror Company, the parent company of the
In 2018, Biotech billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong acquired
The
Biotech billionaire Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong is the owner of
In review, the
Editorially, the
In a 2018 Interview, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong told
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate LA Weekly as strongly left biased based on story selection that routinely favors the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of transparency with ownership, not disclosing their political bias, and poor sourcing on some articles.
Factual Reporting: MIXED.
LA Weekly lacks transparency as they do not openly disclose ownership. The paper and website is owned by Semanal Media LLC, which is owned by "David Welch, a Los Angeles-based attorney with ties to the cannabis industry; philanthropist Kevin Xu, an investor with biotech firm Mebo International; attorney Steve Mehr; boutique hotelier Paul Makarechian; real estate developer Mike Mugel; and Southern California investor Andy Bequer." Revenue is derived through advertising.
None to date.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Law & Crime Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Law & Crime (formerly Law Newz) is founded and run by Dan Abrams, who is currently the Chief Legal Analyst for ABC News. According to their about page, "LawandCrime.com is the only site and OTT Network that covers live court video, high-profile criminal trials, crazy crime, celebrity justice, and smart legal analysis. The site's team of journalists and lawyers provide real-time news updates along with live courtroom coverage of the most fascinating trials and legal stories." The current editor-in-chief is Rachel Stockman.
Law & Crime is owned by the Abrams Media Network, which also owns the left-leaning Mediaite and The Mary Sue. In 2017, A+E Network invested in Law & Crime and will provide trial coverage for its video streams. The website generates revenue through advertising and subscription fees.
In review, the website features links to watch live streams of ongoing court cases as well as a link that directs you to all the places you can watch, such as Pluto TV. The Law & Crime website also publishes news about court cases with occasionally sensational wording, such as this: "'Hollywood Ripper' Michael Gargiulo Found Guilty of Horrific Murders." They also report news related to law such as this: "AOC Using Similar Argument to Trump to Insist She Can Block People on Twitter." This story, like most, is properly sourced to credible media outlets. Editorially, Law & Crime frequently report negatively on the Trump administration: Sorry, Trump: New York's 'Red Flag' Law Doesn't Let You Take Chris Cuomo's Guns. The clearly labeled opinion piece is properly sourced to Cornell Law. In general, the news is factual and minimally biased; however, editorially, there is moderate left-leaning bias.
None to date.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Logically.ai Least Biased based on low biased fact-checking and commentary. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of claims.
"We are a technology company combining advanced AI and machine learning with one of the world's largest dedicated fact-checking teams to provide everyone, from individual citizens to national governments, with the tools they need to identify and disarm damaging and misleading information being shared online.
Since we were founded in 2017, Logically.ai's mission has been to enhance civic discourse, protect democratic debate and process, and provide access to trustworthy information. This has led us to create a suite of products and services to reduce and eventually eliminate the harm caused by the spread of misinformation and targeted disinformation campaigns.
"Our unique combination of artificial and human intelligence means we provide the best of both worlds: cutting edge technology that can monitor, identify, and track content at scale; and highly trained, IFCN-accredited human fact checkers and investigators who can provide complex and nuanced research and analysis. This combination means we can flag harmful content before it becomes widespread and provide our users with effective countermeasures ranging from instant fact checks, flagging content to platforms or law enforcement, and detailed investigations into campaign origins."
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Based in the United Kingdom and launched in 2019, Logically.ai is a Fact-Checking service that uses artificial intelligence to rate news articles. Logically.ai also has a browser extension that will scan the article you are presently reading and give basic information about the credibility based on the wording and the source. According to their about page, "Logically.ai employs one of the world's largest dedicated fact-checking teams, working together with AI to provide rigorous, evidence-based fact checks."
The website is fully transparent, listing Lyric Jain as the CEO and Dr. Al Baker as the managing editor. Logically.ai is a certified fact-checker of the International Fact-Checking Network.
Logically Ltd., which is registered in London and has offices in India and the U.K., is the company's owner. Logically.ai discloses funding, "Logically.ai is funded by a combination of Lyric's personal investment in the company (using personal savings and money from family business Eliza Tinsley), by venture capital investment from the Northern Powerhouse Investment Fund, managed by Mercia Asset Management, and investment from XTX Ventures. Lyric Jain remains the only person with significant control of Logically.ai." The website does not make it clear how they monetize.
Logically.ai offers a browser extension, mobile apps and publishes fact checks on the website. The fact checks use a combination of their proprietary AI and human interface. Logically.ai performs fact-checks by scanning the internet for credible media sources who either supports or refutes the claim. For example, in this fact check: "Gun manufacturers are exempt from being sued in the U.S." the AI scanned and found three sources that confirm the claims are false,
The browser extension, on the other hand, is a different story. When you view a news story, you can click the extension icon to get information about the news story. The extension will estimate the source's credibility and reliability and the tone of the wording. It will provide links to related stories, a good indicator of validity if other sources are reporting the same. It also offers a search for fact checks on the claim. This is all good. However, we found that if it does not recognize a source, and it has words such as "killed" in it, it rates it as negative. The word killed in a news story is not necessarily negative. The context is important. Further, they also label lesser known sources as "Toxicity". We are unable to determine why.
WE DO NOT RECOMMEND THE EXTENSION, but their fact checks are reasonable.
Editorially, they produce commentary on conspiracy theories and misinformation such as this: "How the Hegelian Dialectic Became a Far-Right Conspiracy Theory." We found editorials written with minimal bias and proper sourcing. All in all, Logically.ai does what it says and delivers the information with low bias.
None to date. Logically.ai is an IFCN fact-checker.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
The Lowy Institute is an independent think tank founded in April 2003 by Sir Frank Lowy, AC [AC: Order of Australia] to conduct original, policy-relevant research about international political, strategic and economic issues from an Australian perspective. It is based in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
While the Lowy Institute has alternatively been described as "neoliberal," "centre-right"-leaning or "reactionary, officially, its research and analysis aim to be non-partisan, and its active program of conferences, seminars and other events are designed to inform and deepen the debate about international policy in Australia and to help shape the broader international discussion of these issues.
COMMENT (Persagen). Australia has been sparring with China over China's influence in that region of the globe. Hence, many of the articles from the Lowy Institute have a terse, anti-China sentiment.
See also: Lowy Institute: Criticism
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
MacLeans.ca | Wikipedia entry | Controversies
"
While
Mark Steyn wrote articles and maintained a blog for
In 2007, a complaint was filed with the Ontario Human Rights Commission related to an article "The Future Belongs to Islam," written by Mark Steyn, published in
Soon afterwards, the head of the Canadian Human Rights Commission issued a public letter to the Editor of
The
The federal Canadian Human Rights Commission dismissed the Canadian Islamic Congress' complaint against
[Wikipedia] Human rights complaints against
Human rights complaints against
The Ontario Human Rights Commission ruled that it did not have the jurisdiction to hear the complaint. The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal heard the complaint in June 2008 and issued a ruling on October 10, 2008 dismissing the complaint. The Canadian Human Rights Commission dismissed the federal complaint on June 26, 2008 without referring the matter to a tribunal.
...
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
Despite the links to
See also:
Wikipedia, 2021-10-05
According to Angwin, in 2018, the portal planned to collect and create public datasets through public records requests, automated data collection, crowdsourcing information, and creating tools.
In April 2019, Gardner fired Angwin as editor-in-chief. Larson was named as her replacement. In a letter to Craig Newmark,
On August 6, 2019,
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Metabunk a Pro-Science source based on providing evidence-based information to debunk pseudoscience and conspiracy theories.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles. See all Pro-Science sources.
The previous headquarters, One Herald Plaza, were located on a 14-acre (5.7 ha) plot in Biscayne Bay, Miami. This facility opened in March 1963. In 2011 the Genting Group, a
The
The
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1903, the
The
The
In review, the
None in the Last 5 years.
π STOP! Excluded from sources. MintPressNews.com | Wikipedia entry | MediaBiasFactCheck entry
These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources. | Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: USA | source
[Wikipedia] Frequent contributors include Eva Bartlett [who also contributes to the
Max Blumenthal established and writes for theGrayZone.com - which purports to be an independent investigative journalism site, but is tainted by Blumenthal and his associations (e.g.) with
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate MIT Technology Review Pro-Science based on the strong sourcing of information and promoting consensus in scientific matters.
Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1899, MIT Technology Review is a bi-monthly magazine published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Magazine focuses on technology and innovation, as does the website. The current editor-in-chief is Gideon Lichfield.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology owns MIT Technology Review. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.
In review, the magazine and website publish news on technology, technical innovation, and sustainable energy. Articles and headlines are free of emotional wording, such as: "This is the most precise 3D map of the Milky Way ever made." Although they rarely report on politics, they do not positively view former President Trump's scientific positions such as "The Gaping, Dangerous Hole in the Trump Administration." Finally, during the coronavirus of 2020, they have reported factual pro-science information. In general, all information is pro-science, and any bias is directed at those who reject the scientific consensus.
None to date.
Wikipedia:
The
Founded in 1778 by
[ ... snip ... ]
Today,
In recent years,
On 2013-04-30 Postmedia Network announced that it would be eliminating the role of publisher at each of its newspapers, including
On 2014-10-21
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Founded in 1778, the
The
According to the
In review, the
None in the Last 5 years.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content (note "Controversies" in Wikipedia entry); carefully scrutinize.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Launched in 1976 and based in
Currently, Steve Katz is the publisher. The
Although
In general, story selection moderately favors the left, although the progressive left tends to be criticized more often than the establishment left. When it comes to sourcing,
None to date.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1865,
Katrina vanden Heuve is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of
In review,
Typically,
Some 90 pounds of cocaine was found on a cargo ship owned by U.S. Senate Majority Leader and anti-drug politician Mitch McConnell. - FALSE.
Overall, we rate
"Our team of investigative journalists dives deep to tell stories about Canada's natural world you can't find anywhere else. We have just two rules: 1) Follow the facts. 2) Tell it like it is.
"We're tired of false dichotomies and business-as-usual perspectives. We're not shy about the fact we think Canada's greatest assets are our people, our lakes, our rivers, our forests. We tell stories Canada's big news outlets miss and hustle to help our readers make sense of complex (sometimes downright messy) issues. As a non-profit online magazine, our goal isn't to sell advertising or to please corporate bigwigs - it's to bring evidence-based news and analysis to the surface for all Canadians.
"The Narwhal is a pioneer of non-profit journalism in Canada and is supported by more than 3,700 monthly members. In March 2021, The Narwhal became Canada's first English-language registered journalism organization, which means all of our members and donors receive donation tax receipts. The Narwhal is also a member of the Institute for Nonprofit News, recognizing our adherence to strict standards of editorial independence and financial transparency. The Narwhal is a founding member of Press Forward, Canada's association for independent media, and a proud partner organization of Covering Climate Now, a collaborative global journalism project to bring more coverage to climate issues.
"The Narwhal's reporting is frequently cited in
"
"Narwhals have intrigued explorers and scientists for hundreds of years. Indeed, just a few years ago, scientists discovered the narwhal's tusk is actually highly sensitive like an antenna.
"Throughout the Middle Ages, the narwhal was hunted for its tusk - which was more coveted as a magical unicorn horn than as the elongated tooth of a marine mammal. Whalers made a fortune selling horns while the rest of the world was duped into buying teeth.
"The Narwhal is here to celebrate the truth, and to tell stories about the world around us - even if those stories sometimes dispel cherished myths. The Narwhal is here because there's no such thing as unicorns."
"The storytellers in any society hold tremendous power. At The Narwhal, we recognize that this power represents both a privilege and a responsibility and we aim to use this power for the public good.
"To that end, we must recognize the inequities in Canadian media and in Canadian society at large.
"The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada's final report recognized that Canada is a country built on cultural genocide. It stated "cultural genocide is the destruction of those structures and practices that allow the group to continue as a group. States that engage in cultural genocide set out to destroy the political and social institutions of the targeted group. Land is seized and populations are forcibly transferred and their movement is restricted. Languages are banned. Spiritual leaders are persecuted, spiritual practices are forbidden, and objects of spiritual value are confiscated and destroyed ... families are disrupted to prevent the transmission of cultural values and identity from one generation to the next. In its dealing with Aboriginal people, Canada did all these things."
"Canada's colonial practices have far-reaching implications for newsrooms in Canada, which have long played a role in legitimizing abuses of power and cultural genocide.
"The Narwhal recognizes that environmental journalism must be grounded in respect for Indigenous knowledge and Indigenous rights and must foreground Indigenous voices.
"The most recent Canadian study of diversity in journalism (from 2006) found that just 3.4 per cent of journalists in 37 newsrooms across the country were Indigenous or people of colour. As of 2016, these groups comprised more than 28 per cent of the Canadian population.
"The Narwhal is committed to building a team that includes Indigenous voices and reflects the communities we serve. We take active measures to provide equal opportunity to people of all races, ethnicities, religions, genders, sexual orientations, gender identifications and abilities. We are also committed to fostering a welcoming culture that encourages flexibility and inclusion so all team members can fully contribute.
"As a small organization, we recognize some staff will undoubtedly carry an unfair burden if they are the sole representative of a marginalized group on The Narwhal's team. We aim to avoid this where possible, but will also acknowledge when this does occur to mitigate the weight of these circumstances.
"A diverse team enhances the relevance and substance of our journalism and is essential in fulfilling our mission to foster a deeper understanding of some of the most contentious issues of our time.
"The Narwhal endorses the calls to action on media diversity by Canadian Journalists of Colour and the Canadian Association of Black Journalists."
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Nation of Change far-Left Biased based on editorial positions that always favor the progressive left. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to not always aligning with the consensus of science when it comes to GMOs.
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL.
Nation of Change is a news and activism organization founded in 2011 and based out of Albuquerque, New Mexico. Nation of Change provides a free daily newsletter with articles from progressive writers and initiates activist calls to action. According to their about page, the mission is to "help people create a more compassionate, responsible, and value-driven world, powered by communities that focus on positive solutions to social and economic problems. We strive to accomplish this mission through fearless journalism combined with boots-on-the-ground activism in order to create real-world, actionable strategies for change."
Nation of Change is a 501(c) nonprofit that is funded through donations.
In review, Nation of Change provides a daily newsletter written from a progressive liberal perspective. The website features news stories that always favor the left and often uses moderately loaded language in their headlines and articles such as this: "The Trump administration's latest attempt to undermine science - and how to stop it." This story is sourced properly to
Nation of Change frequently reports on the environment and takes a pro-science position regarding human-influenced climate change. However, reporting on GMOs is always negative and does not always align with the consensus of science.
Editorially, Nation of Change favors left-leaning causes such as combating climate change, feminism, anti-corporate fascism, and social justice. They frequently report negatively on conservatives such as this: "The 4 biggest conservative lies about inequality and positively for socialism, 'Socialism' made America great." In general, Nation of Change reports news factually from a far-left progressive perspective.
None to date.
See also:
Wikipedia:
Canada's
In their 2016
The centre piece of the
In October 2017, the
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the National Observer Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that favor the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 2015, the National Observer is a Canadian online website focused on news through the lens of energy, environment, and federal politics. The publication emphasizes quality investigations, federal politics, breaking news, opinion, and analysis. According to their about page the "National Observer publishes investigative reporting, in-depth analysis, solutions journalism, multi-media features, opinion, and daily news coverage."
The National Observer clearly discloses ownership on their about page: "National Observer is owned by Observer Media Group, and became a certified B corporation in April 2018. Observer Media Group qualified for B Corp status for its commitments to social and environmental sustainability, joining a global movement of people using business as a force for good." The website is funded through donations and subscription fees.
In review, the National Observer reports original news as well as curated stories from
A factual search reveals that the National Observer has not failed a fact check.
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to Postmedia Network's history of
See also;
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1998, the
The
According to the
In review, the None to date.Failed Fact Checks
Example: disinformation troll
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the New Statesman Left Biased based on story selection that favors the left and High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The New Statesman is a British political and cultural magazine published in London. Founded as a weekly review of politics and literature on 12 April 1913, it was connected with Sidney Webb and Beatrice Webb and other leading members of the socialist Fabian Society. The New Statesman has, according to its present self-description, holds a liberal, skeptical political position.
The New Statesman is owned by GlobalData Plc, a data analytics and media company established in 1999 and has been listed on the London Stock Exchange since 2000. It was previously called Progressive Digital Media and, before that, the TMN Group. Advertising and subscription fees generate revenue.
In review, The New Statesman reports news and opinions with a left-leaning bias in story selection and wording such as this: "It is getting harder and harder for Nancy Pelosi to resist calls to impeach Trump." Like most on the New Statesman, this story utilizes credible sources such as Roll Call and The Washington Post. For the most part, stories are opposed to Conservatives, whether it be the U.S. version of the New Statesman or the U.K. version such as this: "Rory Stewart has said what many Conservative moderates are thinking about Boris Johnson." When it comes to U.K. politics, the New Statesman does not support Brexit, and when it comes to U.S. politics, they do not support President Trump. In general, most stories favor the left and denigrate the right.
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to failed fact checks, political biases, associations with known disinformation sources (Michelle Malkin; Daily Mail; ...). National Review is owned by the National Review Institute, which has received funding from the notorious dark money groups / influencers
The
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Bias Rating: RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY << Comment: Given my comments (above) and Media Bias/Fact Check's own analyses (below), this credibility rating is mystifying. My recommendation: π-flagged, i.e. removed as as informational source.
The
William F. Buckley Jr. appeared in a series of televised debates with Gore Vidal during the 1968 Republican National Convention, and this resulted in him suing Vidal and Esquire Magazine due to Vidal calling Buckley "racist, anti-black, anti-semitic and a pro-crypto Nazi." Buckley eventually settled with Esquire receiving a $115,000 payment, and dropped his suit against Vidal.
The
The
The
In review, the
A factual search reveals that in this article, the
"Supreme Court has ruled 13 times that Obama exceeded his constitutional authority" - FALSE
"Woman Who Blamed Trump after Giving Her Husband Fish-Tank Cleaner Now Under Investigation for Murder" - FALSE (Corrected)
Wikipedia, 2021-12-09:
The News & Observer is an American regional daily newspaper that serves the greater Triangle area based in Raleigh, North Carolina. The The News & Observer is the largest in circulation in the state (second is the Charlotte Observer). The The News & Observer has been awarded three Pulitzer Prizes; the most recent of which was in 1996 for a series on the health and environmental impact of North Carolina's booming hog industry. The The News & Observer was one of the first in the world to launch an online version of the publication, Nando.net in 1994.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The News and Observer Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1865, The News & Observer is a regional daily newspaper that serves the greater Research Triangle area based In Raleigh, North Carolina. The News & Observer is the second largest newspaper in North Carolina after The Charlotte Observer [Wikipedia; The Charlotte Observer]. The News & Observer has also been awarded three Pulitzer Prizes. The current editor is Robyn Tomlin.
The News & Observer is owned by The McClatchy Company, which owns numerous papers across the United States, including The Fresno Bee and The Kansas City Star and the
In review, The News & Observer covers local news through journalists with minimal bias such as this: "3 men face charges in heroin bust as suspect escapes, causes wrecks in Chapel Hill". National and world news often comes from
Editorially, The News & Observer moderately favor the left through presidential endorsements that have always picked Democrats since at least 1980. Further, op-eds tend to favor the left as well such as this: "Trump's callous food aid cuts? NC is already there" - though there are
A factual search reveals The News & Observer have not failed a fact check.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The New Civil Rights Movement far-Left Biased based on the use of loaded emotional language and editorial positions that favor the progressive left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the use of poor sources as well as a few failed fact checks.
Factual Reporting: MIXED.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The current editor-in-chief is
In review,
Editorially,
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Rupert Murdoch owns the notorious (reprehensible) disinformation source, stridently pro-Trump Fox News network. Accordingly, any information spawned by that sprawling network (including the sources below) must be scrutinized with extreme care, as potential (probable) disinformation sources.
This is exemplary re: the Fox News disinformation universe.
[BoingBoing.net, 2020-03-18] WATCH: Fox News hosts say coronavirus is fake news, then change their tune.
What a damning indictment of Fox News from the Post video team here. pic.twitter.com/r8Fz8vo5KV
-- andrew kaczynski π€ (@KFILE) March 18, 2020
[Twitter.com, 2020-03-17] What a damning indictment of Fox News from the Post video team here.
[video] π€ @KFILE: What a damning indictment of Fox News from the Post video team here.
[Source]
In this video, assembled by The Washington Post's media team, Fox News hosts and their rhetoric is contrasted just a few days apart. Then, they were claiming coronavirus was either nothing to worry about or an outright hoax; now they are solemnly telling people to look out for themselves as the virus rages.
[washingtonpost.com, 2020-03-16] On Fox News, suddenly a very different tune about the coronavirus. For weeks, some of Fox News's most popular hosts downplayed the threat of the coronavirus, characterizing it as a conspiracy by media organizations and Democrats to undermine President Trump.
[BusinessInsider.com, 2020-10-11] James Murdoch, son of Fox News owner Rupert Murdoch, says he walked away from family media empire because it legitimizes disinformation and obscures facts.
See also Rupert Murdoch's Media Holdings, which disambiguates and clarifies Rupert Murdoch's media empire (past and present).
... The Wall Street Journal has won 37 Pulitzer Prizes (as of 2019). The editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal are typically conservative in their position. The Wall Street Journal editorial board has promoted views that differ from the scientific consensus on climate change [climate change denial], acid rain, and ozone depletion, as well as on the health harms of second-hand smoke, pesticides and asbestos. It is regarded as a "newspaper of record," particularly in terms of business and financial news. ...
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Pseudoscience, Propaganda, Fake News, Failed Fact Checks | Bias Rating: RIGHT | MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY.
Wikipedia:
The website has been described by
After the
In 2021,
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize (financial irregularities among former executives noted, as well as past association with
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Thomas J. C. Martyn founded Newsweek in 1933 as a weekly magazine headquartered in New York City. Today, Newsweek is a news magazine and website covering news and analysis, international issues, technology, business, culture, and politics. Newsweek was bought by the Washington Post Company [now: Graham Holdings Company] in 1961 and eventually sold to audio magnate Sidney Harman in 2010.
In 2013, Etienne Uzac and Johnathan Davis acquired Newsweek and IBT Media, re-branding themselves as Newsweek Media Group in 2017. Newsweek Media Group also owns the Latin Times and Medical Daily. Newsweek reported that Etienne Uzac, co-owner of Newsweek Media Group, and Marion Kim, the company's finance director, both stepped down due to a long-term financial fraud probe.
Newsweek is owned by Newsweek Publishing LLC, which is co-owned by Dev Pragad and Johnathan Davis. Newsweek is funded through a paid subscription and advertising model.
In review, Newsweek publishes national and world news with minimal bias in wording such as this ...
Did Poland's First Lady Refuse to Shake President Trump's Hand? - FALSE (Corrected)
Amazon Doesn't Produce 20% of Earth's Oxygen - FALSE (Corrected)
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The New Yorker Left Biased based on story selection and editorial position that favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The New Yorker magazine was founded in 1925 by Harold Ross and his wife, Jane Grant, and Raoul Fleischmann backed them. The magazine initially focused on social and cultural life in New York City; however, it later transformed into publishing short stories, cartoons, satire, poetry, essays, art reviews, fiction, and in-depth journalism. The New Yorker has had many famous contributors, including Dorothy Parker, Robert Benchley, Alexander Woollcott, James Thurber, Sidney J. "S.J." Perelman, Janet Flanner, Wolcott Gibbs, and St. Clair McKelway.
The New Yorker is divided into sections such as News, Culture, Books, BusinessTech, Humor, Cartoons, Magazine, and more. Currently, David Remnick is the Editor.
The New Yorker is published by CondΓ© Nast. and is a subsidiary of Advance Publications Inc.. Samuel Irving Newhouse Sr. acquired The New Yorker in 1985 for "$200 a share for the magazine's common stock, an investment of about $142 million." The Newhouse family owns Advance Publications, and currently, the third and fourth generations of the Newhouse family are involved in the management. The New Yorker, Vogue, Vanity Fair, Gentlemen's Quarterly (GQ), Architectural Digest, CondΓ© Nast Traveler, and
Advertising, subscriptions, and newsstand sales fund the magazine. The New Yorker also has an online store where cartoons, iconic magazine covers, and more can be purchased.
In review, The New Yorker uses strong emotionally loaded headlines such as "Don't Underestimate Elizabeth Warren and Her Populist Message," and "Is Fraud Part of the Trump Organization's Business Model?" The New Yorker also publishes satirical articles from satirist Andy Borowitz through his The Borowitz Report, such as "Trump Offers to Station Pence at Border with Binoculars in Lieu of Wall." The Borowitz Report always favors the left and mocks the right. Further, The New Yorker provides original, in-depth journalistic reporting such as this: "Four Women Accuse New York's Attorney General of Physical Abuse." The result of this investigation led to the Attorney General resigning just hours after The New Yorker published the story. In general, both wording and story selection tends to favor the left mostly.
When it comes to sourcing, they typically utilize credible sources such as
Editorially, The New Yorker usually endorses Democrats, such as Barack Obama in 2012 and Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidential Election.
A 2014 Pew Research Survey found that 77% of The New Yorker's audience is consistently or mostly liberal, 16% Mixed, and 6% consistently or mostly conservative. This indicates that a more liberal audience strongly prefers The New Yorker.
None in the Last 5 years.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize due to failed (albeit corrected) fact checks, ownership by
Wikipedia entry.
... In 1976, the Australian media baron Rupert Murdoch bought New York Magazine in a hostile takeover, forcing out Milton Glaser and journalist Clay Felker. A succession of editors followed, including Jerome Armstrong and John Berendt (1977-1979). ... Rupert Murdoch got out of the magazine business in 1991 by selling his holdings to K-III Communications [now: RentPath, Inc.], a partnership controlled by financier Henry R. Kravis.
In 1980, Murdoch hired Edward Kosner, who had worked at Newsweek. ... In 1993, budget pressure from K-III Communications frustrated Kosner, and he left for Esquire magazine. After several months' search, during which New York Magazine was run by managing editor Peter Herbst, K-III Communications hired Kurt Andersen, the co-creator of Spy - a humor monthly of the late 1980s and early 1990s.
Kurt Andersen quickly replaced several staff members, bringing in many emerging and established writers (including Jim Cramer, Walter Kirn, Michael Tomasky, and Jacob Weisberg) and editors (including Michael Hirschorn, Kim France, Dany Levy, and Maer Roshan), and generally making the magazine faster-paced, younger in outlook, and more knowing in tone.
In August 1996, Bill Reilly fired Kurt Andersen from his editorship, citing the publication's financial results. According to Andersen, he was fired for refusing to kill a story about a rivalry between investment bankers Felix Rohatyn and Steven Rattner that had upset Henry R. Kravis, a member of the firm's ownership group. His replacement was Caroline Miller, who came from Seventeen, another K-III Communications title.
Henry R. Kravis (born January 6, 1944) is an American businessman, investor, and philanthropist. He is the co-founder of KKR & Co. Inc. Kravis is a
[Source for the preceding paragraph: Wikipedia, 2021-11-30.]
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate New York Magazine Left Biased based on wording and story selection that mostly favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and correcting a known failed fact check.
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1968, New York Magazine is an American bi-weekly magazine featuring politics, New York City life, culture, finance, entertainment, fashion, and food. New York Magazine is based in New York City. The parent company, New York Media, features digital brands including Vulture (movies, TV, music), The Cut (style-and-culture), Grub Street (food and restaurants), The Strategist (shopping), and New York (news and politics). NYmag.com serves as a portal for these websites, with some having their own independent URLs.
Graphic Artists Milton Glaser and journalist Clay Felker founded New York Magazine, which Rupert Murdoch eventually acquired in 1976. In 2003, the Wall Street investment banker Bruce Wasserstein acquired New York Magazine for $55 million and brought Adam Moss in as its editor. New York Magazine has earned many National Magazine Awards under his leadership. In 2009, after Bruce Wasserstein's death, his daughter Pamela Wasserstein became the company's chief executive officer and ran it through a family trust. In January 2019, Pam Wasserstein announced that David Haskell would succeed Adam Mossas editor-in-chief of the company; also, New York Media has named Avi Zimak as its new chief revenue officer and publisher. Avi Zimak takes over for Larry Burstein.
[NYTimes.com, 2019-09-24] Vox Media Acquires New York Magazine, Chronicler of the Highbrow and Lowbrow.
New York Magazine is owned by
In review, New York Magazine publishes articles with emotionally loaded headlines such as "
Editorially, New York Magazine does not publish many political op-eds; however, when they do, they almost always favor the left, such as this: "Limbaugh Pretty Sure That The Late Show's New Hire Means Civil War." Further, New York Magazine does not endorse political candidates.
A factual search reveals that New York Magazine has failed two fact checks by an IFCN Fact Checker. However, they corrected both articles, which complies with High factual standards.
π STOP! Excluded from sources - due to associations with Rupert Murdoch [Fox News, etc.] and disreputable content (fake news).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks.
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
... In 1976, Rupert Murdoch, the owner of News Corp, acquired the New York Post, and in 1988, Murdoch sold the paper to Real estate developer Peter S. Kalikow. When Kalikow lost the paper to bankruptcy in 1993, Rupert Murdoch again purchased the paper and continues to own it today. Since Murdoch took over the paper, The New York Post has been known for its over-the-top sensational headlines.
The New York Post is currently owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, which owns many conservative/sensational media outlets around the world. The paper is funded through advertising, subscriptions, and newsstand sales.
In review, the New York Post tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wording such as "Cop cold-cocks unarmed man 'acting irate' at restaurant," and "It's time for Bill Clinton to take a walk in the Chappaqua woods." The New York Post also republishes news from other sources, such as the least biased
Editorially, The New York Post has endorsed the
According to an
Mostly FALSE: Ted Cruz 'same senator who once supported a ban on sex toys' - Mostly False
Newly Discovered Planet Could Destroy Earth Any Day Now - FALSE
Hillary Clinton Regularly Had Her Maid Print Classified Documents - UNPROVEN
PS 169 Pledge of Allegiance and Holiday Ban Controversy - Mostly FALSE
'New York Post' op-ed rebuts starving children claim that was never made - PANTS ON FIRE [liar]
Hours after signing an executive order on Jan. 20, 2021, U.S. President Joe Biden violated his own mask mandate. - FALSE
Migrant children being sheltered in Long Beach, California, were each given a copy of Vice President Kamala Harris' children's book by the Biden administration. - FALSE
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
While widely respected, I have placed a caution / yellow flag β οΈ
The U.S. Navy UAP videos - leaked in 2017 to disinformationists To the Stars... Academy of Arts & Sciences (TTSA) and Luis Elizondo (and officially released by the United States Navy in 2020-04) - were introduced in the New York Times article. That article and those videos have been endlessly discussed and hyped in mainstream media - mostly in the context that UAP such as these represent a threat (implied to be from advanced, extraterrestrial civilizations). That "threat analysis" justifies additional defense expenditures - note, e.g., the subsequent creation of the United States Space Force, ...
The objects in the low-quality, granular U.S. Navy videos reported in the New York Times article, have been thoroughly debunked (e.g., as forward-looking infrared imaging artefacts that would be clearly understood by military analysts), most notably on the MetaBunk.org [Wikipedia] website
The credibility of the aforementioned New York Times article authors (Helene Cooper; Ralph Blumenthal; Leslie Kean) viz-a-viz the UAP phenomenon - strains one's credulity, based on their statements and other information presented in Showtime Networks Inc.'s 2021-08 television series UFO (2021-08) [review]. That series disclosed, for example, Leslie Kean's longtime involvement on the fringes of the UFO community, the shilling of the
With additional first-person discussion of the UAP phenomenon by
This particular issue serves as an exemplar by which journalists and new organizations - regardless of whom they are - need to be constantly scrutinized and assessed for bias, misinformation and disinformation.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Funded by / Ownership.
Mark Thompson became president and chief executive officer of
According to
Overall, we rate the
[CBC.ca, 2022-01-06] The New York Times to purchase sports news site The Athletic for $US550M. Deal expected to close in 1st quarter of 2022; sports outlet to operate seperately.
After being privately held until 1973, The Boston Globe was sold to
In 2005-02,
There is a bit of irony that an
After the sale of The Athletic to
Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting has been critical of the U.S. media's coverage of Steven Donziger's trial and house arrest. In July 2021, FAIR wrote that
[Salon.com, 2020-10-23] New York Times nailed for publishing Republican propaganda - yet again. Two supposedly "average" voters in a Times story turn out to be hardcore
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
New Tang Dynasty Television (NTD). New Tang Dynasty Television (NTD, Chinese: ζ°εδΊΊι»θ¦θΊ) is a multilingual American television broadcaster, founded by Falun Gong practitioners, based in New York City. The station [NTD] was founded in 2001 as a Chinese-language broadcaster, but has since expanded its language offerings. NTD retains a focus on mainland China in its news broadcasts.
MediaBiasFactCheck: "Overall, we rate NTD TV Right-Center biased based on editorial positions that favor the right. We also rate NTD TV Mixed for factual reporting due to a lack of transparency with ownership and a failed fact check."
... The Epoch Times is a far-right international multi-language newspaper and media company affiliated with the Falun Gong new religious movement. The newspaper, based in New York City, is part of the Epoch Media Group, which also operates New Tang Dynasty (NTD) Television. The Epoch Times has websites in 35 countries but is blocked in mainland China. ...
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
NNDB | Wikipedia [owner, Soylent Communications, redirects here]
NNDB is an intelligence aggregator that tracks the activities of people we have determined to be noteworthy, both living and dead. Superficially, it seems much like a "Who's Who" where a noted person's curriculum vitae is available (the usual information such as date of birth, a biography, and other essential facts.)
NNDB mostly exists to document the connections between people, many of which are not always obvious. A person's otherwise inexplicable behavior is often understood by examining the crowd that person has been associating with.
The Adobe Flash-based "NNDB Mapper " [mapper.nndb.com (dead link, 2020-09-01)] is a visual tool for exploring the connections between people in NNDB, linking them together through family relations, corporate boards, movies and TV, political alliances, and shadowy conspiracy groups. Maps can be saved and shared for others to explore.
Most recent Internet Archive snapshot [2017-08-23].
π STOP! Excluded from sources. Potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
See main article:
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Factual Reporting: MIXED
According to their About page "
A factual search reveals that
Wikipedia entry.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1970,
The first program broadcast on
According to a
In 2000, the conservative pro-Israel
According to a
In review,
None to date.
See also;
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Factual Reporting: MIXED.
Founded in 1791,
In review,
See
π STOP! Excluded from sources. One America News Network is a notorious far-right cable channel prominent for promoting falsehoods and conspiracy theories.
Disambiguation: not to be confused with Centre for Economic Policy Research (British registered charity).
The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) is an economic policy think-tank based in Washington, D.C., that was co-founded in 1999 by economists Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot. CEPR contributors include Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences recipients Joseph Stiglitz and Robert Solow. Politically, it has been described as both progressive and left-leaning [center-left politics].
Project: Revolving Door Project
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) Left-Center biased based on political policy that favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; funding controversies; ... - carefully scrutinize.
Wikipedia entry.
The
The
Note also
See also, re: donor-advised funds: DonorsTrust | Fidelity Charitable | Philanthropy Roundtable | Tides Foundation | ...
[ ... snip ... ]
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: o verall, we rate the
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1993 by John Stauber, the
The
In review, the
None to date.
See also: International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ; entry below). In 1997, the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) launched the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (main page). This international network, based in Washington, D.C., includes over 200 investigative reporters in over 90 countries and territories.
Wikipedia entry, 2021-12-17.
The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) is an American nonprofit investigative journalism organization whose stated mission is "to reveal abuses of power, corruption and dereliction of duty by powerful public and private institutions in order to cause them to operate with honesty, integrity, accountability and to put the public interest first." With over 50 staff members, the CPI is one of the largest nonprofit investigative centers in America. It won the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting.
The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) has been described as an independent,
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) Left-Center Biased based on story selection and advocacy that favors mostly liberal positions. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1989, the Center for Public Integrity (CPI) is one of the country's oldest and largest
The Center for Public Integrity is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that is funded through donations and grants from foundations such as the Carnegie Corporation, Leonardo Di Caprio Foundation [redirects to / now: Re:Wild (ReWild.org), and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. CPI discloses their largest donors here.
In review, the Center for Public Integrity publishes in-depth
Editorially, the CPI favors liberal policies and denigrates the conservative agenda. For example, the left-leaning Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting has described CPI as "progressive" - as has the
A factual search reveals the Center for Public Integrity has not failed a fact check.
Superb!
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1983, The
In review,
A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check. In fact,
The
"
The
Examples:
See also: Dark Money: Investigative Resources
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1845, the
The
According to the
In review, the
Editorially, there are more negative articles regarding liberal Prime Minister
A factual search reveals the
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to ownership by the Penske Media Corporation- noting particularly this report:
[HillReporter.com, 2021-04-01] The Demise of Rolling Stone: How A Legendary Magazine Sold Out to Trump and the Saudis
Notable properties: Deadline Hollywood | Fairchild Fashion Media | HollywoodLife.com | Robb Report | Rolling Stone | Sportico | Variety
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize, particularly sources due to concern over funding to the Poynter Institute from the notoriously neoliberal billionaire
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Politifact Left-Center Biased based on fact checks that tend to be more favorable for the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting and a credible fact-checker that is not without bias.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2007 by the Tampa Bay Times, Politifact.com utilizes reporters and editors from the Times and affiliated media outlets to "fact-check statements by members of Congress, the White House, lobbyists, and interest groups." They publish original statements and their evaluations on the Politifact.com website and assign each a "Truth-O-Meter" rating. The ratings range from "True" for completely accurate statements to "Pants on Fire" (from the taunt "Liar, liar, pants on fire") for false and ridiculous claims. In 2018, Politifact became affiliated with the IFCN.
According to their "Who Pays For PolitiFact?" page [local copy, 2021-02]:
(Last updated: February 2021)
PolitiFact is a nonpartisan fact-checking website to sort out the truth in American politics. PolitiFact was created by the Tampa Bay Times, a Florida newspaper, in 2007. In 2018, PolitiFact was acquired by the Poynter Institute, a nonprofit school for journalists.
You can view The Poynter Institute's most-recent public financial disclosure (IRS Form 990) here.
While PolitiFact relies on administrative support from the Poynter Institute, it is otherwise financially self-sustaining. It receives funding from online advertisements placed on the website. PolitiFact also receives compensation for selling its content to media publishers and companies. Organizations that contributed more than 5 percent of total PolitiFact revenues in the previous calendar year will be listed here:
/mnt/Vancouver/domains/persagen/04/docs/facebook.html
TikTok
PolitiFact also accepts grants, which are listed by calendar year below.
In 2017, PolitiFact launched a membership campaign called the Truth Squad to allow individual donations.
Accepting financial support does not mean PolitiFact endorses the products, services or opinions of its donors. Donors have no say in the ratings PolitiFact issues. PolitiFact does not give donors the right to review or edit content.
As part of PolitiFact's mission to remain transparent and independent, PolitiFact will disclose on this page any individual donation in excess of $1,000. PolitiFact does not accept donations from anonymous sources, political parties, elected officials or candidates seeking public office, or any other source with a conflict of interest as determined by PolitiFact's executive director.
See PolitiFact's 2020 annual report.
Individual donations to the Truth Squad: $585,069
Truth Squad members: 4,207
Truth Squad donations in excess of $1,000: 8
Bessie Rattner Foundation: $5,000
Community Foundation of New Jersey: $5,000
The Stelter Foundation: $2,000
Grounds for Promotion LLC: $1,150
Pryor, Jack: $2,500
Arens, Edward: $2,000
Beason, William: $1,500
Koenig, Ethan: $1,500
Democracy Fund: $75,000 (for general operating support)
Craig Newmark Philanthropies: $100,000 (misinformation coverage around COVID-19)
Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust: $73,000 (fact-checking of the 2020 elections)
Google: $50,000 (fact-checking of coronavirus misinformation)
International Fact Checking Network: $39,319 (video fact-checking on coronavirus)
[ ... snip ... ]
In review, Politifact has been called left-biased by some
Politifact uses minimally loaded language in their articles and headlines such as this: "Trump falsely claims NATO countries owe United States money for defense spending." They source information from credible media and/or direct statements from experts in the field or the politicians themselves. Despite Democrats currently controlling all branches of government, fact-checks continue to favor the left.
Editorially, Politifact does not directly produce op-eds; however, many fact-checks attempt to rationalize statements rather than stating directly if the statement was said and if it is true. For example, they fact-checked this statement by Republican Ted Cruz: "You didn't see Republicans when we had control of the Senate try to rig the game. You didn't see us try to pack the court." Politifact rated this claim false, and on many levels, it is false.
The
In reviewing Politifact for over 10 years now and using them as a primary fact-checking source for this website, we have seen this trend of rating Republicans more harshly on numerous occasions. This update moves Politifact to Left-Center Biased based on this reasoning.
None to date. They are an IFCN certified fact-checker.
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to
Comment re:
Additional concern: media ownership by
See also:
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2007 by two former
On 8/26/2021 German publisher,
Both sides of the political spectrum have accused
... In review,
Editorially,
None to date.
Wikipedia entry, 2021-10-27.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 2018 by
In review, the website and newsletter publish news and opinion content with a left-leaning bias in story selection. Headlines sometimes contain moderately loaded language such as this: "The cover-up of the cover-up." Most articles are strongly sourced from credible outlets and information such as this: "An interview with the Ukrainians who created the 'I Love America' Facebook page." Editorially,
None to date.
Overall, we rate
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to
EXCLUDED π POSTMEDIA NETWORK PUBLICATIONS:
This is a partial list. For a more complete listing, see the
Wikipedia, 2020-09-18:
The company's strategy has seen its publications invest greater resources in
On 2010-07-13, the
On 2014-10-06 Postmedia's CEO
In 2016, the company sought to restructure its
On 2017-11-27
In 2018-03, the
On 2018-06-26, the
On 2018-11-27
On 2019-06,
In 2019-11,
[ ... snip ... ]
[CBC.ca, 2022-02-18] Telegraph-Journal, other Irving-owned N.B. newspapers to be sold to Postmedia.
On 2022-02-17
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize, particularly sources due to concern over funding from the notoriously neoliberal billionaire
See also:
International Fact-Checking Network [Poynter Institute]
PolitiFact [Poynter Institute]
Tampa Bay Times [Poynter Institute]
The Poynter Institute for Media Studies is a non-profit journalism school and research organization located in St. Petersburg, Florida. The school is the owner of the Tampa Bay Times newspaper and the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Poynter Institute Least Biased based on low emotional reporting and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The Poynter Institute for Media Studies [Poynter] is a non-profit school for journalism located in St. Petersburg, Florida. The school is the owner of the Tampa Bay Times newspaper. The school began on May 29, 1975, and offers courses for journalists and students. The website was launched in 1999.
In 2015, the institute launched the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) dedicated to bringing together fact-checkers worldwide to support the growing number of initiatives by promoting best practices and exchanges in the field. The current President is Neil Brown.
The website is owned by the non-profit Poynter Institute for Media Studies. They are funded through tuition and donations. The website discloses donors who give over $50,000, including a diversified list such as the
Source for the following section: Poynter.org/major-funders/, 2021-09 | local copy, 2021-10-20
Last Updated: Sept. 2021
The Poynter Institute is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit global leader in journalism, serving democracy through the teaching, practice, promotion and advocacy of ethical, independent reporting for all. We are the home of the Craig Newmark Center for Ethics and Leadership, as well as three fact-checking enterprises - the International Fact-Checking Network, the Pulitzer Prize-winning PolitiFact, and MediaWise [Poynter Institute; Poynter Institute description, Wikipedia].
We rely on support from several funding sources who value the essential role of the free press in our society, including corporate partners, philanthropic foundations, government agencies and individual donors. We prize our reputation for teaching and journalistic excellence, developed over more than four decades. To protect that reputation, we retain complete independent control over our editorial content, and teaching programs. Regardless of the funding model, Poynter's faculty and staff have final authority over our work, as outlined in our Ethics Policy.
While all gifts, no matter the size, help us fulfill our mission, we consider contributions of $50,000 or more as significant funding sources that should be revealed to the public. Sources are organized by area of support and listed alphabetically.
Gifts help advance and preserve journalism's role in democracy by supporting relevant programs that set the standards for the industry's future. Together, we are improving the quality of journalism by investing in our programs that strengthen and sustain local news, elevate diverse voices in newsrooms and connect journalists and the citizens they serve.
Craig Newmark Philanthropies. Elevating discourse and fact-based expression while battling disinformation and bias at The Craig Newmark Center for Ethics and Leadership
Gannett Foundation. Transforming the careers of hundreds of women in news media and tech through the Poynter Leadership Academy for Women in Media.
Gill Foundation. Providing unrestricted support to make good journalism better.
Institute for War and Peace Reporting. Expanding fact-checking training worldwide with the International Fact-Checking Network, serving more than 20 countries including Tunisia, Chile, Sri Lanka, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Fiji, Pakistan and Myanmar.
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Providing local newsrooms with transformational change consulting.
Lumina Foundation. Helping journalists tell more impactful stories through topical training.
John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Teaching journalists how to improve jails and policing coverage.
Newton & Rochelle Becker Charitable Trust. Supporting journalistic excellence in a democratic society.
Rays Baseball Foundation. Providing sponsorship support at our annual gala for innovative programs that strengthen reporting.
Robert R. McCormick Foundation. Improving diversity and inclusion in news organizations to better serve audiences nationwide.
TEGNA Foundation. Providing access and resources to our high school journalism programs.
The Washington Post. Training journalists of color working in digital media to thrive, professionally and personally, through the Leadership Academy for Diversity in Media.
[ ... snip ... ]
[ ... snip ... ]
In review, the Poynter website features news related to the press and news industry. Headlines utilize mild to moderate loaded emotional language such as this: "Across the world, politicians promote conspiracy theories to get ahead." This story is properly sourced to scientific studies as well as the Least Biased
A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check. However, in May of 2019, Poynter published an article called UnNews, which listed 515 media sources deemed unreliable. This article was met with criticism due to the list containing some biased but credible sources. Within two days, Poynter retracted the article and issued an apology. Media Bias Fact Check covered this story, which you can read here.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
The Post Millennial publishes national and local news and has a large amount of opinion content. The Post Millennial has been criticized for releasing misinformation and articles written by fake personas, for past employment of an editor with ties to white supremacist-platforming and pro-Kremlin media outlets, and for opaque funding and political connections.
DESPITE the conclusions from MediaBiasFactCheck.com, given the highly disconcerting Wikipedia entry and other media (web) reports, it is concluded that "The Post Millennial" is an internet trolling, disinformation site.
[FreshDaily.ca, 2020-09-08] Here's what you need to know about the "Hugs Over Masks" groups in Canada. | local copy (html, captured 2020-10-19)
Who are Hugs Over Masks associated with?
Hugs Over Masks is affiliated with one of the country's largest anti-vaccine organizations, Vaccine Choice Canada. A look at the anti-vaccine group's social media shows their opposition to a COVID-19 vaccine as well as masks and social distancing.
Lawyer John Carpay, President of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. John Carpay is the author of this tripe, on the disinformation "news" source The Post Millennial.
[thePostMillennial.com, 2020-07-25] Making face masks mandatory is not backed by science or law - reposted here [local copy (html, captured 2020-10-19)] on the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms website.
Vladislav Sobolev told
Wikipedia, 2022-02-07:
In 2013, the
In a 2017
During the
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Press Progress Left Biased based on story selection and wording that consistently favors the left and High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Founded in 2013, Press Progress is an online news and analysis website, which is a project of the Broadbent Institute that seeks to provide an online Progressive Political news source. According to their about page "Our work focuses on investigative reporting, fact-checking and keeping tabs on issues that don't get enough attention. We aim to break original stories that Canada's big news outlets miss and advance stories on issues that matter to our progressive readership."
Press Progress is owned by the Broadbent Institute, which a Canadian progressive and social democratic think tank. It was founded by Ed Broadbent in 2011. Press Progress is funded through donations.
In review, Press Progress reports news and opinions that are favorable to the left. There is the frequent use of loaded language that favors the left such as this: "10 Cruel and Unusual Ways Doug Ford Has Made Life Worse 'For the People' of Ontario Since Last Year's Election." This story is appropriately sourced to credible outlets such as the
A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check.
We're producing original, progressive journalism that holds Canada's rich and powerful accountable.
Our new coverage prioritizes under-covered topics that matter to our progressive readership and serve the public interest, including social and economic equality, environmental sustainability, democracy as well as a critical focus on fiscal and social conservative actors and ideas.
Our head office is located in Ottawa, with reporters on the ground based in Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia and the Prairies.
All news content published by
Note; full-time editorial and reporting positions for
In 2013, the Broadbent Institute launched
However,
Founded in 2013, Press Progress is an online news and analysis website, which is a project of the Broadbent Institute that seeks to provide an online Progressive Political news source. According to their about page "Our work focuses on investigative reporting, fact-checking and keeping tabs on issues that don't get enough attention. We aim to break original stories that Canada's big news outlets miss and advance stories on issues that matter to our progressive readership."
[MediaBiasFactCheck] Read our profile on Canada's media and government.
Press Progress is owned by the Broadbent Institute, which a Canadian progressive and social democratic think tank. It was founded by Ed Broadbent in 2011. Press Progress is funded through donations.
In review, Press Progress reports news and opinions that are favorable to the left. There is the frequent use of loaded language that favors the left such as this: "10 Cruel and Unusual Ways Doug Ford Has Made Life Worse 'For the People' of Ontario Since Last Year's Election." This story is appropriately sourced to credible outlets such as the
A factual search reveals they have not failed a fact check.
Overall, we rate Press Progress Left Biased based on story selection and wording that consistently favors the left and High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record. [2017-02-18 | updated 2019-07-06]
[PressProgress.ca, 2022-07-14] PressProgress Joins Canada's National NewsMedia Council. 'This is another step that proves PressProgress takes its commitment to accuracy and responsible journalistic practices seriously'.
Wikipedia, 2022-01-05:
PR Newswire was a distributor of press releases headquartered in New York City. The service was created in 1954 to allow companies to electronically send press releases to news organizations, at first using teleprinters. The founder, Herbert Muschel, operated the service from his house in Manhattan for approximately 15 years. The business was eventually sold to Western Union, and then United Newspapers of London. In 2015-12 Cision Inc. announced it would acquire the company. On 2021-01-01,
MediaBiasFactCheck.com, 2022-01-05: overall, we rate PR Newswire Least Biased based on publishing press releases from various outfits. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
PR Newswire is a
Platinum Equity, LLC owns PR Newswire after purchasing Cision Ltd. (though
In review, primarily, PR Newswire collects press releases from companies and organizations and then republishes them without alteration. Although they publish press releases from left-biased and right-biased organizations, they do not select or favor releases. Besides publishing press releases, PR Newswire publishes content geared toward helping companies market their brands. In general, PR Newswire remains neutral and publishes press releases without bias. While the press releases may be questionable, PR Newswire is a credible source for press releases without alteration.
None in the Last 5 years.
See also:
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
...
Herbert Sandler is the Founding Chairman of
As a philanthropist, Herbert Sandler has donated approximately $1.5 billion in support of organizations involved in medical research, civil liberties groups such as the ACLU, and scientific research, especially for diseases that affect low-income people, the environment, and human rights. According to a Vanity Fair article and The Washington Post, Herbert Sandler is an influential Clinton donor.
[ ... snip ... ]
wk. Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James Edward O'Keefe III in 2010. The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups. Project Veritas also uses entrapment to generate bad publicity for its targets, and has propagated disinformation and conspiracy theories in its videos and operations. [ ... snip ... ] As a non-governmental organization, Project Veritas is financed by conservative fund DonorsTrust (which provided over $6.6 million from 2011 to 2019) and other supporters including the Donald J. Trump Foundation. In 2020, MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Project Veritas Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of misleading videos and several failed fact checks. Bias Rating: RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY. Founded in 2010, Project Veritas was created by James Edward O'Keefe III, an American conservative political activist. He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, some selectively edited to imply its subjects said things they did not, with figures and workers in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or allegedly illegal behavior by employees and/or representatives of those organizations. Project Veritas primarily targets liberals and liberal organizations. In April 2021, Project Veritas was permanently suspended by Twitter for violating its "platform manipulation and spam policy," suggesting he was operating multiple accounts in an unsanctioned way. O'Keefe has already announced that he will sue the company for defamation as he claims to have only one account. Founded in 2010, Project Veritas was created by James Edward O'Keefe III, an American conservative political activist. He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, some selectively edited to imply its subjects said things they did not, with figures and workers in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or allegedly illegal behavior by employees and/or representatives of those organizations. Project Veritas primarily targets liberals and liberal organizations. In April 2021, Project Veritas was permanently suspended by Twitter for violating its "platform manipulation and spam policy," suggesting he was operating multiple accounts in an unsanctioned way. O'Keefe has already announced that he will sue the company for defamation as he claims to have only one account. James O'Keefe owns project Veritas. Funding primarily comes from donations. However, most of these donations come from the DonorsTrust. The purpose of the Donor's Trust Fund is to "safeguard the intent of libertarian and conservative donors." In other words, it allows the source to receive funds without disclosing who they come from ["dark money"]. Needless to say, most funding for Project Veritas comes from conservative and libertarian organizations. [ ... snip ... ] MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Quanta Magazine a low-biased Pro-Science source that is Very High in factual reporting. Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. Founded in 2012, Quanta Magazine is a hard science news site founded by the Simons Foundation and focused on recent advances in physics, mathematics, biology, and computer science. As their About page states, "Illuminating basic science and math research through public service journalism." The Simons Foundation owns and publishes Quanta Magazine. Advertising and an online store generate revenue. Quanta Magazine takes complex subjects and presents them so that laypeople can understand without simplifying the subject matter or sacrificing the basic content. The articles on Quanta Magazine are well written, factual, well-sourced, and authored by experts in their respective fields. Headlines are presented with minimal bias and explain the content of the articles, such as this: "Turing Patterns Turn Up in a Tiny Crystal." Editorially, they rarely publish anything political and stick to science. None to date. π STOP! Excluded from sources. Homophobia; transphobia; anti-theism; misogyny; pseudo-science (climate change denial); racism; ... See also main article: Quillette is favored by several homophobic British Columbia Liberal Party members, as well as neoliberal luddites in Alberta, including Alberta Premier Jason Kenney's United Conservative Party; e.g.: [2019-12-05] Why Racists (and Liberals!) Keep Writing for 'Quillette'. The online magazine of the "intellectual dark web" is repackaging discredited race science [2020-07-06] Jason Kenney's Energy War Room is Spending Tax Dollars on Ads Casting Doubt on Climate Science.sp Canadian Energy Centre spent tax dollars on Facebook ads promoting an article published by the right-wing website Quillette Transphobe Jonathan Kay, the Canadian editor for Quillette, was formerly a blogger for the [NationalPost.com, 2019-12-02] Speaking of gender: A Transphobic trolls π STOP! Excluded from sources due to tabloid journalism, and other concerns (below). See also: AlterNet Salon republishes some content from: AlterNet | Raw Story | ... The Raw Story (also stylized as RawStory) is an American online tabloid founded in 2004 by John K. Byrne. It covers current national and international political events and publishes its own editorials which tend to advocate for progressive positions. The Raw Story is a news site, bringing attention to stories that it sees as downplayed or ignored by other media outlets. It is owned by Raw Story Media, Inc. The Raw Story has been reported on and featured in On August 4, 2008, the Online News Association announced that RawStory.com was a finalist in the 2008 Online Journalism awards in the "Investigative, Small Site" category for the story, "The permanent Republican majority," about improper partisan influence in the prosecution of former Governor Don Siegelman of Alabama. The website's original reporting has also been referenced by MSNBC's Ed Schultz and Lawrence O'Donnell, The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, Real Time with Bill Maher, and Countdown with Keith Olbermann. It was also referenced in 2011 by The Telegraph [The Daily Telegraph] newspaper, as being the news website that first revealed a contract had been awarded to Ntrepid by United States Central Command as part of Operation Earnest Voice, intended to deploy operatives to create fake online personas abroad. According to the site's masthead, as of July 2018, the editor and publisher is Roxanne Cooper. Other editors include Eric W. Dolan, managing editor, and senior editors David Edwards, Travis Gettys, Martin Cizmar, Tana Ganeva and Sarah Burris. Raw Story is wholly owned by Raw Story Media, Inc. John K. Byrne - founder, chairman and CEO, partner; and, Michael Rogers - vice chairman and managing director, partner. Raw Story partners John K. Byrne and Michael Rogers announced on April 2, 2018, that they had acquired AlterNet via a newly created company "AlterNet Media." Byrne stated, "AlterNet will continue to carry content from the Independent Media Institute, its prior owner, and former AlterNet writers may appear with Independent Media Institute bylines. On 2018-04-09, it was announced that AlterNet was acquired by owners of Raw Story, an online news organization, under the newly created company AlterNet Media. In an online statement, Raw Story founder John K. Byrne stated, "AlterNet will continue to carry content from the Independent Media Institute, its prior owner. Thus, much of the content you expect will remain the same. You will see articles by former AlterNet writers appearing with the Independent Media Institute byline." [Source: Wikipedia, 2021-10-15.] MediaBiasFactCheck, captured 2020-09-09. Factual Reporting: MIXED Left Bias. These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. Overall, we rate Raw Story "Left Biased" based on story selection that favors the left and "Mixed" for factual reporting due to half-true, false and unproven claims, as well as promotion of mild pseudoscience misinformation. In review, Raw Story is mostly a news aggregation site that aggregates news from When it comes to sourcing, Raw Story generally sources to credible media outlets such as the Washington Blade, Las Vegas Review-Journal, and the St. Louis Post Dispatch. In general, story selection always favors the left and frequently has an anti-Trump tone. Raw Story has published misleading articles that promote miracle cures such as this one: "Scientists discover virus that kills all grades of breast cancer 'within seven days'." This headline is misleading, as within the article they clearly state "but not in normal mammary epithelial cells." When it comes to consensus science, they sometimes promote anti-GMO propaganda, however they also publish credible scientifically sound information as well. A factual search reveals a Half-True claim from Politifact as well as a false claim and an Unproven claim with Snopes. Overall, we rate Raw Story Left Biased based on story selection that favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to a half-true, false and unproven claims, as well as promotion of mild pseudoscience misinformation. (5/15/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 7/26/2019) MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Real News Network (TRNN) Left biased based on story selection that favors the left but with minimally loaded wording. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to strong sourcing and a clean fact check record. Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. π STOP! Excluded from sources. Notorious conspiracy, disinformation and troll site similar to See: Notable associations: Co-founder Ezra Levant, a racist / xenophobic, litigious "free-speech" troll, with past affiliations with the Co-founder Brian Lilley Jack Posobiec, Former Sun News Network Procession of other white supremacist, neo-Nazi, ... trolls ... MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Register Least Biased based on minimal editorializing. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a clean fact check record. Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. Founded in 1994, The Register is a British Technology news and opinion site based in London, U.K. The Register was founded by Mike Magee, John Lettice, and Ross Alderson and published by Situation Publishing Ltd. The Register provides news coverage related to software, hardware, networking, science, tech culture, and IT. Situation Publishing Ltd. owns and publishes The Register. Advertising generates revenue. The Register publishes news related to software, hardware, networking, science, tech culture, and IT. They utilize minimally loaded words in their articles, and they do present low biased coverage of science news and source verifiable credible sources. Editorially, they have regular columnists who produce opinion pieces that usually stay away from politics. In general, they are considered least biased and could also fit into the pro-science category. None to date. π STOP! Excluded from sources. Notorious conspiracy theory, disinformation site, owned by Salem Media Group. See: Salem Media Group subentry, this page. See also main article: Regnery Publishing. π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to funding of Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, launched 2019-11 with funding that included half a million dollars each from the Open Society Foundations (George Soros) and the ResponsibleStatecraft.org: About; "Responsible Statecraft is the online magazine of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. Responsible Statecraft publishes outside contributors and reporters as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news to Formation: 2019 | Type: 501(c)(3) organization | Tax ID no.: 84-2285143 | Website; QuincyInst.org The Initial funding for the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, in November 2019-11, includes half a million dollars each from the Open Society Foundations (George Soros) and the The think tank (Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft) is named after U.S. President John Quincy Adams, who as Secretary of State said, in a speech on 1821-07-04, that the U.S. "goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy." The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft has been described as " realist" and advocating for "restraint" in orientation. David Klion writes: "Quincy's founding members say again and again that 9/11 and the Iraq War were turning points in their careers." The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft has been described as having significant agreements with the foreign policy of the Trump administration. Writing in Survival - the journal of the International Institute for Strategic Studies - In 2020-01, Republican U.S. Senator Tom Cotton accused the Quincy Institute of antisemitism, describing the Quincy Institute as an "isolationist, blame America First money pit for so-called scholars who've written that American foreign policy could be fixed if only it were rid of the malign influence of Jewish money." Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft president Andrew Bacevich described The Jerusalem Post identified a number of fellows of the Quincy Institute who have been According to an 2021-04 Tablet article, Quincy Institute fellows have taken public positions denying the Uyghur genocide. According to the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, its co-founding leaders include: Andrew Bacevich, President Eli Clifton [local copy], Senior Advisor Suzanne DiMaggio [local copy | spouse: Ben Allison, American double bassist, composer, producer, bandleader, educator], Chairman Trita Parsi, Executive Vice President See also: MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. In April 2008, the British company In 2018, Project of: The Center for Economic and Policy Research "The Revolving Door Project (RDP), a project of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), scrutinizes executive branch appointees to ensure they use their office to serve the broad public interest, rather than to entrench corporate power or seek personal advancement. "Many of the deep rules that govern our rigged economy are written within the executive branch and outside the purview of most of civil society. From the semi-independent bureaus of the Treasury Department (the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the IRS) to the Federal Reserve, OMB, FTC, and beyond, executive branch personnel play a significant role in determining the fundamental rules that govern our economy. "The Revolving Door Project educates civil society in order to counteract the advantage that Wall Street and corporate America have in this rule writing process. We do this by alerting and educating the media and activists when hardworking people are being taken advantage of and clarifying by whom. If we want the executive branch to write rules that structure the economy away from rent extraction and in the direction of greater economic equality, we need to ensure the right people hold key executive branch positions like the Treasury Secretary and SEC Commissioner. The executive branch needs to empower dedicated civil servants rather than self-interested people rotating between relatively short stints in government and longer stints in the very industries they're supposed to regulate." MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Rewire News Group Left Biased based on reporting and policy positions that almost always favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Factual Reporting: HIGH. Rewire News Group is a website focused on reproductive and sexual health from a pro-reproductive rights perspective. The website began as a UN Foundation blog in 2006 and became its own nonprofit organization in January 2012. The publication focuses on reproductive and sexual health from a pro-reproductive rights perspective. It also covers issues such as racial, environmental, immigration, and economic justice. According to their about page "We publish news, analysis, and investigative reporting created by professional journalists, editors, and multimedia experts. We also offer vigorous commentary, debate, and opinion rooted in fact and considered thinking." The current President and editor is Galina Espinoza. Rewire.news is a nonprofit organization that is funded through donations. In review, Rewire News Group primarily covers reproductive news with moderately loaded words such this: Telemedicine Abortion Is Safe, No Matter What Anti-Choice Lawmakers Claim. This story is properly sourced to medical journals as well as the think tank Guttmacher Institute and Amnesty International. Other stories cover economic justice such as this: "Trump's Newest Plan for SNAP Would Trap Workers in Poverty." Again, this is sourced properly to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. When it comes to science they support the consensus on climate change. In general, Rewire News Group reports news with a strong left-leaning political bias but properly sources their information to factual content. None to date. π STOP! Excluded from sources. "Ricocet.com" ["dot com"] is an online disinformation source that includes content and discussion (e.g.) associated with the disinformation troll Mark Steyn. Ricochet.media ["dot media;" below] - a high quality, reputable Canadian news site - makes no mention of Mark Steyn. Wikipedia entry. Ricochet.com is an online community portal founded as a "politics website intended to resemble Facebook and Twitter." It is a subscription site which has articles posted by contributors and members on which members can comment and discuss the issues raised. The site describes itself as a place for "center-right conversation" and is listed on a libertarian website as being for "Conservative/National Review Types." Members pay a fee to post and comment on the website. The site was started in May 2010 and founded by Rob Long and Peter Robinson. Its flagship podcast is hosted by Long, Robinson, and Minneapolis writer James Lileks. Bethany Mandel is one of the current editors. Past editors have included Mollie Hemingway and Claire Berlinski. Ricochet.com serves as a host for conservative podcasts including ones produced by National Review. In 2016, the site grouped its podcasts into the Ricochet Network which can be downloaded on a group feed. Some of the podcasts are hosted or led by conservative-leaning figures such as Bill Bennett, James Delingpole, Richard Epstein, Erick Erickson, Jim Geraghty, Jonah Goldberg, Victor Davis Hanson, Steve Hayward, Andrew Klavan, Jay Nordlinger, Larry O'Connor, John Podhoretz, Byron York, John Yoo, and Toby Young. Ricochet.media ["dot media"] is a high quality, reputable Canadian news site. "Ricocet.com" ["dot com"] is an online disinformation source that includes content and discussion (e.g.) associated with the disinformation troll Mark Steyn. We practise public-interest journalism. Media concentration, layoffs, advertising so pervasive it becomes the content: the world of journalism is in crisis. Ricochet is an audacious response to a difficult context. Independent, dedicated to investigative journalism and incisive opinion, Ricochet seeks to illuminate the cultural and political diversity within Canada. Ricochet is the product of collaboration between anglophones and francophones in a plurinational Canada, informed by an understanding of our colonial histories and supportive of contemporary Indigenous struggles. Bringing together English and French, Ricochet is composed of two distinct editions that maintain editorial independence. Crowdfunded and serving the public interest, Ricochet provides entirely free content, contrary to the current tendency to hide information behind paywalls. By supporting a new model of media, our readers are financing real independent journalism. Founded in 2014, Ricochet is a multiplatform news outlet, with offices in Vancouver and Montreal. No editor may assign a story, and no journalist may cover one, in which they have a current personal or pecuniary interest. In the case of opinion writing, any current personal or pecuniary interest should be disclosed. [2020-09-08] Christopher Curtis: Why I'm quitting Postmedia Network to test a new model of journalism. Award-winning journalist launches new reporting project with Ricochet π STOP! Excluded from sources. A 2013 article in Der Spiegel noted that The launch of In 2015, Journalists at For example, A report by See also [theGuardian.com, 2017-11-29]: 24-hour Putin people: my week watching Kremlin 'propaganda channel' "More than outright lies, π STOP! Excluded from sources (notoriously egregious disinformation source). This section disambiguates Rupert Murdoch's media empire, which has undergone convoluted changes of ownership and rebranding - all of which are considered disinformation sources and are hence excluded as informational sources on Persagen.com. Per the notes below, present-day News Corp (established in 2013) owns Rupert Murdoch's print interests (e.g.: Sky News Australia Sky News New Zealand; ...), and other media interests (including Fox News) are all excluded from Persagen.com. The original incarnation of News Corporation (abbreviated News Corp.) was an American multinational mass media corporation operated and owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch and headquartered in New York City. Prior to its split in 2013, News Corporation was the world's fourth-largest media group in terms of revenue, and News Corporation had become a media powerhouse since its inception, almost dominating the news, television, film and print industries. On June 28, 2012, after concerns from shareholders in response to its recent scandals and to "unlock even greater long-term shareholder value", founder Rupert Murdoch announced that News Corporation's assets would be split into two publicly traded companies, one oriented towards media, and the other towards publishing. The corporate spin-off formally took place on June 28, 2013; where the present News Corp. was renamed Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc., doing business as On July 27, 2018, Thus, the successors to Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. are Fox Corporation (U.S. broadcasting, news and national sports assets), and The Fox Corporation (stylized in all-caps as the FOX Corporation) is an American mass media company operated and owned by Rupert Murdoch and headquartered in New York City. Fox Corporation was formed in 2019 as a result of the acquisition of Twenty-First Century Fox by Fox Corporation's divisions include the Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, [notorious disinformation source] Fox News, Fox Business, the national operations of Fox Sports, and others. Fox Corporation's sister company under Rupert Murdoch's control - the present-day News Corp - holds Murdoch's print interests and other media assets. Present-day News Corp (established in 2013) owns Rupert Murdoch's print interests (e.g.: Sky News Australia Sky News New Zealand; ...), and other media interests (including Fox News). All of those sources are excluded as informational sources for Persagen.com. Historically, the British media company Sky News (U.K. | Sky UK) has incurred criticism over the years, much of it centred on overcharging, anti-competitive practices, and the business practices and undue political influence of its one-time majority owner News Corporation (Rupert Murdoch's media company that existed from 1980 to 2013). In 2013 News Corporation's assets were split into two publicly traded companies A 2016-12 attempt by Returning to the historical claims that Sky News may have been biased throughout the 1990s and 2000s due to minority ownership by π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to associations with the Christian right, Council for National Policy member Stuart Epperson, libertarian propagandist Lawrence Allen "Larry" Elder, ... Ontology: Culture - Cultural studies - Media culture - Deception - Media manipulation - Propaganda - Propaganda techniques - Disinformation - News outlets - Salem Media Group Source: Wikipedia. Salem Media Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SALM; formerly Salem Communications Corporation) is an American radio broadcaster, internet content provider, and magazine and book publisher based in Camarillo, California, targeting audiences interested in Christian values and what it describes as "family-themed content and conservative values." In addition to its radio properties, the company owns Salem Radio Network, which syndicates talk, news and music programing to approximately 2,400 affiliates; Salem Media Representatives, a radio advertising company; Salem Web Network, an internet provider of Christian content and online streaming with over 100 Christian content and conservative opinion websites; and Salem Publishing, a publisher of Christian themed magazines. Salem owns 117 radio stations in 38 markets, including 60 stations in the top 25 markets and 29 in the top 10, making it tied with Entercom for fifth-largest radio broadcaster. FamilyTalk is a Christian-themed talk format on Sirius XM Radio Channel 131. Additionally, Salem owns conservative websites Townhall.com, RedState, Hot Air, and PJ Media, as well as Twitter aggregator Twitchy. ... Salem Radio Network is a satellite radio network serving general market News/Talk stations and Christian-formatted stations through affiliate partnerships serving more than 2,700 radio stations. ... Salem Media Group was founded by brothers-in-law Through his involvement in Salem Media Group, Council for National Policy member Stuart Epperson is a member of the board of directors of the National Religious Broadcasters Association. [Source: Wikipedia.] The founders of Salem Communications supports various religious causes. In 2005, Stuart Epperson was reported in Time Magazine as one of the "25 Most Influential Evangelicals in America". In 2004 he co-chaired "Americans of Faith", a religiously based In the early 1980s Many of Salem's stations are licensed to subsidiaries, organized by geographical area and media cluster as the company has acquired new stations and their previous licensees. Salem Communications Corp acquired Twitter curation site, Twitchy.com. In January 2014, the Company announced the acquisition of the assets of Eagle Publishing, including Regnery Publishing, Human Events [published by Eagle Publishing], and RedState, as well as sister companies Eagle Financial Publications and Eagle Wellness. On February 23, 2015, Salem Communications changed its name to Salem Media Group. In 2015, Salem Media Group expanded their digital platform with acquisitions of several businesses and assets, including DividendYieldHunter.com, Stockinvestor.com; DividendInvestor.com, a Spanish Bible mobile app, along with its related website and Facebook properties; the DailyBible mobile app; the Daily Bible Devotion mobile app; and also Bryan Perry's Newsletters. In 2016, Salem Media Group continued to expand by acquiring the websites ChristianConcertAlerts.com, Historyonthenet.com and Authentichistory.com; as well as Mike Turner's line of investment products, including TurnerTrends.com; the Retirement Watch newsletter and website, Retirementwatch.com; and the King James Bible mobile application. Salem Media Group also acquired Mill City Press from Hillcrest Publishing Group, Inc. In July 2017, Salem Media Group merged DividendYieldHunter.com and transferred all content into DividendInvestor.com. In March 2019, political writer Raheem Kassam and lawyer Will Chamberlain purchased Human Events from Salem Media Group for $300,000. π STOP! Excluded from sources. AlterNet.org often lifts articles from Daily Kos, which due to questionable content is excluded from sources. Alternet also frequently lifts articles from Salon.com (and sometimes vice versa). While MediaBiasFactCheck.com rates Salon.com as "mostly factual," due to the overlap between content posted and reposted on DailyKos.com, AlterNet.org, and Salon.com I am excluding these three sources. Some Salon content is republished on AlterNet. See also: Raw Story MediaBiasFactCheck.com: Factual Reporting: HIGH Funded by / Ownership. Salon is owned by the Salon Media Group and is funded through periodic cash infusions from John Warnock and William Hambrecht. Revenue is generated through online advertising as well as subscription fees for exclusive content and sales from the marketplace. Analysis / Bias. Overall, we rate Salon Left Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the left and endorsements of political positions that are affiliated with the Democratic Party. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and adherence to the consensus of science. In review, Salon focuses on U.S. politics and current affairs. Story selection almost always favors the left and there is frequent use of loaded emotional language such as this: "What campus free speech? Arizona case shows how far the right will go to stifle dissent." This story, like most on Salon is properly sourced to credible media such as A factual search reveals that they have been a part of a failed a fact check, but not the primary source. Overall, we rate Salon Left Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the left and endorsements of political positions that are affiliated with the Democratic Party. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and adherence to the consensus of science. ( β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize, particularly sources. See also: The Chronicle herald. SOURCE: Wikipedia, captured 2020-09-18 SaltWire Network Inc. is a Canadian newspaper publishing company owned by the Dennis-Lever family of Halifax, Nova Scotia. Saltwire owns and publishes 35 daily and weekly newspapers in Atlantic Canada. Combined with the Chronicle Herald's existing community newspaper holdings, in 2017 the company published 35 titles overall, mainly acquired from Transcontinental Media. On April 13, 2017, Halifax's independently-owned The Chronicle Herald announced its acquisition of 27 newspapers in the region from Transcontinental Media, via the newly-formed parent company SaltWire Network. The company had begun a gradual exit from mainstream publishing in order to focus on specialty media and educational publishing. The exact purchase price was not disclosed, although business analysts estimated that the publications were worth approximately $30 million in total. The transaction was criticized by a number of analysts, as it occurred in the middle of a strike by Chronicle Herald employees during which the paper had claimed declining revenues as its reason for demanding major concessions including wage reductions, reduced pension contributions and the removal of several staff divisions from the bargaining unit. In June 2018, SaltWire Network changed the Carbonear-based weekly newspaper, "The Compass," from a subscriber model to a free total market product deliver as a flyer package wrap. In July 2019, SaltWire Network closed "The Beacon," "The Advertiser," "The Pilot," and "The Nor'wester," and merged them into a free weekly known as "The Central Voice" - which began publication on August 1, 2018. In March 2019, all SaltWire publications introduced metered paywalls. In March 2019, SaltWire announced the sale of 10 of its buildings across Atlantic Canada. Also in March 2019, the company terminated its affiliation with the In April 2019, SaltWire announced it was turning "The Western Star" into a weekly delivered free to consumers as a flyer wrap. This resulted in the layoff of around 30 employees. Independent delivery contractors were also affected. At the same time, it was announced that the two Labrador weeklies would merge into one called "The Labrador Voice." In April 2019, SaltWire filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia against Transcontinental, accusing it of overstating and misrepresenting details surrounding the revenue of the papers it had acquired. The company threatened a counter-suit, stating that the sale was "conducted based on fair, accurate and timely information," and accusing SaltWire of failing to "fulfil its payment obligations." [ ... snip ... ] MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Science Daily a Pro-Science Source based on proper scientific sourcing and a clean fact check record. Bias Rating: PRO-SCIENCE | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. Founded in 1995 by married couple Dan and Michele Hogan, Science Daily is an American news website for topical science articles. It features articles on a wide variety of science topics, including astronomy, exoplanets, computer science, nanotechnology, medicine, psychology, sociology, anthropology, biology, geology, climate, space, physics, mathematics, chemistry, archaeology, paleontology, and others. Science Daily is held by Science Daily LLC, which Dan and Michele Hogan own. The website generates revenue through online advertising. In review, Science Daily is primarily a science news aggregation and curation site. The articles are selected from news releases submitted by universities and other research institutions. There is little bias exhibited as they tend only to publish pro-science information. This is a popular science site that summarizes reports in one paragraph and then links to the full article. They never skew data and summarize properly, based on our numerous reviews. None to date. β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content, due to pronounced political bias; carefully scrutinize. website | formerly: Firedoglake Persons: Jane Hamsher (born Jane Murphy), creator of Firedoglake: Firedoglake (abbreviated as FDL) was an American collaborative blog that described itself as a "leading progressive news site, online community, and action organization". Established by film producer Jane Hamsher in 2004, Firedoglake served as a platform for Hamsher, other writers and commenters to engage in debate and activism. Hamsher shut down Firedoglake on 2015-08-01, citing health reasons, and announced that all posts would be archived at the Shadowproof website. MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Shadowproof Left Biased based on editorial positions that favor a progressive perspective. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record. Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. Shadowproof is a progressive news website and activist organization formed in 2015 by Kevin Gosztola and FDL Media Group owns Shadowproof. Donations generate revenue. In review, Shadowproof uses emotional language both in their headlines and articles such as "Where Was President Obama's 'Decency' When He Was Deporting Dreamers?", "Trump Is Taking Advantage of the Fact That Obamacare Was Made To Be Broken", and "Read DEA Chief's Resignation Memo Admonishing Trump For Endorsing Police Misconduct." Shadowproof is a strong advocate for a single-payer health care system, and they dedicated one category solely to single-payer under the category "ROAD TO SINGLE-PAYER." They also focus on incarceration and prisoners' rights under the subsection "Prison Protest." Overall, Shadowproof uses credible media sources such as The Boston Globe, None in the last 5 years. β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize. See also Rupert Murdoch's Media Holdings, which disambiguates and clarifies Rupert Murdoch's media empire (past and present). Wikipedia entry. | Criticisms of Sky UK The British media company Sky UK has incurred criticism over the years, much of it centred on overcharging, anti-competitive practices, and the business practices and undue political influence of its one-time majority owner News Corporation [owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch; later split into FOX News, and News Corp] ... MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Sky News Least Biased based on balanced news coverage and a reasonably balanced op-ed page. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to a reasonable fact check record. Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. Founded in 1989 by Rupert Murdoch, Sky News is a British news organization, which operates a TV network of the same name [Sky News], a radio news service, and news distribution through online channels. Sky News Sky News is owned by the Comcast Corporation as of 2018-11, and is funded through advertising. Rupert Murdoch is no longer affiliated with Sky News UK [see Rupert Murdoch's Media Holdings continued Murdoch holdings, including Sky News Australia]. This review covers [non-Murdoch owned] U.K. website content only. Sky News reports on the U.K., World, Politics, U.S., Ocean Rescue, Science & Technology, Business, Arts & Entertainment, and Offbeat. Sky News utilizes moderate to minimally loaded language in headlines and articles such as this: "Climate change demos in London: Police face challenges dealing with protesters." In another article, there is the use of moderate loaded language that covers both sides: "May and Corbyn highlight persecution of Christians and refugee crisis in Easter messages." This article, like most on Sky News, does not provide hyperlinked sourcing, but rather relies on quotes and first-person accounts. A review of the opinion page reflects mostly balanced coverage with some clearly in favor of the left. In general, Sky News reporting is balanced and low biased, with op-ed's having a slight lean left. Under Rupert Murdoch [until 2018], Sky News was frequently accused of having a right-wing bias, however, the left-leaning New Statesman did not agree - in a 2010 article concluding that Sky News was impartial. Poll about support for violence against MPs is flawed - INCORRECT. β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize. Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY. In 2018-09 the Chairman and Editor-in-Chief, In review, When implemented, Note: no Wikipedia entry (2022-01-18)! Website: ReadSludge.com | About: " " "We never take money from advertisers, interest groups, or corporations, so we are solely focused on providing information that our readers value. Because we don't rely on advertisements for revenue, we never produce "clickbait" to pay our bills and we never shy away from topics that challenge powerful interests. " The The Participatory Politics Foundation has created [ ... snip ... Source; Wikipedia, 2022-01-18.] The As of 2019-03, In 2014-11, the board of [ ... snip ... Source: Wikipedia, 2022-01-18.] " "One subscription fee gives readers access to all nine of our member publications, each of which operates independently under the cooperative umbrella. Shares in the cooperative are equal and cannot be sold or transferred, with one share allocated to each publication. No publication can own more than one share. This "Our goal is to expand [ ... snip ... Source; theBrick.house, 2022-01-18.] MediaBiasFactCheck.com (2020-08-17): overall, we rate Factual Reporting: HIGH. Founded in 2018, In review, Climate: A general review of the climate category reveals a strongly left-leaning bias with most stories detailing how the Defense: A general review of the defense category reveals a left-leaning bias with most stories detailing how money influences hawkishness and corporate influence. For example, this story details how Hate: This category profiles how corporations and foundations profit or promote hate. For example, this story, which indicates Health: This category primarily focuses on big pharma's role in politics. For example, "Chair of Pharma-Funded Blue Dogs Pushes for Drug Company Protections in New NAFTA." This story is properly sourced to 2020: This category shows how corporate money is influencing candidates. It highlights both the establishment Tech: This category covers tech cover-ups and the influence of money from tech companies, for example, this: "The Facebook Settlement Amounts to Bribery of a Federal Agency." This story was republished from In general, story selection favors the progressive left through opposition to corporate influence in politics, and all information is very well sourced to credible information and outlets.
None in the Last 5 years. π STOP! Excluded from sources. See also (this file):
History
History
Funded by / Ownership
Quanta Magazine
History
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Quillette [Australia]Quillette
rabble.ca [Canada]
Raw Story, TheCitation in other media
Management
Raw Story Media, Inc.
Analysis / Bias
Real News Network
Rebel News [Canada]
The Register
History
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Regnery Publishing
Responsible Statecraft
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
History
Criticism
Co-founders
Reuters
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Revolving Door Project
Rewire News Group
History
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Ricochet.com
Ricochet.media
Ricochet.media: About
Ricochet.media: Conflict Policy
Ricochet.media: Miscellany
RT.com | RT (TV network)RT.com (<< Wikipedia entry)Airing Conspiracy Theories
Rupert Murdoch's Media Holdings
Salem Media Group [Salem Radio Network | ...]
History
Salon
SaltWire Network [Canada]
This page last modified: 2020-08-17 16:14:38 -0700 (PST)
History
Publications
Science Daily
History
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Shadowproof | Shadowproof.com
History
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Sky News (U.K.)
History
has [had, through former Murdoch ownership] sister outlets around the world such as Australia, Arabia, and Ireland. Sky News has won numerous awards including in 2018 being named Royal Television Society News Channel of the Year, the eleventh time the channel had won the award.Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Slate | Slate Magazine
History
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
Sludge
Participatory Politics Foundation
Institute for Nonprofit News
History
The Brick House Cooperative
History
Funded by / Ownership
Analysis / Bias
Failed Fact Checks
SourceWatch.org
I have been collecting data (articles, information, ...) on nonprofit "dark money" organizations and influencers. Due to the anonymity of many of the donors and other obfuscations: use of aliases, ...) it can be difficult to find information on those groups via Wikipedia and web searches.
Although SourceWatch.org and InfluenceWatch.org provide relatively comprehensive Wikipedia-like entries for many of these nonprofits, closer inspection of the entries provide by SourceWatch and InfluenceWatch raise concerns regarding the deep-rooted biases inherent in each of those sites.
The obfuscation of disinformation that I have encountered during my research, that similarly affects everyone doing online research, is indicated in the following exemplar.
SourceWatch.org - an online project of the
The Wikipedia page for the
π STOP! warning), it also states that the
"According to the conservative news website Watchdog.org, the
Apropos to this discussion, I append this statement to my version of the [George Soros] "Open Society Foundations" Wikipedia page:
Not indicated in this Wikipedia entry:
George Soros / Open Society Foundations is a known, very significant funder of - or is a member of groups (e.g. Democracy Alliance that recommend donations to - the highly malignant fake news / disinformation campaign umbrella group, the Sixteen Thirty Fund: : refer here | here | here, and | here.
In diametric opposition, another source - "InfluenceWatch.org" - provides highly critical overviews of both the
That sounds alarming, so I searched Wikipedia for "InfluenceWatch" - which, in Wikipedia, redirects to the Capital Research Center which it describes as
"an American conservative and libertarian non-profit organization located in Washington, D.C."
That sounds good; however, later in that Wikipedia entry:
"CRC was founded in 1984 by Willa Johnson, former senior vice president of The Heritage Foundation, ... In 2011, Politico reported that CRC had received millions of dollars from conservative philanthropists over the years, with a total budget in 2009 of $1.4 million. Donors have included foundations run by the Koch Family, the Scaife Family Foundations, and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation [Bradley Foundation]. As of 2017, CRC had received more than $265,000 from
Ouch - those are major anonymizers, lobbyists, and disinformation campaigners!
Aside: In their "Bradley Files," the
Another
π STOP! warning re: InfluenceWatch.com: in a 2018-02-04 disinformation / misinformation article by The Heritage Foundation, Rebecca Hagelin attacked George Soros and his Open Society Foundations - concluding with
"... Visit sites where there are copies of legal documents and filings that reveal the truth. Three great resources are DiscovertheNetworks.org, InfluenceWatch.org and AmericanEvangelicals.com. ..."
The fact that an appallingly malicious group like The Heritage Foundation and its minions refer you to those sites casts doubt on the true purpose of those sites, and the veracity of their content!
The discussion above highlights the need to question and critically evaluate all source data, comparing it to multiple sources and validating it as much as possible (discounting those sources and content known to be disreputable).
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to Chinese influences.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com; overall, we rate The South China Morning Post Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1903 by Australian Chinese revolutionary Tse Tsan-tai and British journalist Alfred Cunningham, the South China Morning Post is a Hong Kong-based English-language newspaper. The South China Morning Post provides news, business, arts, tech, and culture for global readers, focusing on China and Asia. According to its about page, the South China Morning Post's mission is to "Lead the global conversation about China." The South China Morning Post is also Hong Kong's newspaper of record and publishes fashion magazines, including Harper's Bazaar, Cosmopolitan, Elle, Esquire, and The Peak.
On April 5, 2016, Alibaba Group acquired The South China Morning Post Group in a $266 million deal, including the South China Morning Post. Former CEO of Digg, Gary Liu is CEO of the South China Morning Post since 2017. Tammy Tam Wai Yee is the Editor-in-Chief. For a complete list of corporate executives, please see here.
The South China Morning Post is owned by Alibaba Group and published by South China Morning Post Publishers Limited. It is funded through advertising and subscriptions.
According to a Quartz article dated 2017, they state that after being acquired by Alibaba Group, the South China Morning Post's narrative became more pro-China. The article also quotes Joseph Tsai, Alibaba's co-founder, and vice-chairman, as saying, "We wanted to tell the biggest story of our lifetime, which is China." According to the NY Times, the new mission of the South China Morning Post is "improving China's image overseas and combating what it sees as anti-Chinese bias in the foreign media."
In review, The South China Morning Post publishes stories with emotionally loaded headlines such as ...
Although South China Morning Post has been accused of promoting China, we find evidence that they cover both sides by being critical of China and praising them.
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
Defunct: closed 2015-02-13.
... The
Writing several years after leaving
On the reason for the channel's failure, Caldwell wrote: "Simply put, if
Former anchor Krista Erickson wrote an article for National Newswatch in 2015 that singled out former
[ ... snip ... ]
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to tabloid journalism, Postmedia Network's history of anti-transgender bias, American part-ownership, declining financials, ties to United States
was the owner of several tabloid and broadsheet newspapers in Canada and the 49 percent owner of the now defunct . It was a subsidiary of Quebecor Media.
On October 6, 2014,
Quebecor had previously sold its community newspapers in Quebec to TC Transcontinental in June 2014, under a deal first announced in December 2013.
[ ... snip ... ]
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize, particularly sources due to concern over funding to the Poynter Institute from the notoriously neoliberal billionaire Charles Koch and left-wing billionaire George Soros. PolitiFact was founded by the Tampa Bay Times, which is a for-profit new organization owned by the non-profit Poynter Institute, a preeminent journalism training organization.
See also: PolitiFact (founded by the Tampa Bay Times).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the Tampa Bay Times Left-Center biased based on editorial positions that mostly favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1884, the Tampa Bay Times, previously named the St. Petersburg Times through 2011, is an American broadsheet newspaper published in St. Petersburg, Florida. The paper has won the Pulitzer Prize 12 times in its history.
In 2007, the then-St. Petersburg Times launched IFCN fact-checker Politifact, which also won a Pulitzer for fact-checking. In 2018, Politifact was acquired by the Poynter Institute for Media Studies.
The Tampa Bay Times is published by the Times Publishing Company, owned by the Poynter Institute for Media Studies, a nonprofit journalism school directly adjacent to the University of South Florida St. Petersburg campus. Poynter is https://www.poynter.org/major-funders/funded by many donors, including the Charles Koch Foundation on the Right and George Soros' Open Society Foundations on the Left. The newspaper generates revenue through advertising and subscription fees.
The Tampa Bay Times publishes original news and investigative reporting covering the Tampa Bay and Florida region. National and International news is republished through
Editorially, the Tampa Bay Times typically endorses Democratic candidates. For example, they have endorsed the Democratic Presidential Candidate every time since 1980. Further, in local elections, such as 2018, they endorsed all Democratic candidates. A review of the Opinion section also reveals a left-leaning bias with most editorials favorable to liberal policies such as this: "Two steps up, one step back on Florida voting rights | Editorial." In general, the Tampa Bay Times reports news factually and with minimal bias; however, editorially, they lean moderately left.
None to date.
Wikipedia entry.
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1983, the
The first website set up by the
Comment: Note that the MediaBiasFactCheck.com entry for the
In September 1997, the
The
In review, the primary purpose of the
None to date.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Time Magazine Left-Center biased based on story selection that mostly favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1923, Time Magazine is an American weekly news magazine published in New York City. The current managing editor is Edward Felsenthal. Since 2000, Time Magazine has undergone several ownership changes and mergers. In 2000, Time Inc. became a part of AOL Time Warner [WarnerMedia] and then in 2017 was purchased by the Meredith Corporation. After only 6 weeks, the Meredith Corporation sold Time Magazine to Marc Benioff and his wife Lynne for $190 million. Benioff is the billionaire founder of Salesforce.com and is an activist related to left-leaning causes such as equal pay for equal work, affordable health care, and support for a livable wage.
Time Magazine is owned by Marc and Lynne Benioff and is funded through subscriptions, sponsored content, and advertising sales.
In review, Time Magazine a is a journalism magazine the covers current events and politics. Time Magazine utilizes loaded language in headlines such as this: "President Trump Is Making Baseless Claims About the Migrant Caravan. Here Are the Facts." The information contained in articles is generally well-sourced and linked to credible factual sources. Story selection mostly favors the left with articles such as this: "Obama Rails Against Republicans in Fiery Nevada Rally." While Time Magazine is clearly biased in favor of left-leaning causes, they display a strong anti-Trump bias with daily articles denigrating his policies and actions. It is important to note that holding an anti-Trump bias is not necessarily a pro-left wing bias as many centrist and right-center sources also report against President Trump's character and policies.
None to date.
Website:
(Wikipedia, 2022-01-20;
Thomas Engelhardt has been an editor for more than 30 years, working in
Thomas Engelhardt once described the editing process as "...more like a
[ ... snip ... ]
(MediaBiasFactCheck.com, 2020-12-25)
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
In review,
None in the Last 5 years.
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to Postmedia Network's history of
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
The
In review, the
None to date.
... The
The
... Editorially, the paper frequently follows the positions of traditional Canadian/British
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
[Wikipedia, 2021-03-01] Torstar Corporation is a Canadian mass media company which primarily publishes daily and community newspapers. In addition to the Toronto Star, its flagship and namesake, Torstar also publishes daily newspapers in Hamilton, Peterborough, Niagara Region, and Waterloo Region. The corporation was initially established in 1958 to take over operations of the Star from the Atkinson Foundation after a provincial law banned charitable organizations from owning for-profit entities. From 1958 to 2020, the class A shares of Torstar were held by the families of the original Atkinson Foundation trustees. The private investment firm NordStar Capital LP, owned by Jordan Bitove and Paul Rivett, officially acquired Torstar on August 5, 2020.
[2021-03-01] Torstar to launch online casino to help fund its journalism. [Torstar, ] Owner of Toronto Star, Hamilton Spectator and other papers getting into online gambling.
[2020-05-27] Toronto Star's parent company was just bought out - buyers are donors to Maxime Bernier and the Conservative Party
[2020-05-26] Torstar agrees to $52M sale to NordStar Capital. Company owns Toronto Star and 70 other publications
From the Wikipedia entry.
... Former New York City mayor
The Trace partners with other national and local media organizations, including:
In a partnership with
The Trace keeps track of NRA spending on elections. The NRA broke its own record of $31.7 million in 2014 with $36.3 million in 2016 in support of Donald Trump's candidacy for president.
[ ... snip ... ]
From the MediaBiasFactCheck.com entry.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
The Trace is an American non-profit journalism outlet devoted to gun-related news in the United States. It was established in 2015 with seed money from the gun control advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety, which was founded by former New York City mayor
In review, The Trace publishes statistics and news stories that highlight the dangers of guns and the need for gun control. The Trace is highly factual through the use of official and scientific sources such as the CDC,
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
"I chose the name "
"... Our focus is on front groups, corporations, and people underwriting a reactionary agenda that undermines our nation's commitment to core principles: ...
"... iwfexposed.org, which focus on groups distorting our democracy. Please sign up through our contact form to get my updates about breaking news, breakthrough research, and compelling stories that tell the truth and expose the liars funded by reactionary front groups, corporations, and CEOs and their heirs.
"
Executive Director and Editor-in-Chief/Managing Editor:
For more on
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Truthout strongly Left Biased based on story selection and political positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to publishing a false story and promoting anti-GMO propaganda.
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
Truthout is a progressive news organization in the United States that operates a website and distributes a daily newsletter. Registered in September 2001, in Sacramento, California, Truthout publishes original political news articles, opinion pieces, video reports, and artwork. According to its about page, "Truthout works to broaden and diversify the political discussion by introducing independent voices and focusing on under-covered issues and unconventional thinking." Truthout's main areas of focus are mass incarceration, social justice, and climate change. The current editor-in-chief is Maya Schenwar.
Maya Schenwar (born November 10, 1982) is the editor-in-chief of Truthout and a writer focused on prison-related topics. Maya Schenwar is the co-author of Prison by Any Other Name: The Harmful Consequences of Popular Reforms, author of Locked Down, Locked Out: Why Prison Doesn't Work and How We Can Do Better, and a co-editor of the anthology Who Do You Serve, Who Do You Protect? Police Violence and Resistance in the United States. Maya Schenwar has written about prison issues for Truthout,
Truthout is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that is funded through donations.
In review, Truthout is a progressive news and opinion website focused on social justice and the environment. There is significant use of loaded emotional language that favors the left such as this: ...
When it comes to science, Truthout holds a negative view toward GMOs and uses highly sensationalized and conspiratorial headlines such as this: "Have Monsanto, and the Biotech Industry Turned Natural Pesticides Into GMO "Super Toxins"?"
Although Truthout has not failed a fact check by an IFCN fact checker, they have reported some stories that were not factual. For example, a reporter claimed that Karl Rove was indicted on charges when in fact, he wasn't. The reporter continued to claim without evidence. See the link here. Although this is only one example, it shows that this source should be checked when in doubt.
Comment: [2021-10-12] I had originally yellow-flagged β οΈ Truthout based on the above MediaBiasFactCheck.com "Failed Fact Checks" statements. However, I removed that flag, given this Wikipedia entry, and the political controversies surrounding Karl Rove. Karl Rove's Wikipedia page makes no mention of Jason Leopold, or Truthout.
On 2006-05-13, after Jason Leopold posted on Truthout that Karl Rove had been indicted by the grand jury investigating the Valerie Plame affair, Rove spokesman Mark Corallo denied the story, calling it "a complete fabrication". Truthout defended the story, saying on 2006-05-15 they had two sources "who were explicit about the information" published, and confirmed on May 25 that they had "three independent sources confirming that attorneys for Karl Rove were handed an indictment" on the night of 2006-05-12. The grand jury concluded without returning an indictment of Rove.
In his memoir, Courage and Consequence, Karl Rove addressed the Leopold article, writing that Jason Leopold is a "nut with internet access" and that "thirty-five reporters called [Rove's defense attorney] Robert D. Luskin or Corallo to ask about the Truthout report." According to Rove, "Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald "got a kick out of the fictitious account and e-mailed Luskin to see how he felt after such a long day."
Jason Leopold continued to write investigative pieces for Truthout, gaining more agreeable attention for his work on the British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010. Jason Leopold is now a senior investigative reporter at BuzzFeed.
On May 13, 2006, Jason Leopold reported on Truthout that Karl Rove had been indicted by the grand jury investigating the Valerie Plame affair affair. Rove spokesman Mark Corallo denied the story, calling it "a complete fabrication". Truthout vigorously defended the story saying variously that it had two or three "independent sources", before Truthout executive director, Marc Ash, issued a statement apologizing for "getting too far out in front of the news-cycle". The grand jury concluded with no indictment of Karl Rove. ...
Wikipedia,
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 2003,
The current editor is
In review,
Editorially, most stories favor the left and are properly sourced to credible media outlets or information.
The president has consistently cut funding for the Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization - FALSE
[theTyee.ca, 2022-03-01]
Editor's note:
[theTyee.ca, 2021-12-03] I'm Finishing Up as
Wikipedia entry.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate U.S. News & World Report Left-Center biased based on story selection that slightly favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1948, U.S. News & World Report is an American media company that publishes news, opinion, consumer advice, rankings, and analysis. Founded as a newsweekly magazine in 1933, U.S. News transitioned to primarily web-based publishing in 2010. U.S. News is best known today for its influential Best Colleges and Best Hospitals rankings. The current editor is Brian Kelly.
U.S. News & World Report is owned by media proprietor
In review, U.S. News and World Report primarily cover politics, finance, health, and education. They provide original content that uses minimally loaded language such as this: "Measles Exposure Possible at Chicago Airport." Like all others on the website, this story is properly sourced to credible media and organizations such as Pew Research, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and a variety of United States <.gov/em> sites. At this point, U.S. News & World Report is best known for its best-of series, such as best states, best countries, best colleges, etc. Editorially, U.S. News & World Report tends to lean slightly left through topic selection. In general, they report the news accurately and with a slight left-leaning bias.
None in the Last 5 years.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Vanity Fair Left Biased based on editorial positions that always favor the left and Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to a failed fact check.
Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL.
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to ownership by the Penske Media Corporation - noting particularly this report:
[HillReporter.com, 2021-04-01] The Demise of Rolling Stone: How A Legendary Magazine Sold Out to Trump and the Saudis
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Variety Magazine Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Factual Reporting: HIGH.
Founded in 1905, Variety Magazine and the website features breaking entertainment news, reviews, box office results, cover stories, videos, photo galleries, and more, plus a credits database, production charts, and calendar, with archive content dating back to 1905.
Variety Magazine is owned by Penske Media Corporation, which is an American digital media, publishing, and information services company based in Los Angeles and New York City. It publishes more than 20 digital and print brands, including Deadline Hollywood, Rolling Stone, WWD, BGR, and others. PMC's Chairman and CEO since founding is Jay Penske. The website is funded through advertising, sponsored content, and subscription fees.
In review, Variety Magazine typically produces original news content about the entertainment industry. Headlines are usually straightforward and low biased such as this: "'Terminator: Dark Fate' Heading for Lackluster $27 Million Launch." Some headlines are slightly sensationalized regarding celebrities, but for the most part, information is sourced accurately and the headlines describe the news story.
Editorially, Variety Magazine reports on politics as it relates to the entertainment industry. In other words, they offer minimal opinions. However, when covering President Trump they typically are negative and use loaded emotional language such as this: "Gloria Steinem on Whether Trump Should Be Impeached: 'He Was Never Elected'." In general, Variety Magazine reports factually and displays a left-leaning bias when covering politics.
None to date.
Notable properties: Deadline Hollywood | Fairchild Fashion Media | HollywoodLife.com | Robb Report | Rolling Stone | Sportico | Variety
About / History. Founded in 2009; transitioned (2015) to the National Observer.
The Vancouver Observer (Wikipedia entry).
The Vancouver Observer was an independent online newspaper, founded in 2006 by journalist Linda Solomon [Linda Solomon Wood] as an online platform for Vancouver, British Columbia bloggers, writers, reporters, photographers and filmmakers.
The Vancouver Observer won the Canadian Journalism Foundation Excellence in Journalism Award in June 2014 for local/regional reporting. Finalists in the category included Global Calgary and
Comment: Note that the Wikipedia source for The Vancouver Observer incorrectly conflates and links to Linda Solomon, an American music critic and editor born in 1937 in Boston, Massachusetts. The correct link is: Linda Solomon Wood, additionally described in her biography [local copy] on the National Observer website: "... Born and raised in Chattanooga, Tennessee ..."
The Vancouver Observer won first place in Masthead's 2010 Canadian Online Publishing Awards green division for best online-only articles for its "Lost Canadians" series, by Darren Fleet and Megan Stewart - who were both completing their master's degrees at the University of British Columbia School of Journalism, Writing, and Media at the time. The Vancouver Observer was also a finalist in three categories in the 2011 Awards: Best Overall Website, Best Online-Only Articles, and Best Newsletter.
The
π STOP! Excluded from sources. Concerns include the following items (chiefly: news aggregation rather than investigative journalism; preoccupation with wealth, growth and acquisition; focus on digital arts and trending / viral content; ...); ownership by
Wikipedia entry | YouTube computer build video controversy
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate The Verge Left-Center biased based on story selection that slightly favors the left and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing, supporting the consensus of science, and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2011, The Verge is an American technology news and media network operated by NBC Universal. It has offices in Manhattan, New York City. The network publishes news items, long-form feature stories, product reviews, podcasts, and an entertainment show. The Verge won five Webby Awards for the year 2012, including awards for Best Writing (Editorial), Best Podcast for The Vergecast, Best Visual Design, Best Consumer Electronics Site, and Best Mobile News App. The current editor is Nilay Patel [disambiguation: not Neil Patel].
The Verge is owned by
In review, The Verge primarily covers technology and science, with less emphasis on politics. However, when covering politics, they generally use minimally loaded words such as this: ...
Political news is typically related to technology or science information and not just politics in general. When it comes to science reporting, The Verge aligns with the consensus of science. The Verge does not produce political editorial content, though story selection tends to favor the left slightly.
None to date.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Source for the following: Wikipedia, 2022-03-08.
Born to Scottish parents in
During his time at
In 2018,
According to
In 2017, investigative reporting by
In review,
Claims
π STOP! Excluded from sources. Concerns include the following items (chiefly: news aggregation rather than investigative journalism; preoccupation with wealth, growth and acquisition; focus on digital arts and trending / viral content; ...); self-promotion; promotion of consumerism; ...
Update [2021-12-14]: the MediaBiasFactCheck.com analysis below is dated and superseded by the comprehensive Persagen.com analysis of the {BuzzFeed - Huffington Post / HuffPost - Vox Media} domain, consolidated under the BuzzFeed entry (above).
Specific to Vox Media, see: BuzzFeed - Vox Media Connections
See also: The Verge, which is owned by Vox Media
Bias Rating: LEFT | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 2014, Vox is a news hub run by Vox Media (not to be confused with Vox German TV channel). Co-founded by former The Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein who is also an editor. Melissa Bell is the vice president of growth and analytics, and former
[updated 2021-10-09] Matthew Yglesias (born May 18, 1981) is an American blogger and journalist who writes about economics and politics. Yglesias has written columns and articles for publications such as
Vox Media is a digital publishing network founded by Jerome Armstrong, Tyler Bleszinski, and Markos Moulitsas and based in Washington, D.C. According to a Nieman Foundation for Journalism, Vox Media has eight editorial brands and a custom advertising division. These are (sports-focused) SB Nation, (tech site) The Verge, (video game site) Polygon, (real estate blog) Curbed, (food and nightlife) Eater, (technology news) Racked, (news hub) Vox and (technology business) Recode. Further, a
According to a Politico interview with the editor, Ezra Klein, Klein describes their goal as "to use technology to improve readers' experience and understanding of events." Vox has introduced Vox Card Stacks, and with those cards, they organize information, in index card format, about all kinds of topics in the news with in-depth details but in a summary form. Some examples are: "Everything you need to know about Israel-Palestine" and "The spread of marijuana legalization, explained." Vox also has a feature called StoryStream, where they provide real-time updates to news stories.
In review, Vox looks at the issues from a progressive liberal perspective, and there is also an anti-Trump tone in their reporting. Therefore, the majority of stories are pro-left and anti-right. Further, Vox publishes stories with emotionally loaded headlines such as "Are Democrats brave enough to run a woman against Donald Trump?," and "The most depressing energy chart of the year- Coal has got to go." When it comes to sourcing, Vox typically utilizes credible sources such as
Did 200,000 Salvadorans With Temporary Protected Status Flee Natural Disaster? - FALSE (correction issued)
Did wages fall by 1.8 percent after Donald Trump's tax cut? - MOSTLY FALSE
π STOP! Excluded from sources, due to ownership by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp (sister company: Fox Corporation, owner of Fox News).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the Wall Street Journal Right-Center biased due to low biased news reporting combined with a strong right biased editorial stance. We also rate them Mostly Factual in reporting rather than High due to anti-climate, anti-science stances, and occasional misleading editorials.
Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
... A factual search reveals that the Wall Street Journal has never failed a fact check regarding news reporting; however, IFCN fact checkers Climate Feedback and Health Feedback has found numerous inaccuracies in The Wall Street Journal editorial department.
... The Wall Street Journal has won 37 Pulitzer Prizes (as of 2019). The editorial pages of the Wall Street Journal are typically conservative in their position. The Wall Street Journal editorial board has promoted views that differ from the scientific consensus on climate change [climate change denial, acid rain, and ozone depletion, as well as on the health harms of second-hand smoke, pesticides and asbestos. It is regarded as a "newspaper of record," particularly in terms of business and financial news. ...
Here is an example of The Wall Street Journal's bias:
... In 2018, an editorial in The Wall Street Journal claimed that "Donziger's attempted looting of
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to funding from anti-LGBT sources The Anschutz Corporation / Philip Anschutz, who has funded the horrendously transphobic Family Research Council - a
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.
Bias Rating: RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
The Washington Examiner is owned by Clarity Media Group [The Anschutz Corporation], which is owned by Philip Anschutz, an American billionaire entrepreneur who describes himself as a "conservative Christian." Anschutz is also the owner of the
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize, particularly political reporting. The main concern - like
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
In 2013,
According to
In review,
On 2021-03-16,
A computer infected by malware proved a Vermont power company targeted for disruption by Russian hackers. - MOSTLY FALSE.
Donald Trump said, "find the fraud," "National Hero" - FALSE (corrected 2 months later).
Wikipedia: The Washington Post,2020-07-03.
On 2013-08-05,
In 2014-03
Throughout the early years of ownership,
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: although the Washington Times has an extreme right editorial bias, they report straight news with a much lower bias. Therefore, we rate them right-center biased overall. We also rate them Questionable and factually mixed due to poor sourcing, holding editorial positions contrary to scientific consensus, and numerous failed fact checks.
Reasoning: Numerous Failed Fact Checks, Poor Sourcing, Lack of Transparency | Bias Rating: RIGHT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY.
Operations Holdings Inc is the Washington Times owner, which is owned by the Unification Church of South Korea, through their holding company HSA-UWC (Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity). In 1954, Reverend Sun Myung Moon founded this religious movement in South Korea, known for its mass weddings, and its members are referred to as "Moonies." According to a
Has published disinformation / misinformation articles by The Heritage Foundation - e.g., this 2018-02-04 article by Rebecca Hagelin, attacking George Soros and his Open Society Foundations.
π STOP! Excluded from sources due to funding from anti-LGBT sources The Anschutz Corporation / Philip Anschutz, who has funded the horrendously transphobic Family Research Council - a
See also: Washington Examiner
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: in 2017, The Weekly Standard became the first conservative fact-checker to join Facebook's Fact Checking Network and is a signatory of the International Fact Checking Network, which Media Bias Fact Check uses to determine factual reporting for our source reviews.
[Comment: Despite that positive statement (above), (1) Facebook is a notorious misinformation and disinformation source, and (2) note the prefacing statements regarding ownership of The Weekly Standard by the notoriously anti-LGBT Philip Anschutz, who has funded the
UPDATE: On 12/14/2018 The Weekly Standard announced they will cease publishing as of 12/17/2018.
The Weekly Standard is owned by Clarity Media Group, which also owns other
[Comment: The MediaBiasFactCheck statements below are slightly dated, and concerning regarding inclusion of notorious Fox News personality Tucker Carlson as a credible source ...]
The Weekly Standard has a solid reputation for well written conservative journalism featuring prominent writers such as Tucker Carlson, Brit Hume, and PJ O'Rourke. The Weekly Standard typically publishes articles that are favorable to the right and uses moderately loaded wording such as this: "Are Conservatives Giving Up On Democracy?" When reporting on President Trump The Weekly Standard is neither openly for, or against him, but rather reports factually with a conservative-leaning opinion. When it comes to sourcing information, they tend to use quotes as they are a print magazine. Articles on the website are properly sourced with hyperlinks to credible media outlets.
In 2017, The Weekly Standard became the first conservative fact-checker to join Facebook's Fact Checking Network and is a signatory of the International Fact Checking Network, which Media Bias Fact Check uses to determine factual reporting for our source reviews. (7/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 8/9/2018)
π STOP! Excluded from sources.
[MediaBiasFactCheck.com, 2022-06-10] The Western Journal: A questionable source, The Western Journal exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source.
Questionable Reasoning: Far Right, Failed Fact Checks, Propaganda, Conspiracy | Bias Rating: FAR RIGHT | Factual Reporting: MIXED | Country: USA | Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE | Media Type: Website | Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic | MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY
Liftable Media, Inc. acquired
Finally, during the 2020 Presidential election,
Numerous fail fact checks ...
[Wikipedia, 2022-07-29]
Western Journalism founder
The site was acquired by
Newsweek reported that the site has grown from receiving 1,000 page views a day in 2009 to more than 1 million during 2016.
In a 2016 story on how
The company changed its name in 2018 to
Western Journalism previously stated it featured "conservative, libertarian, free market and pro-family writers and broadcasters" and seeks to provide "God-honoring" content. In practice, according to
In 2019-02,
In 2021-11, a study by the
π STOP! Excluded from sources - see also: Western Standard.
Canadian disinformation source, originally founded in 2004 by disinformation troll Ezra Levant; later relaunched in 2019 by disinformation troll Derek Fildebrandt.
β οΈ CAUTION: potentially questionable content; carefully scrutinize.
See also: Editorial Practices Concerning Wikipedia-Sourced Material on Persagen.com
Wikipedia (Wikipedia entry on Wikipedia).
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Wikipedia Least Biased based on a wide variety of content that often covers pros and cons, right and left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to possible inaccurate or incomplete entries as stated by Wikipedia themselves, that may reflect the personal biases of the top editors and a complete lack of transparency regarding the qualifications and who the editors are.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED | Factual Reporting: MIXED | MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY.
Volunteers edit Wikipedia content rather than the Wikimedia Foundation. Although Wikipedia is edited essentially by anyone, a 2005 study published in the Journal Nature showed that they were just as accurate as the Encyclopedia Britannica when it comes to scientific information. In another study completed in 2014 by the Public Library of Science, they compared Wikipedia's accuracy on Drug information compared to other sources. The study showed that "Quantitative analysis revealed that the accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia was 99.7%Β±0.2% than the textbook data. The overall completeness of drug information in Wikipedia was 83.8Β±1.5% (p<0.001)." They concluded that "Wikipedia is an accurate and comprehensive source of drug-related information for undergraduate medical education."
It is nearly impossible to analyze when it comes to bias, as each entry changes frequently and is edited by people with different opinions. In general, most Wikipedia entries cover both positives and negatives and link to mostly credible sources of information to support their claims. Since bias varies from entry to entry and line to line, we rate them least biased as many perspectives are found on Wikipedia; however, each entry may convey the bias of the top editors.
Full disclosure, I am a Wikipedia editor. A very low-ranking one who has only edited a few entries; however, my experience over the years shows that for each entry, you generally have one or two very high-ranking editors who have almost total control over what is published on the Wiki page. This may lead to bias displayed on some entries. For example, I have edited a page and provided solid evidence from an authoritative credible source, only to find it undone within 30 minutes. I have seen this over and over. In other words, in some cases, entries are not community entries but rather a reflection of the biases of the top Wikipedians (editors). Some have referred to this as a cabal; however, Wikipedia denies that a cabal exists.
It is also vital to point out that Wikipedia does not consider itself credible. They state the following on their Wikipedia is not a reliable source page: "Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because anyone can edit it at any time, any information it contains at a particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error are usually fixed after some time. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot constantly monitor every contribution. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for hours, days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source in and of itself."
They also state, "Articles are only as good as the editors who have been editing them - their interests, education, and background - and the efforts they have put into a particular topic or article." Another consideration is the lack of transparency of editors as they remain anonymous. Therefore, we don't know their backgrounds, and they have no accountability of using their real name in the public sphere. So, in general, Wikipedia is a good resource to start research that will lead to more credible sources of information. Wikipedia also has a solid track record when it comes to science and evidence-based Wiki pages. However, in some cases, the Wiki pages that rely on the opinions of others may be very misleading as they reflect the will and biases of the authoritative editors.
None to date, however, some entries are not complete or may be inaccurate as stated by Wikipedia.
[RenΓ©e DiResta, theAtlantic.com, 2021-07-21] Institutional Authority Has Vanished. Wikipedia Points to the Answer. The crowdsourced reference site can teach the CDC how to communicate in an era of rumors and shifting information.
[Quora.com, 2020+] What is Wikitia and how is it different from Wikipedia?
Wikitia is an English, web-based, free-content verified encyclopedia and based on a model where only verified editors can edit the content. It was created to eliminate the flaws of Wikipedia where admins, editors can make a decision without specializing in a particular topic or field. The Wikipedia editors approve or reject any edit, any page based on their personal experience which is not verified and often disguise the users.
Wikipedia entries:
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Based in
In review,
When it comes to sourcing,
None in the Last 5 years.
Note: Yahoo! News is primarily a news aggregator, than a news source.
MediaBiasFactCheck.com: overall, we rate Yahoo! News Left-Center biased based on aggregation from more left-leaning sources as well as editorial content that slightly favors the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting (original content) due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER | Factual Reporting: HIGH | MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY.
Founded in 1996, Yahoo! News is a news website that originated as an internet-based news aggregator by the search engine Yahoo! Articles originally came from popular news services such as
In 2011, Yahoo! expanded its focus to include original content and in 2012 the website had a correspondent in the White House press corps for the first time. As of January 2019, Yahoo! News ranked sixth among global news sites, ahead of Fox News and behind
Several companies in its history have owned Yahoo!, most recently being acquired by Apollo Global Management from Verizon in a deal said to be worth $5 billion. Yahoo! generates revenue through advertising as well as an e-commerce shop.
In review, Yahoo! News is primarily a news aggregator, however, they do provide original content written by staff journalists. First, we will examine the sources used for aggregation. Yahoo! News breaks news down to the following categories: U.S., World, Politics, Originals, and Health. Under U.S. news, Yahoo! News aggregates content exclusively from
The Politics section consists of only original content written by Yahoo! Staff, as does the Originals section. Under the Health tab, there are various sources used, with none of them being High Science. Most stories are derived from magazines like Self, Shape, and Men's Health. Finally, under the News Home tab, they list all the stories from all the categories. On 4/4/2019, we reviewed the first 100 stories on the homepage and calculated percentages based on the bias of sources used. The results indicate Yahoo! News selects more left-leaning sources. See the charts below.
Yahoo!'s original content found on the Politics page leans left in wording and story selection, such as this: "Trump just a blowhard on windmills, lawmakers say of 'idiotic' comments." However, they will also publish information that is not favorable to Democrats, like this: Seven women have now accused Joe Biden of inappropriate touching. On a whole, after reviewing dozens of original political news stories, more favor the left than the right. Further, original content is properly sourced to credible media outlets.
None to date.
π STOP! Excluded from sources. ZeroHedge.com
Type: news aggregation website.
ZeroHedge.com / ABC Media, LTD
[BusinessInsider.com, 2020-02-01] Finance blog Zero Hedge was banned from Twitter for Wuhan coronavirus misinformation. It's not the first time the publication has raised eyebrows. Source
Zero Hedge, a financial blog that rose to popularity in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, was permanently suspended from Twitter for what the platform deemed as spreading misinformation over the Wuhan coronavirus.
The site has been described as "far-right" and "pro-Trump" after it was first established as a strong voice offering counter-culture takes in finance and politics.
[π pinned article] Alden Global Capital (erosion of local news; ...)
[Economist.com, 2022-02-17] Private equity is buying up America's newspapers. It may be helping more than it's hurting.
Private equity is keeping newspapers in business. In a new working paper, researchers at the
But there's a catch. After private-equity buy-outs, papers laid off
For
The authors caution that they cannot estimate the general causal effect of
[CBC.ca, 2021-12-07] Spy agency warned Trudeau China's tactics becoming more "sophisticated ... insidious". CSIS says foreign interference operations "have become normalized."
As
One way
CSIS spokesperson
It's a tactic former Conservative Party of Canada MP Kenny Chiu said he knows all too well. He said he was targeted during the 2021 Canadian federal election by a
Earlier this year, Alliance Canada Hong Kong - an
[ ... snip ... ]
Return to Persagen.com